sm0kyy

sm0kyy — CS2 Stats

CX76561198060557805[U:1:100292077]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,999Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,148Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#27285 of 219960 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,999 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 31 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,148 +5,528 2 Aug14 Sept · 17 days played
18,62026,191peak 26,1912 Aug14 Sept
26,191Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-07-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,043 below peak (26,191)
  • -956 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 852 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsm0kyyFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,148 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning40
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD63352Last 10063%Win rateLWWLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.0
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time546ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 16 Aug
69%Best headshot accuracy · 12–1 · inferno, 16 Aug
398msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 26 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
136In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 15nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2417771%0.02
cacheA2012860%0.04
anubisB158753%-0.01
mirageS1511473%0.00
ancientS118373%0.02
infernoA95456%0.00
nukeD62433%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,514Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
85.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4055%1.0214.6
Anubis3563%1.1118.9
Ancient3050%1.0216.4
Dust21656%1.1119.8
Vertigo1173%1.5018.6
Nuke978%1.0514.7
Inferno786%1.8719.1
Cache2100%1.0014.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
542msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
9.11HE damage / grenade
8.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.472 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7241% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–16-0.0326%1 Sept
dust213–5-0.0222%1 Sept
dust213–9-0.0224%1 Sept
cache8–13-0.0337%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0717%1 Sept
anubis11–130.0014%1 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0314%1 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0817%1 Sept
nuke6–130.0631%1 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0117%27 Aug
ancient13–90.0725%26 Aug
anubis16–140.0421%26 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0422%26 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0622%25 Aug
dust23–130.0221%23 Aug
dust213–90.0427%18 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0315%17 Aug
dust213–11-0.0321%16 Aug
ancient13–110.0716%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0421%16 Aug
cache13–100.0218%16 Aug
cache13–40.0230%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0318%16 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0328%16 Aug
cache13–110.0225%16 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0121%16 Aug
cache13–00.1831%16 Aug
dust24–13-0.0428%16 Aug
inferno12–10.1169%16 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0413%16 Aug
dust213–110.0319%16 Aug
anubis13–6-0.077%15 Aug
mirage13–40.0220%15 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0425%15 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0445%15 Aug
dust29–130.0222%15 Aug
mirage13–60.0630%14 Aug
anubis13–5-0.0314%13 Aug
nuke15–150.0623%13 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0221%13 Aug
cache11–130.0624%13 Aug
dust213–5-0.0526%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0526%13 Aug
mirage6–00.0820%13 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0529%13 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0523%13 Aug
dust213–6-0.0325%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0317%12 Aug
dust26–130.0230%12 Aug
cache13–30.0527%12 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0016%12 Aug
ancient13–110.0016%10 Aug
dust213–10.0520%10 Aug
nuke13–90.0117%10 Aug
dust213–90.0825%10 Aug
inferno13–80.0520%10 Aug
dust213–70.0721%10 Aug
anubis14–160.0218%10 Aug
dust216–140.0536%10 Aug
cache4–13-0.0122%10 Aug
anubis12–10-0.0423%10 Aug
ancient11–130.1016%8 Aug
dust216–120.0020%8 Aug
dust24–00.1025%8 Aug
nuke11–130.0531%7 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0220%7 Aug
dust213–100.0320%7 Aug
dust213–8-0.0122%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0119%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0517%4 Aug
cache13–90.1220%4 Aug
dust213–50.0431%4 Aug
anubis13–110.0716%4 Aug
dust213–80.0623%4 Aug
anubis10–30.1320%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0321%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0613%4 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0529%2 Aug
mirage13–70.0212%2 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0224%2 Aug
ancient16–120.0413%2 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0118%2 Aug
dust27–130.0231%2 Aug
cache13–40.1431%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0421%2 Aug
cache13–30.1028%2 Aug
dust22–130.0831%2 Aug
inferno13–20.0528%2 Aug
mirage13–40.0235%2 Aug
dust29–130.0225%2 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0813%1 Aug
cache13–60.0531%1 Aug
cache13–50.0036%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0425%1 Aug
cache1–13-0.0443%1 Aug
cache7–13-0.0521%1 Aug
cache13–70.0729%1 Aug
cache12–120.1122%31 Jul
cache13–110.0424%31 Jul
cache4–130.0326%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →