bmo

bmo — CS2 Stats

76561198060802468[U:1:100536740]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,349Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,744 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,744 → 2,744
+4Tracked matches · now 3,349
0.0ppWin rate · 46.7% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 24 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,473 +66 31 May25 Jun · 3 days played
26,40726,776peak 26,77631 May25 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,744 +0 29 Aug20 Sept · 3 observations
2,7442,744peak 2,74429 Aug20 Sept
26,776Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,744Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-05-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,744
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 256 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbmoFACEITLevel 10 · 2,744 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,744csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning52
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57421Last 10057%Win rateLLWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.2
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time535ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 25 Jun
60%Best headshot accuracy · 5–1 · cache, 15 Jun
398msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 7 Sept
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 93% over 14dust2Weakest map · 31% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2681831%-0.00
anubisA1911858%0.00
cacheS1712571%0.02
infernoS1413193%0.02
mirageB105550%-0.01
ancientC73443%0.03
nukeA53260%0.01
overpass220100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,674Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
74.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust254949%1.0315.6
Anubis42854%1.0615.9
Inferno31755%1.0715.8
Mirage30150%0.9914.7
Ancient20246%1.0215.4
Train14158%1.0614.8
Overpass10753%1.0615.7
Nuke9251%0.9815.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
532msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
10.65HE damage / grenade
13.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2076% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0243%15 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0027%8 Sept
dust213–70.0534%7 Sept
nuke13–90.0025%7 Sept
dust210–13-0.0321%7 Sept
inferno13–70.0426%7 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0424%5 Sept
dust216–14-0.017%3 Sept
cache13–10-0.0537%1 Sept
cache10–13-0.0612%1 Sept
dust213–50.0234%31 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0117%31 Aug
dust213–80.0628%31 Aug
dust210–13-0.0429%31 Aug
cache13–110.0433%30 Aug
dust26–130.0225%23 Aug
anubis8–130.0218%23 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0529%22 Aug
dust210–130.0515%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0323%22 Aug
mirage3–130.0218%19 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0119%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.0215%18 Aug
anubis13–50.0110%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0420%17 Aug
ancient8–130.0221%17 Aug
anubis13–40.0726%17 Aug
dust216–19-0.0124%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0117%17 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0518%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0719%16 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0920%16 Aug
ancient17–190.0324%16 Aug
nuke16–120.0127%15 Aug
anubis13–60.0047%15 Aug
anubis13–160.0315%15 Aug
cache8–130.1026%15 Aug
dust212–16-0.0211%13 Aug
cache13–60.0513%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0619%10 Aug
cache16–120.0122%10 Aug
anubis13–110.0318%10 Aug
cache13–100.0225%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0116%9 Aug
cache14–160.0029%8 Aug
cache13–6-0.0532%8 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0540%8 Aug
inferno16–130.0429%7 Aug
dust210–130.0324%7 Aug
anubis13–50.0015%7 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0038%7 Aug
cache13–40.0122%7 Aug
dust27–130.0117%4 Aug
cache13–110.0323%4 Aug
dust213–4-0.0724%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0217%4 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0220%3 Aug
cache11–13-0.0313%3 Aug
cache13–11-0.0330%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0138%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0422%30 Jul
cache13–70.0518%28 Jun
nuke9–70.0626%27 Jun
overpass13–70.0345%26 Jun
inferno13–100.0525%26 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0325%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.0016%25 Jun
dust213–60.1226%25 Jun
dust211–130.0333%24 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0413%20 Jun
dust213–110.0223%20 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0030%20 Jun
cache13–50.0818%15 Jun
cache5–10.1060%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0222%15 Jun
inferno13–50.0823%15 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0416%15 Jun
dust26–13-0.0123%10 Jun
mirage13–80.0220%9 Jun
dust213–110.0229%7 Jun
overpass13–70.0123%7 Jun
inferno13–80.0425%6 Jun
ancient13–70.0527%6 Jun
ancient9–130.0718%5 Jun
ancient13–110.0021%5 Jun
anubis16–140.0522%4 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0223%31 May
inferno13–100.0124%31 May
anubis3–13-0.0211%31 May
nuke0–70.0044%31 May
cache12–12-0.0218%30 May
mirage6–13-0.0119%30 May
anubis10–13-0.0220%30 May
ancient11–130.0728%30 May
ancient13–10-0.0027%29 May
anubis9–130.0630%29 May
anubis13–11-0.0313%25 May
inferno13–11-0.0125%25 May
dust211–13-0.0518%24 May
anubis13–80.0216%24 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →