Nizcoo

Nizcoo — CS2 Stats

US76561198063537202[U:1:103271474]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,105Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,326Purple band · top ~15.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94990 of 224934 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 28 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,326 +3,014 28 Jun16 Sept · 26 days played
15,31219,551peak 19,55128 Jun16 Sept
19,551Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,305Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-06-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,305
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 46 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,225 below peak (19,551)
  • -1,098 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,014 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,674 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNizcooPREMIER18,326 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,305csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning50
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.0
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time556ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 16 Aug
44%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 10 Jul
383msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 23 Aug
12–0Biggest win · mirage, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.02
nukeA2011955%0.03
cacheB157847%0.01
ancientC135838%0.04
infernoC104640%0.02
dust2S64267%-0.03
vertigoA53260%0.01
anubis2020%-0.05
office21150%-0.05
train1010%0.11
overpass110100%0.03
alpine1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,372Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
88.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3661%1.0816.8
Nuke1958%1.5419.6
Inferno1457%1.1915.2
Ancient1443%1.1717.6
Vertigo333%0.6512.0
Overpass2100%1.4819.0
Dust22100%1.1113.5
Cache1100%1.4320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
553msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.26HE damage / grenade
14.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2449% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0320%17 Sept
inferno11–130.0217%16 Sept
nuke13–100.0225%6 Sept
inferno9–60.0520%3 Sept
office2–13-0.1130%3 Sept
dust23–13-0.0833%30 Aug
mirage13–40.1029%30 Aug
mirage13–20.0630%30 Aug
cache13–40.0927%30 Aug
cache8–13-0.0026%30 Aug
nuke4–130.0121%30 Aug
dust213–80.0031%30 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0911%30 Aug
cache13–30.0537%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0218%30 Aug
mirage12–00.1615%28 Aug
nuke8–130.0239%28 Aug
vertigo13–20.0233%28 Aug
nuke9–130.1230%27 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0223%27 Aug
inferno2–130.0022%23 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0218%23 Aug
cache3–13-0.1013%23 Aug
nuke13–90.0129%19 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0019%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0123%19 Aug
cache15–15-0.0118%18 Aug
nuke13–90.0124%17 Aug
cache3–80.0127%17 Aug
ancient13–50.2337%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0227%16 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0320%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0627%13 Aug
dust213–8-0.0223%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0214%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0618%12 Aug
train12–120.1126%12 Aug
nuke7–130.0016%11 Aug
mirage16–120.0320%7 Aug
inferno13–30.0933%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0521%5 Aug
inferno13–80.1430%5 Aug
cache16–12-0.069%1 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0220%1 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0716%1 Aug
ancient11–130.0126%1 Aug
dust213–90.0325%1 Aug
mirage11–130.0221%1 Aug
vertigo13–100.0113%29 Jul
cache13–110.0125%29 Jul
ancient13–30.1230%29 Jul
anubis5–13-0.085%29 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0726%28 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0222%28 Jul
mirage13–30.0524%28 Jul
ancient10–130.0318%27 Jul
cache8–130.0621%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.077%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0112%25 Jul
cache13–100.0731%25 Jul
nuke13–10.0927%23 Jul
ancient13–20.2022%23 Jul
cache8–130.0718%23 Jul
mirage7–130.1028%21 Jul
cache13–70.0116%21 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0021%13 Jul
nuke13–90.0225%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.069%12 Jul
nuke13–70.0526%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0021%10 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0213%10 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0719%10 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0124%10 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0244%10 Jul
dust213–6-0.0327%10 Jul
nuke13–80.0320%10 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0735%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0616%10 Jul
mirage16–140.0529%10 Jul
cache13–70.0312%8 Jul
vertigo12–120.0326%8 Jul
vertigo1–7-0.050%7 Jul
nuke9–130.0213%3 Jul
nuke13–60.1327%3 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0028%2 Jul
ancient13–70.1322%2 Jul
nuke13–80.1028%30 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0116%30 Jun
mirage5–130.0225%30 Jun
nuke9–130.0231%30 Jun
inferno13–110.0426%29 Jun
overpass13–100.0325%29 Jun
mirage13–100.0425%29 Jun
mirage13–110.0022%29 Jun
vertigo13–100.0435%28 Jun
alpine10–130.0529%28 Jun
office13–6-0.0027%28 Jun
cache6–13-0.0218%28 Jun
mirage11–13-0.049%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0517%28 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →