Xenothas

Xenothas — CS2 Stats

76561198059640408[U:1:99374680]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,699Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,280Top 25% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29860 of 258858 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,908 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,280 +2,518 29 Aug – 29 Oct · 15 days played
21,76224,980peak 24,98029 Aug29 Oct
24,980Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,116Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • 208 below peak (2,116)
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 700 below peak (24,980)
  • +957 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 720 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXenothasFACEITLevel 10 · 1,908 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,280 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,116csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning62
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWWWLLTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.9
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.2
Utility6.9
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time508ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 494ms → last ⅓ avg 508ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 3 Oct →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 3 Oct →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 4 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA3018–1260%0.01
ancientB2111–1052%-0.01
cacheA138–562%-0.01
nukeA116–555%-0.01
anubisC114–736%0.02
mirageB84–450%0.00
dust2S54–180%-0.01
rush_001—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,393Matches
49%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno39552%1.1015.1
Ancient35952%1.1315.7
Nuke19646%1.1015.7
Anubis11939%1.0615.8
Mirage9943%1.0515.7
Train9357%1.1315.5
Overpass6338%1.0314.7
Vertigo3358%1.2317.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
510msReaction time
48.3%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
9.31HE damage / grenade
11.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.0620%30 Oct →
inferno13–80.0620%30 Oct →
mirage13–80.0627%29 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0716%29 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0216%29 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0411%29 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0213%29 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0127%29 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0313%25 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0014%25 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0110%25 Oct →
inferno9–130.0017%25 Oct →
ancient13–90.0215%25 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0418%24 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0310%24 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0421%24 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0323%24 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0614%24 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0214%24 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0233%24 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.025%24 Oct →
inferno10–130.0320%24 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0533%24 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0219%23 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0513%23 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.026%23 Oct →
anubis8–130.0017%23 Oct →
mirage8–130.0125%20 Oct →
cache13–80.0117%20 Oct →
anubis13–40.0615%20 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0124%18 Oct →
inferno13–110.0312%18 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0217%18 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0133%18 Oct →
inferno13–110.0220%18 Oct →
anubis16–190.0016%17 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.018%17 Oct →
inferno16–140.0813%16 Oct →
inferno16–130.0421%16 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0214%16 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0318%16 Oct →
anubis11–130.0118%16 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0413%15 Oct →
nuke25–280.028%15 Oct →
inferno13–70.0314%15 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0016%15 Oct →
ancient13–100.0227%15 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0330%13 Oct →
nuke13–50.0113%13 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0422%13 Oct →
cache13–100.0226%13 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0112%13 Oct →
cache1–8-0.050%13 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0225%11 Oct →
cache13–40.0525%11 Oct →
ancient8–130.0017%11 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0623%10 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0211%10 Oct →
inferno16–140.0113%10 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0111%10 Oct →
inferno10–130.0212%10 Oct →
mirage16–140.0223%9 Oct →
anubis13–50.1013%9 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0416%9 Oct →
inferno13–70.0920%9 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0125%9 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0313%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0311%4 Oct →
ancient16–140.0121%4 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0224%4 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0226%4 Oct →
inferno16–140.0619%4 Oct →
rush_0014–0-0.0223%4 Oct →
dust213–40.0136%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0419%3 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0510%3 Oct →
nuke13–100.0118%3 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0225%3 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0129%3 Oct →
inferno13–30.1339%3 Oct →
ancient3–130.0026%3 Oct →
inferno13–80.0222%3 Oct →
cache13–100.0533%3 Oct →
inferno5–130.0119%2 Oct →
nuke13–90.0211%2 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0235%2 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0222%2 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0320%2 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0424%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0318%30 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0317%30 Sept →
inferno15–19-0.0210%29 Sept →
cache13–10-0.017%29 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0123%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0015%27 Sept →
cache13–60.0222%27 Sept →
anubis13–10.0817%27 Sept →
ancient13–50.1318%27 Sept →
inferno13–60.0321%27 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0614%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.