s⅃ı̣me

s⅃ı̣me — CS2 Stats

AT76561198056992694[U:1:96726966]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,685Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,234Top 10% of 206,528 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11261 of 253726 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,758 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,234 +1,487 14 Jul – 14 Oct · 24 days played
24,74726,669peak 26,66914 Jul14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,758 +0 4 Sept – 18 Sept · 4 observations
1,7581,758peak 1,7584 Sept18 Sept
27,078Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,758Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,758
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 243 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 435 below peak (26,669)
  • +626 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,487 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,766 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGs⅃ı̣meFACEITLevel 9 · 1,758 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,234 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,758csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning56
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–37–2Last 10061%Win rateLWLWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 55% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time539ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 26 Aug →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · inferno, 5 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 24 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 79% over 14infernoWeakest map · 50% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2113–862%0.02
mirageB1910–953%0.01
infernoB168–850%0.01
ancientS1411–379%0.02
nukeA149–564%0.05
cacheA95–456%0.03
anubis—42–250%-0.01
rush_001—11–0100%-0.00
overpass—11–0100%-0.04
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

442Matches
55%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
84.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
34%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5349%1.2217.3
Dust24953%1.2617.8
Inferno3158%1.3917.9
Ancient2383%1.4017.5
Anubis1540%1.0813.9
Nuke1573%1.5117.0
Cache862%1.6017.9
Overpass633%0.9816.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
537msReaction time
55.0%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
6.22HE damage / grenade
11.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.4253% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0021%14 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0129%14 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0250%14 Oct →
dust213–110.0118%13 Oct →
ancient16–140.0317%13 Oct →
dust213–90.039%13 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0713%13 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0511%13 Oct →
ancient10–130.0313%13 Oct →
inferno10–130.0012%13 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0821%13 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0525%13 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0118%13 Oct →
cache13–90.0117%12 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0328%12 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0210%12 Oct →
mirage13–40.0530%11 Oct →
inferno6–130.0114%11 Oct →
rush_0015–1-0.000%5 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0664%5 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0531%5 Oct →
mirage13–80.0515%5 Oct →
inferno13–70.1025%5 Oct →
mirage9–130.0317%5 Oct →
dust215–19-0.0218%5 Oct →
mirage13–30.0711%5 Oct →
nuke9–50.0223%4 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.1530%4 Oct →
nuke13–90.0716%3 Oct →
nuke11–130.0317%3 Oct →
overpass13–4-0.045%29 Sept →
nuke13–70.0317%29 Sept →
dust213–30.0718%29 Sept →
dust210–130.0715%28 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.045%28 Sept →
mirage13–90.019%28 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0124%26 Sept →
cache13–50.0121%25 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0116%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.0838%25 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0110%25 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.019%25 Sept →
cache12–120.0017%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.0714%24 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0627%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.0028%24 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0517%24 Sept →
mirage10–130.0614%24 Sept →
inferno13–1-0.020%24 Sept →
dust213–90.058%24 Sept →
inferno13–70.0512%24 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0328%24 Sept →
nuke14–160.0421%24 Sept →
anubis9–130.0930%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0416%23 Sept →
ancient13–110.0121%23 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0327%23 Sept →
nuke2–130.0436%23 Sept →
inferno7–130.0526%22 Sept →
nuke13–40.1114%22 Sept →
inferno11–130.0317%22 Sept →
dust215–150.0519%22 Sept →
inferno13–70.0311%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.017%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.0526%5 Sept →
nuke6–130.0819%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.0411%5 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0219%5 Sept →
dust213–70.0815%4 Sept →
ancient13–50.0322%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0714%27 Aug →
vertigo13–9-0.019%27 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0120%27 Aug →
nuke13–90.1427%27 Aug →
ancient13–90.0720%27 Aug →
dust26–130.0523%27 Aug →
ancient13–20.1221%27 Aug →
cache11–130.0917%27 Aug →
mirage5–130.0016%27 Aug →
inferno19–150.0317%26 Aug →
nuke13–70.0711%26 Aug →
cache13–60.0318%26 Aug →
dust213–110.0224%26 Aug →
cache13–20.159%26 Aug →
mirage13–30.0516%25 Aug →
dust28–130.0318%18 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0527%16 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0224%13 Aug →
dust213–60.0317%13 Aug →
nuke13–50.0524%12 Aug →
inferno13–110.0121%12 Aug →
ancient13–20.0818%11 Aug →
dust213–10.0214%14 Jul →
cache11–130.0226%14 Jul →
ancient13–90.0117%14 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0619%14 Jul →
mirage13–80.1420%13 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0128%13 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.059%13 Jul →
dust213–110.0918%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.