-

- — CS2 Stats

76561198061991151[U:1:101725423]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

178Tracked matches71%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating20,700Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64823 of 224071 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Jun 2026 (94 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 16 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,700 +2,132 28 Feb16 Jun · 7 days played
18,56820,700peak 20,70028 Feb16 Jun
20,700Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2025-08-16

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,700
  • +2,027 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,300 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,700 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning63
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59338Last 10059%Win rateLWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.0
Utility5.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch6.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.3
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time548ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 4 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · poseidon, 4 Feb
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · cache, 30 Apr
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 11 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS1711665%0.04
poseidonS1410471%0.06
dust2B136746%0.01
mirageS107370%0.01
ancientA85363%0.03
anubisS75271%0.13
infernoS65183%0.00
overpass41325%0.06
vertigo440100%0.16
train41325%0.03
office42250%0.08
nuke31233%0.01
shelter1010%-0.05
alpine1010%0.10
warden1010%0.02
italy1010%-0.01
sanctum110100%0.23
grail1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
73%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
96.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2786%1.4417.3
Mirage560%1.3119.0
Inferno475%1.3822.3
Ancient3100%1.8918.7
Anubis333%1.1822.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
532msReaction time
52.0%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.95HE damage / grenade
11.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3575 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
shelter5–13-0.0517%15 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0034%16 Jun
cache13–40.0627%3 May
cache13–60.1621%3 May
cache4–13-0.0329%30 Apr
cache13–80.0518%30 Apr
cache10–130.0123%30 Apr
cache13–80.1233%30 Apr
cache13–100.0223%30 Apr
cache13–100.0630%30 Apr
cache13–80.0222%30 Apr
cache7–130.1034%29 Apr
cache13–30.0322%29 Apr
cache7–130.0615%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.0021%29 Apr
cache9–130.0226%29 Apr
cache13–30.0026%29 Apr
cache13–7-0.0324%29 Apr
cache13–60.0429%29 Apr
overpass12–120.0831%14 Apr
vertigo13–00.1934%11 Apr
vertigo13–50.2023%11 Apr
anubis13–90.1119%4 Apr
anubis13–20.2726%4 Apr
dust25–00.0613%30 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0410%30 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0114%28 Mar
inferno12–120.0221%28 Mar
ancient13–40.019%27 Mar
anubis13–70.088%27 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0210%27 Mar
train10–130.0117%27 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0342%27 Mar
anubis13–10.0636%26 Mar
dust213–60.0041%21 Mar
vertigo13–90.1225%21 Mar
ancient12–120.0141%21 Mar
office10–130.1026%18 Mar
office12–120.0615%18 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0717%18 Mar
overpass12–120.1017%13 Mar
poseidon9–20.2535%8 Mar
poseidon6–9-0.0336%8 Mar
poseidon4–9-0.0917%8 Mar
dust213–6-0.0230%8 Mar
train13–30.1330%7 Mar
dust23–13-0.0527%3 Mar
dust21–7-0.040%28 Feb
nuke13–30.0622%28 Feb
overpass13–110.0622%28 Feb
mirage13–40.1937%23 Feb
dust212–120.0317%23 Feb
dust25–13-0.0328%21 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0721%21 Feb
inferno13–90.0221%21 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0117%21 Feb
ancient13–90.0917%20 Feb
mirage13–100.0316%20 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0019%18 Feb
mirage7–130.0137%18 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0320%18 Feb
mirage13–80.0021%13 Feb
vertigo13–20.1120%11 Feb
dust210–13-0.0317%9 Feb
ancient13–80.0520%7 Feb
alpine12–120.1015%6 Feb
dust213–100.0526%6 Feb
inferno13–60.0117%6 Feb
poseidon4–9-0.0736%4 Feb
poseidon6–9-0.048%4 Feb
poseidon9–40.0217%4 Feb
poseidon9–40.1917%4 Feb
poseidon9–40.2630%4 Feb
poseidon9–50.0417%4 Feb
poseidon9–20.1650%4 Feb
poseidon9–10.0532%4 Feb
warden8–130.0210%24 Jan
italy9–13-0.0123%24 Jan
anubis11–130.0731%24 Jan
poseidon9–3-0.0212%24 Jan
sanctum9–10.2311%23 Jan
poseidon9–30.0725%23 Jan
poseidon9–50.0632%23 Jan
office13–5-0.0419%23 Jan
office13–60.1925%23 Jan
anubis5–130.0922%9 Jan
inferno13–110.0128%7 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0224%7 Jan
train2–130.0131%6 Jan
dust23–13-0.0047%6 Jan
dust210–130.0222%4 Jan
dust213–70.0824%9 Sept
anubis13–20.2021%22 Aug
train12–12-0.0140%19 Aug
ancient13–110.1216%19 Aug
overpass14–160.0114%17 Aug
mirage13–00.0524%17 Aug
dust213–60.0117%17 Aug
grail3–13-0.0823%16 Aug
ancient11–130.0230%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →