Kind0 — CS2 Stats

PRO“Edis”Partizan EsportsSerbiaRiflerSettings & gear profile →

RS76561198062283345[U:1:102017617]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

3,158Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport

CSDB Leaderboard#208881 of 258260 tracked

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (35 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,793 → 3,793

+52Tracked matches · now 3,158

−10.0ppWin rate · 66.7% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,793 +0 28 Aug – 23 Sept · 11 observations

3,793Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

33Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,793
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 207 to go
Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning54

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61–39Last 10061%Win rateLLWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

12–8 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1

Utility6.2

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.4

Utility6.2

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time492ms+20ms

first ⅓ avg 472ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms

Headshot accuracy18.6%−1.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 12 Sept →

39%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · nuke, 1 Oct →

297msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 13 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 24mirageWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	S	24	16–8	67%	0.01
dust2	A	21	13–8	62%	-0.02
nuke	A	20	11–9	55%	-0.01
inferno	A	19	12–7	63%	0.01
mirage	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.04
anubis	—	4	4–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,321Matches

59%Win rate

1.29Avg K/D

82.1ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	342	59%	1.32	17.5
Ancient	310	58%	1.33	17.2
Dust2	216	65%	1.33	17.2
Nuke	176	69%	1.46	16.7
Inferno	162	69%	1.29	15.8
Anubis	90	56%	1.30	17.3
Overpass	29	55%	1.36	15.7
Vertigo	19	63%	1.57	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$1,488Inventory value53ItemsFull inventory breakdown →

$690

$326

$311

$67

$49

$28

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.6%Spray accuracy

77.5%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

498msReaction time

43.9%T opening success

51.6%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

7.5%Flash assists

8.01HE damage / grenade

11.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	-0.01	34%	26 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	4%	26 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.02	22%	25 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.02	12%	25 Oct →
nuke	13–2	-0.01	13%	25 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.03	28%	25 Oct →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	17%	24 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.06	23%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.03	22%	24 Oct →
cache	13–10	0.05	14%	24 Oct →
cache	13–16	-0.01	14%	20 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	16%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.02	18%	20 Oct →
nuke	16–13	-0.03	30%	20 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.00	17%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–1	0.01	33%	19 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	31%	19 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	0%	16 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.02	20%	16 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	18%	15 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.01	15%	15 Oct →
dust2	2–13	-0.11	11%	13 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.09	10%	8 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.02	16%	8 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	24%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.03	20%	6 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.05	22%	6 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	17%	6 Oct →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	16%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.07	22%	5 Oct →
cache	5–13	-0.03	26%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–2	0.03	15%	2 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.03	16%	2 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	10%	1 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	39%	1 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.01	19%	1 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.03	21%	28 Sept →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	25%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	13%	27 Sept →
inferno	0–3	0.00	33%	27 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.02	27%	25 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	10%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.01	12%	25 Sept →
nuke	14–16	-0.06	14%	25 Sept →
inferno	1–0	0.00	0%	25 Sept →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	18%	25 Sept →
inferno	12–7	0.01	9%	25 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.01	16%	24 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.01	12%	24 Sept →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	16%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	16%	23 Sept →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	10%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.01	23%	22 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	24%	22 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.05	32%	21 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.01	22%	21 Sept →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	10%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	21%	19 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	24%	19 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.01	14%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	14%	18 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.02	27%	18 Sept →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	23%	16 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	21%	16 Sept →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	24%	13 Sept →
cache	8–13	-0.02	20%	13 Sept →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	12%	13 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	19%	13 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.04	23%	13 Sept →
nuke	16–14	0.01	21%	13 Sept →
cache	13–0	0.10	31%	12 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.05	29%	12 Sept →
nuke	13–5	0.05	24%	10 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.09	18%	10 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.05	27%	10 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	14%	10 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.06	13%	10 Sept →
nuke	16–13	0.01	16%	9 Sept →
cache	13–7	-0.02	10%	9 Sept →
cache	13–6	-0.01	15%	8 Sept →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	16%	8 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.03	28%	8 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	24%	6 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.04	23%	6 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	21%	5 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	12%	5 Sept →
cache	13–3	0.06	19%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	18%	2 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	16%	2 Sept →
nuke	13–5	0.04	20%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	12%	30 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	24%	30 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	11%	30 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	24%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	24%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.00	12%	30 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.03	23%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.09	24%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	16%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	22%	29 Aug →