JetBlacK0311 — CS2 Stats

76561198052843297[U:1:92577569]✓ No bans

3,786Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,014Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3390 of 15888 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,149 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJetBlacK0311FACEITLevel 10 · 2,149 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,014 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning50
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression5.2
Utility6.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time506ms−97ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–4
130Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB24111346%0.00
infernoC2291341%-0.01
cacheA2112957%0.02
dust2S128467%0.02
anubisA127558%0.01
nukeD81713%-0.04
mirage1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,052Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
80.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno36858%1.2416.9
Anubis28452%1.2617.0
Ancient21551%1.1716.6
Nuke17742%1.1215.7
Dust217742%1.0515.1
Overpass7946%1.1115.6
Train2162%1.2116.4
Cache1953%1.1818.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
42.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
504msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
7.20HE damage / grenade
11.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5728% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–130.0225%27 Aug
ancient16–140.0521%26 Aug
cache13–110.1125%26 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0114%26 Aug
dust25–130.038%24 Aug
ancient9–130.029%24 Aug
ancient13–10.0421%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0221%24 Aug
cache7–13-0.0616%24 Aug
anubis13–70.0117%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0518%24 Aug
dust213–6-0.0224%23 Aug
ancient11–130.0818%22 Aug
dust213–110.0715%21 Aug
cache16–140.0018%21 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0110%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0326%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0112%20 Aug
dust23–13-0.0614%20 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0811%19 Aug
anubis16–140.0424%18 Aug
ancient13–30.0820%18 Aug
cache10–13-0.0018%17 Aug
inferno10–130.0022%17 Aug
cache13–90.0729%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0013%17 Aug
dust213–70.0919%17 Aug
inferno13–80.0511%17 Aug
dust23–13-0.0625%17 Aug
cache7–13-0.0124%17 Aug
dust216–140.0210%16 Aug
cache6–130.0119%16 Aug
dust210–130.0223%16 Aug
cache13–110.0422%16 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0119%16 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0016%15 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0114%15 Aug
inferno10–130.0110%15 Aug
cache9–13-0.0311%15 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0615%15 Aug
ancient13–40.038%15 Aug
cache13–5-0.019%15 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0718%14 Aug
anubis13–100.0123%14 Aug
inferno9–40.0717%14 Aug
ancient6–130.0425%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0313%14 Aug
inferno16–130.0622%14 Aug
dust213–10.0443%14 Aug
anubis13–00.0531%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0337%13 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0310%13 Aug
cache19–160.0527%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0223%12 Aug
ancient13–100.0417%12 Aug
cache3–13-0.060%12 Aug
cache12–120.0328%11 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0510%11 Aug
inferno16–130.0117%11 Aug
cache13–50.0313%11 Aug
ancient14–160.0617%10 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0126%10 Aug
nuke13–50.0116%10 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0121%9 Aug
cache13–80.009%9 Aug
dust213–50.0616%9 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0130%8 Aug
dust213–70.068%7 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0019%7 Aug
inferno13–00.1123%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0114%7 Aug
ancient8–130.019%5 Aug
cache13–9-0.0012%5 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0220%4 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0933%4 Aug
cache13–40.0310%4 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0818%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0219%3 Aug
inferno8–130.028%3 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0315%3 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0821%3 Aug
inferno13–80.0510%3 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0324%31 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0110%31 Jul
ancient7–130.0310%31 Jul
inferno3–9-0.280%31 Jul
inferno2–9-0.2111%31 Jul
inferno9–10.1124%31 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0214%30 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0119%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0411%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0317%30 Jul
anubis13–100.0418%29 Jul
cache13–5-0.0213%29 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0433%29 Jul
anubis13–70.0619%28 Jul
cache13–40.1616%28 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0213%28 Jul
inferno5–130.0023%28 Jul
nuke0–9-0.1829%28 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →