bkf

bkf — CS2 Stats

UA76561198061559017[U:1:101293289]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,136Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,440Purple band · top ~18.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,699 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,136 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,440 -4,102 26 Jun – 26 Oct · 25 days played
16,09621,542peak 21,54226 Jun26 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,699 +0 1 Sept – 26 Oct · 4 observations
1,6991,699peak 1,6991 Sept26 Oct
21,889Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,699Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,699
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 52 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,102 below peak (21,542)
  • -1,138 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,560 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-26
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbkfFACEITLevel 6 · 1,699 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,440 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,699csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning68
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −113ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 467ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility7.2
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning6.8
Utility7.2
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time541ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 28 Sept →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · inferno, 8 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · dust2, 20 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2812–1643%0.02
anubisA1610–663%0.02
ancientD144–1029%0.01
cacheA127–558%0.01
nukeA117–464%0.00
infernoC104–640%0.01
mirageD93–633%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
82.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27658%1.0615.3
Ancient4558%1.1115.8
Mirage4347%0.9513.9
Anubis2741%0.9815.4
Inferno2726%0.7512.9
Nuke1060%0.8913.2
Vertigo850%1.0714.6
Train650%1.0014.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
67.0%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
526msReaction time
54.3%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
10.39HE damage / grenade
17.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2338° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0220%14 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0822%13 Oct →
ancient8–130.0314%13 Oct →
inferno13–110.0627%12 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0117%11 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0622%11 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0113%11 Oct →
mirage6–12-0.0217%7 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0017%30 Sept →
cache13–40.0818%30 Sept →
inferno13–70.0626%29 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.054%29 Sept →
inferno13–60.1723%28 Sept →
mirage13–20.0420%28 Sept →
mirage9–130.0620%27 Sept →
nuke13–160.0321%27 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0017%27 Sept →
cache13–20.0216%26 Sept →
ancient10–130.0914%26 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0224%26 Sept →
anubis13–100.0614%24 Sept →
mirage1–8-0.0433%24 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0315%24 Sept →
cache2–13-0.1113%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.0120%23 Sept →
cache13–100.0518%23 Sept →
nuke13–90.0117%22 Sept →
anubis13–70.0413%22 Sept →
ancient13–60.0023%21 Sept →
ancient15–150.0424%21 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0132%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0326%20 Sept →
anubis16–140.0116%20 Sept →
dust20–4-0.080%20 Sept →
ancient6–10-0.0811%20 Sept →
dust215–150.0513%20 Sept →
cache8–130.0420%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0723%19 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.1011%19 Sept →
dust28–130.0620%19 Sept →
dust215–150.0325%19 Sept →
dust213–10.0922%19 Sept →
mirage13–100.028%16 Sept →
dust213–70.1114%14 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0217%13 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0427%13 Sept →
anubis13–10.1710%13 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0122%13 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0514%13 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.008%13 Sept →
dust213–100.0517%13 Sept →
anubis13–10.1310%12 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0615%12 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0812%12 Sept →
anubis13–100.0714%12 Sept →
nuke13–30.066%12 Sept →
anubis13–100.0310%11 Sept →
ancient13–110.0315%11 Sept →
dust210–130.0119%11 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0610%11 Sept →
anubis9–130.0910%11 Sept →
mirage4–130.0616%11 Sept →
dust28–130.0611%11 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0331%10 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.043%10 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0428%9 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0453%8 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0122%8 Sept →
dust213–160.0114%7 Sept →
nuke12–40.0223%7 Sept →
inferno8–130.0423%7 Sept →
dust213–110.0221%7 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0213%29 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.018%29 Aug →
dust29–130.0515%29 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0021%29 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0114%28 Aug →
ancient11–130.0314%28 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0330%27 Aug →
nuke13–40.0416%22 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0317%22 Aug →
dust213–10.0624%22 Aug →
inferno10–130.046%21 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0228%20 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0119%20 Aug →
dust211–130.0518%20 Aug →
ancient11–70.0215%13 Aug →
dust213–40.0119%13 Aug →
cache13–100.0120%9 Aug →
ancient13–40.0826%9 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.067%9 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0311%31 Jul →
dust213–50.0420%4 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0227%3 Jul →
dust213–70.048%2 Jul →
anubis13–110.0111%27 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0515%27 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0424%27 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0517%26 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0420%26 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.