shake my smh......... — CS2 Stats

76561198058119445[U:1:97853717]

3,640Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,562Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4549 of 28544 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGshake my smh.........PREMIER24,562 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning47
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51436Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression4.4
Utility4.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.7
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time547ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — vertigo 13–9
132Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2391439%-0.02
anubisA1911858%-0.01
mirageA1911858%-0.01
nukeB158753%0.00
cacheS96367%0.00
infernoD51420%0.00
dust242250%-0.01
vertigo32167%0.04
overpass21150%-0.04
train1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

830Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
79.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17846%0.9415.0
Ancient16456%0.9915.4
Anubis16153%0.9715.2
Nuke11155%1.0216.4
Vertigo6157%1.0516.6
Dust24933%0.8315.3
Inferno3546%0.9414.3
Overpass1136%0.6913.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
547msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
6.97HE damage / grenade
5.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4375 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.752% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.0430%27 Aug
ancient2–13-0.098%27 Aug
dust213–100.0318%27 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1112%27 Aug
ancient13–60.058%26 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0313%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0216%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0112%25 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0517%25 Aug
cache16–13-0.0520%24 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0216%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0314%24 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0210%23 Aug
nuke13–9-0.077%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0116%22 Aug
ancient8–130.0113%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0310%22 Aug
cache13–40.0513%21 Aug
vertigo13–90.0924%21 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0519%20 Aug
cache13–30.0029%20 Aug
nuke13–70.0226%20 Aug
cache10–13-0.0321%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0412%10 Aug
anubis13–100.0519%6 Aug
nuke12–160.0522%6 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0130%5 Aug
cache9–130.0024%4 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0621%3 Aug
inferno2–80.0323%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.027%2 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0117%2 Aug
mirage1–7-0.0720%1 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0524%1 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0416%1 Aug
mirage13–2-0.024%30 Jul
cache13–50.0417%30 Jul
anubis5–130.0017%29 Jul
ancient13–30.0517%28 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0520%28 Jul
anubis13–70.0219%28 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0612%27 Jul
nuke13–70.0815%27 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0018%27 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0510%27 Jul
cache13–30.0111%27 Jul
anubis13–20.0310%26 Jul
ancient13–90.0520%26 Jul
nuke13–40.0819%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0116%26 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0411%26 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0316%14 Jul
nuke2–130.0020%14 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0115%13 Jul
inferno13–20.0424%13 Jul
dust213–3-0.0518%13 Jul
anubis13–50.0216%13 Jul
cache13–70.0114%13 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0110%13 Jul
mirage13–40.0831%13 Jul
nuke13–9-0.059%7 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0311%6 Jul
vertigo13–30.0626%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.089%1 Jul
anubis13–110.0212%1 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0120%30 Jun
nuke13–50.0311%29 Jun
anubis8–13-0.076%29 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0211%29 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0626%24 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0621%24 Jun
ancient11–13-0.003%24 Jun
train12–120.0415%21 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0318%20 Jun
nuke12–12-0.0218%20 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0813%20 Jun
anubis13–50.0623%20 Jun
inferno4–130.0219%20 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0210%19 Jun
mirage13–30.038%19 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0617%19 Jun
mirage13–50.0121%18 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0216%18 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0223%18 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0611%16 Jun
overpass16–13-0.0713%16 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0319%16 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0014%15 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0114%15 Jun
inferno10–130.0121%15 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0020%14 Jun
ancient13–90.0316%14 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0714%14 Jun
mirage10–130.0013%12 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0429%12 Jun
dust215–15-0.0214%11 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0017%11 Jun
mirage11–130.0719%10 Jun
ancient8–13-0.066%9 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0017%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →