drinker of water

drinker of water — CS2 Stats

76561198058326133[U:1:98060405]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

924Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,954 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,954 → 1,954
+3Tracked matches · now 924
−5.8ppWin rate · 57.7% → 51.8%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,381 +1,762 11 Jan – 3 Sept · 6 days played
19,61922,589peak 22,58911 Jan3 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,954 +0 31 Aug – 28 Sept · 3 observations
1,9541,954peak 1,95431 Aug28 Sept
22,589Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,954Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-01-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,954
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 47 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdrinker of waterFACEITLevel 10 · 1,954 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,954csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning50
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–41–7Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWWWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · +44ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 11–6–3 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch1.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time578ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−4.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 22 May →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 29 Apr →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · office, 25 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 23 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2715–1256%-0.02
nukeB209–1145%-0.02
mirageC188–1044%0.02
infernoA106–460%0.05
anubisC94–544%-0.01
cacheA85–363%0.03
officeS64–267%-0.02
ancient—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,015Matches
55%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
74.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211765%1.0315.0
Mirage11353%1.0416.0
Nuke5474%1.1314.7
Inferno3658%1.0313.7
Anubis944%0.9414.9
Overpass667%1.3315.2
Cache540%1.1014.4
Ancient560%0.8012.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
594msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
6.75HE damage / grenade
9.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5751% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–16-0.0113%30 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0435%30 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0212%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0026%24 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0213%24 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0216%24 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0122%23 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0420%23 Sept →
anubis13–80.0113%23 Sept →
cache13–90.1026%26 Jul →
inferno13–70.0719%3 Jul →
cache12–120.0424%3 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0019%3 Jul →
office13–4-0.0120%23 Jun →
dust20–2-0.090%23 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0914%23 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0316%23 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0012%23 Jun →
mirage2–130.0122%11 Jun →
nuke12–120.0923%11 Jun →
dust20–6-0.0911%11 Jun →
cache13–40.0821%2 Jun →
dust22–13-0.076%2 Jun →
mirage10–130.0619%2 Jun →
inferno11–130.0324%25 May →
dust215–19-0.0420%25 May →
dust213–11-0.0016%23 May →
anubis7–13-0.0116%23 May →
anubis13–11-0.0016%23 May →
nuke3–13-0.0319%22 May →
dust213–60.1519%22 May →
inferno13–30.2631%22 May →
mirage12–120.0920%22 May →
nuke0–13-0.089%21 May →
mirage9–130.0434%21 May →
ancient13–50.0829%18 May →
dust213–7-0.0115%17 May →
mirage5–130.0123%17 May →
office6–13-0.0518%16 May →
anubis7–13-0.063%16 May →
dust23–13-0.039%16 May →
mirage10–13-0.0516%16 May →
dust20–13-0.1210%16 May →
nuke10–130.0116%14 May →
dust26–13-0.0835%14 May →
dust29–13-0.0411%12 May →
dust213–11-0.0328%10 May →
dust213–8-0.0410%7 May →
inferno13–6-0.0318%7 May →
mirage11–13-0.0419%6 May →
nuke13–9-0.0713%6 May →
inferno13–11-0.0117%5 May →
office13–6-0.0733%3 May →
office12–120.0331%3 May →
dust25–13-0.0821%3 May →
cache13–110.0128%29 Apr →
cache13–80.0638%29 Apr →
office13–20.0123%29 Apr →
cache3–13-0.0218%29 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0128%27 Apr →
inferno13–90.0420%26 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0427%26 Apr →
dust213–70.0825%26 Apr →
office13–5-0.059%25 Apr →
mirage2–13-0.0727%25 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0018%25 Apr →
mirage13–5-0.0013%25 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0320%19 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0427%19 Apr →
mirage14–16-0.0124%23 Feb →
dust29–130.0120%23 Feb →
nuke13–10.0426%23 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0523%15 Feb →
nuke13–100.0122%15 Feb →
anubis13–4-0.0019%15 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0315%14 Feb →
dust216–140.0119%8 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0619%5 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0619%5 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0129%3 Feb →
mirage13–60.0418%31 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.0214%26 Jan →
nuke13–110.0325%25 Jan →
anubis13–110.0432%20 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.0218%18 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0220%18 Jan →
dust213–30.0425%18 Jan →
inferno13–110.1834%16 Jan →
anubis10–130.0316%16 Jan →
dust213–80.0834%16 Jan →
nuke13–60.0327%16 Jan →
mirage13–110.1428%16 Jan →
nuke11–130.0121%13 Jan →
dust212–120.0933%13 Jan →
mirage13–20.1133%13 Jan →
inferno7–130.0329%13 Jan →
dust213–70.0322%11 Jan →
ancient10–130.0014%11 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.044%11 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0921%5 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.