bomber rat

bomber rat — CS2 Stats

FI76561198060599336[U:1:100333608]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,119Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,060Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#80387 of 230609 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 18 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,771 -228 8 Nov16 Nov · 3 days played
19,77119,999peak 19,9998 Nov16 Nov
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2025-05-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate46.4%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy14.6%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.670.991.020.35 short
Match win rate46.6%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbomber ratFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning45
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51445Last 10051%Win rateWLWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility3.3
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning4.5
Utility3.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time642ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 17 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 9 Nov
438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · nuke, 17 Mar
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 8 Nov

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7overpassWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%-0.05
dust2S1913668%-0.02
nukeB147750%-0.01
ancientD103730%-0.06
vertigoC94544%-0.03
overpassD92722%-0.05
anubisS75271%-0.05
train32167%0.02
inferno2020%-0.08
cache1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,741Lifetime kills
0.67K/D
3,002Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
46.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
5,435MVPs
3,060Hours (in match)
2,663Bombs planted
739Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,761inferno
3,995dust2
1,945nuke
1,298vertigo
1,143train
188office
71cbble
40assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

275Matches
48%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
57.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
27.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.3%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
634msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
38.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
7.85HE damage / grenade
4.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5247% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0214%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0615%28 Jul
dust213–10-0.0743%3 May
cache2–13-0.0221%3 May
mirage13–50.0017%14 Apr
vertigo8–13-0.0114%14 Apr
nuke3–13-0.109%1 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0618%17 Mar
nuke5–130.0329%17 Mar
overpass13–60.0118%17 Mar
anubis16–140.0221%17 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0813%1 Mar
mirage3–13-0.107%1 Mar
dust213–8-0.0810%1 Mar
inferno11–13-0.1118%22 Feb
ancient4–13-0.1431%22 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0710%25 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0727%16 Jan
nuke13–90.0019%16 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0828%16 Jan
dust213–11-0.0221%16 Jan
vertigo9–13-0.0722%16 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0611%16 Jan
vertigo13–70.0123%6 Dec
mirage13–7-0.035%6 Dec
dust213–9-0.0226%6 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0621%16 Nov
overpass4–13-0.0317%16 Nov
train13–70.0136%15 Nov
ancient5–13-0.0718%15 Nov
mirage13–2-0.0450%9 Nov
mirage13–10-0.1013%9 Nov
train13–30.0331%8 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0133%8 Nov
dust213–10.0422%8 Nov
overpass11–13-0.0838%8 Nov
ancient16–13-0.1025%8 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0235%1 Nov
dust213–20.0734%1 Nov
train10–130.0023%12 Oct
mirage13–11-0.0416%16 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0526%16 Aug
overpass11–130.0231%16 Aug
dust213–10.0722%16 Aug
mirage4–130.0510%16 Aug
vertigo0–13-0.0617%8 Aug
mirage12–12-0.1218%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0312%29 Jul
dust212–12-0.0211%29 Jul
overpass14–16-0.0424%27 Jul
nuke13–10.0929%27 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0614%27 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0733%27 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0217%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0632%27 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0013%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.100%20 Jul
dust213–8-0.0226%20 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0823%19 Jul
dust213–9-0.0429%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0417%19 Jul
nuke13–60.0017%16 Jul
overpass3–13-0.1016%16 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0816%15 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0745%9 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0840%9 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0723%9 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0228%1 Jul
dust27–13-0.0644%1 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0325%25 Jun
dust23–13-0.0225%25 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0820%25 Jun
anubis13–3-0.037%25 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0324%25 Jun
ancient5–130.0331%24 Jun
vertigo8–13-0.0222%24 Jun
dust213–10-0.0212%24 Jun
mirage13–90.0838%20 Jun
anubis11–13-0.1129%18 Jun
nuke12–120.0227%18 Jun
dust213–110.0131%18 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0829%18 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0613%18 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0415%17 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0323%17 Jun
nuke13–10.1930%17 Jun
dust212–12-0.0420%17 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0621%17 Jun
vertigo13–10.0733%17 Jun
nuke13–10.0729%17 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0532%17 Jun
dust26–13-0.0632%17 Jun
vertigo13–4-0.0916%13 Jun
mirage13–7-0.1025%13 Jun
dust213–11-0.0530%13 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0323%11 Jun
ancient10–13-0.079%20 May
mirage9–13-0.0917%20 May
dust213–60.0516%18 May
nuke13–9-0.0531%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →