autimatic — CS2 Stats

PRO“Made In China”Free AgentUnited StatesRiflerSettings & gear profile →

US76561198054870849[U:1:94605121]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,857Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2Days observed since 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning58

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateLLLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8

Aggression5.2

Utility7.5

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.8

Utility7.5

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time533ms+7ms

first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms

Headshot accuracy22.3%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–0Biggest win — mirage

9Longest win streak

L4Current streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 86% over 7nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	37	22–15	59%	0.04
ancient	A	20	11–9	55%	0.02
dust2	B	19	10–9	53%	0.02
anubis	S	10	7–3	70%	0.02
inferno	S	7	6–1	86%	0.03
nuke	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,224Matches

58%Win rate

1.33Avg K/D

92.8ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

30Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	292	65%	1.47	19.1
Ancient	170	61%	1.34	16.4
Dust2	143	67%	1.40	18.5
Anubis	96	64%	1.48	17.8
Inferno	42	79%	1.35	14.6
Nuke	33	61%	1.45	19.3
Vertigo	22	55%	1.14	14.7
Overpass	19	74%	1.53	17.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy

39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.1%Spray accuracy

81.1%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

529msReaction time

27.8%T opening success

47.6%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

12.2%Flash assists

11.55HE damage / grenade

11.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.7581% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.05	14%	31 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	16%	31 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	29%	30 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.02	17%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.08	33%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	27%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	31%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.03	21%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.07	15%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.04	9%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.09	34%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.10	23%	21 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	23%	14 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	16%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.06	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.14	29%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	14%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.04	37%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.11	18%	8 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.04	24%	7 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	28%	7 Jul →
mirage	19–15	0.04	19%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	31%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	13%	3 Jul →
mirage	17–19	0.03	23%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.01	17%	3 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	27%	1 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	17%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	21%	30 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.06	29%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.00	24%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.02	16%	27 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	21%	22 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	23%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	28%	21 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	36%	8 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	26%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.05	18%	19 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	20%	19 May →
mirage	13–11	0.01	18%	15 May →
dust2	13–11	0.00	15%	14 May →
mirage	13–3	0.18	18%	14 May →
mirage	16–13	0.02	21%	11 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	30%	11 May →
nuke	13–3	0.02	17%	9 May →
ancient	10–13	0.06	40%	9 May →
anubis	13–6	0.01	27%	9 May →
mirage	13–3	0.22	27%	8 May →
anubis	16–14	0.02	30%	7 May →
anubis	13–11	0.03	27%	6 May →
anubis	4–13	-0.02	21%	1 May →
mirage	8–13	0.01	16%	30 Apr →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	22%	29 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.13	29%	22 Apr →
anubis	11–13	0.00	19%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.05	22%	21 Apr →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	54%	20 Apr →
nuke	11–13	0.02	19%	20 Apr →
overpass	13–0	0.12	19%	20 Apr →
dust2	17–19	0.07	25%	20 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	20%	19 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.11	23%	19 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.10	27%	17 Apr →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	21%	17 Apr →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	16%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.03	19%	14 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.04	23%	9 Apr →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	21%	7 Apr →
ancient	5–13	0.04	12%	4 Apr →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	15%	31 Mar →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	17%	30 Mar →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	10%	29 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.01	24%	26 Mar →
dust2	13–8	0.03	24%	22 Mar →
anubis	13–7	0.02	21%	21 Mar →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	18%	20 Mar →
ancient	3–13	-0.05	17%	18 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.07	17%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.07	21%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.02	22%	12 Mar →
dust2	13–1	0.04	26%	8 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.05	32%	13 Nov →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	24%	1 Nov →
mirage	13–3	0.06	21%	1 Nov →
mirage	13–11	0.11	33%	28 Oct →
anubis	16–13	0.03	19%	28 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	24%	27 Oct →
anubis	13–9	0.14	35%	27 Oct →
mirage	2–13	0.05	30%	27 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.09	25%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.10	23%	27 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	14%	27 Oct →
ancient	13–7	0.06	26%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	20%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–11	0.04	24%	23 Oct →
ancient	13–5	0.06	18%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.02	21%	10 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	19%	9 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.03	20%	8 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	10%	3 Oct →