kwaithex

kwaithex — CS2 Stats

76561198057757979[U:1:97492251]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,820Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,697Top 5% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7990 of 257810 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,769 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,820 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,697 +114 29 Nov – 8 Oct · 43 days played
24,74829,214peak 29,21429 Nov8 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,769 +0 3 Sept – 8 Oct · 4 observations
2,7692,769peak 2,7693 Sept8 Oct
29,214Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,769Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2025-11-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,769
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 231 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,517 below peak (29,214)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,303 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkwaithexFACEITLevel 10 · 2,769 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,697 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,769csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning46
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–41–1Last 10058%Win rateWLLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.9

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time541ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 6 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · anubis, 11 Mar →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 27 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 25 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2916–1355%0.01
mirageA2415–963%0.00
ancientA138–562%0.01
anubisB136–746%-0.00
infernoC94–544%0.03
nukeS86–275%0.03
overpass—21–150%-0.02
cache—11–0100%0.03
train—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
538msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
12.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2779% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–50.1721%6 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0816%27 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0722%30 May →
dust213–30.0437%29 May →
ancient9–13-0.0218%27 May →
dust213–00.1427%25 May →
mirage0–13-0.0325%23 May →
dust25–13-0.0124%23 May →
nuke13–00.000%23 May →
ancient13–60.0525%19 May →
dust210–13-0.0028%18 May →
mirage22–19-0.0318%18 May →
anubis13–90.0721%30 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0611%30 Apr →
anubis1–13-0.0811%28 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0616%28 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0417%27 Apr →
nuke13–70.0816%27 Apr →
dust24–130.0131%27 Apr →
cache13–50.0313%27 Apr →
mirage13–3-0.016%24 Apr →
inferno3–130.0920%22 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0123%13 Apr →
dust213–100.0230%12 Apr →
dust215–19-0.0219%10 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.046%9 Apr →
dust210–130.0423%9 Apr →
anubis10–130.0217%26 Mar →
dust213–8-0.0334%18 Mar →
anubis0–2-0.06100%11 Mar →
dust211–130.0714%11 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0629%11 Mar →
dust27–130.0013%10 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0322%9 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0018%4 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0131%3 Mar →
inferno2–90.0239%2 Mar →
nuke3–5-0.0011%1 Mar →
dust216–14-0.0629%28 Feb →
mirage13–30.0224%27 Feb →
anubis16–140.0321%27 Feb →
dust25–13-0.085%26 Feb →
ancient13–90.0124%25 Feb →
mirage16–120.0719%22 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0426%21 Feb →
mirage13–40.0634%20 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0217%19 Feb →
dust210–130.0520%18 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0624%17 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0316%17 Feb →
ancient13–80.0122%16 Feb →
mirage13–40.0120%16 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.0216%15 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0327%13 Feb →
inferno15–15-0.0330%12 Feb →
dust219–16-0.0030%12 Feb →
inferno13–100.0227%11 Feb →
mirage13–2-0.0125%11 Feb →
nuke13–100.0234%10 Feb →
inferno13–100.0632%9 Feb →
ancient16–140.0525%9 Feb →
ancient13–80.0812%8 Feb →
anubis8–130.0222%7 Feb →
nuke13–20.1022%4 Feb →
dust216–13-0.0017%4 Feb →
nuke13–80.1431%4 Feb →
anubis13–80.0924%4 Feb →
mirage13–160.0033%3 Feb →
ancient13–90.0726%3 Feb →
dust213–40.0524%2 Feb →
ancient13–90.0622%2 Feb →
mirage13–30.0934%2 Feb →
dust213–30.0815%2 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.049%1 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0131%1 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0018%1 Feb →
anubis13–80.0132%29 Jan →
overpass10–13-0.0123%29 Jan →
mirage11–130.0522%29 Jan →
mirage13–50.0531%29 Jan →
anubis19–150.0024%27 Jan →
mirage13–70.0746%27 Jan →
dust213–10.0423%27 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0628%27 Jan →
mirage13–6-0.0131%26 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.0210%26 Jan →
inferno13–70.0024%17 Jan →
dust25–130.0035%17 Jan →
dust213–30.0430%16 Jan →
train13–8-0.0128%11 Jan →
ancient13–20.0219%11 Jan →
dust213–8-0.0025%2 Jan →
mirage16–19-0.0421%20 Dec →
dust213–10-0.0220%12 Dec →
mirage13–40.0117%11 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0740%2 Dec →
dust213–60.0521%2 Dec →
nuke13–80.0018%29 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0230%29 Nov →
overpass13–9-0.038%21 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.