Dr. Rick Dagless M.D.

Dr. Rick Dagless M.D. — CS2 Stats

76561198051637596[U:1:91371868]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,842Tracked matches75%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.9 ElitePositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,479Top 1% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1874 of 252455 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,548 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,479 -1,389 4 Jul – 10 Oct · 18 days played
23,16130,008peak 30,0084 Jul10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,548 +0 31 Aug – 24 Sept · 3 observations
2,5482,548peak 2,54831 Aug24 Sept
30,122Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,548Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,548
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 452 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,529 below peak (30,008)
  • +3,480 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,529 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,521 to go
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDr. Rick Dagless M.D.FACEITLevel 10 · 2,548 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,479 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,548csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning83
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–35–6Last 10059%Win rateWLTLWWWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.8pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 20

  • 14–4–2 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility6.6
Positioning8.3
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashesStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 72% on T to 55% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning8.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels8.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.9/10 (Elite), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time477ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 517ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms
Headshot accuracy30.8%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 30.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 9 Aug →
49%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 6 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 3 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 79% over 14mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2617–965%0.06
anubisB179–853%0.06
cacheS1411–379%0.09
nukeS139–469%0.11
mirageD133–1023%0.06
infernoS97–278%0.10
dust2D62–433%0.07
vertigo—10–10%0.16
overpass—11–0100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

605Matches
56%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
85.9ADR
64%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17755%1.2217.2
Ancient11854%1.2518.2
Anubis9057%1.4318.8
Nuke4551%1.3318.4
Dust24344%1.2718.0
Inferno2756%1.4919.9
Overpass1759%1.1517.6
Vertigo1242%0.9714.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.4%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
473msReaction time
72.4%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
13.1%Flash assists
10.49HE damage / grenade
11.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.1039%10 Oct →
ancient14–160.0430%7 Oct →
dust212–120.0525%5 Oct →
inferno10–130.0324%5 Oct →
inferno13–60.0647%5 Oct →
inferno13–70.1438%29 Sept →
nuke13–30.1341%29 Sept →
cache13–90.2033%28 Sept →
ancient13–160.0224%28 Sept →
mirage12–120.0327%27 Sept →
inferno13–20.0319%27 Sept →
nuke13–40.2027%14 Sept →
ancient13–90.0623%12 Sept →
anubis16–130.1015%11 Sept →
ancient12–00.0738%11 Sept →
ancient6–2-0.0725%11 Sept →
cache13–20.0329%11 Sept →
mirage13–50.1528%11 Sept →
ancient13–70.0321%11 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0236%11 Sept →
nuke10–130.0836%11 Sept →
ancient13–40.1735%11 Sept →
anubis13–10.0130%11 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0731%11 Sept →
nuke14–160.0528%11 Sept →
nuke13–30.0827%11 Sept →
anubis13–20.1132%11 Sept →
cache13–00.1941%10 Sept →
inferno13–80.0740%10 Sept →
inferno13–70.1738%8 Sept →
nuke11–130.0640%8 Sept →
inferno5–130.0823%7 Sept →
anubis14–160.0728%7 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0020%7 Sept →
inferno13–30.0935%7 Sept →
mirage10–130.1937%6 Sept →
vertigo10–130.1634%6 Sept →
mirage8–130.1432%6 Sept →
dust210–130.1120%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0322%6 Sept →
dust213–30.1949%6 Sept →
nuke13–20.1828%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.0720%5 Sept →
mirage10–130.1323%5 Sept →
anubis13–70.0626%5 Sept →
ancient10–10.0125%5 Sept →
cache13–100.0830%3 Sept →
anubis13–90.0937%3 Sept →
cache6–130.0826%3 Sept →
anubis15–150.0217%3 Sept →
mirage7–130.0429%3 Sept →
anubis13–50.1019%2 Sept →
nuke13–60.1231%2 Sept →
ancient13–50.0734%2 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0323%2 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0125%2 Sept →
mirage8–130.0322%30 Aug →
ancient13–100.0930%30 Aug →
cache13–40.0716%23 Aug →
ancient13–90.0725%21 Aug →
cache13–50.0441%20 Aug →
ancient13–60.0327%20 Aug →
cache13–80.0429%20 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0820%12 Aug →
mirage14–160.0342%11 Aug →
cache13–90.0626%10 Aug →
nuke13–20.2532%9 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0324%6 Aug →
ancient13–110.0625%31 Jul →
anubis13–40.0924%29 Jul →
cache13–90.1423%11 Jul →
ancient9–130.0820%11 Jul →
mirage13–90.0831%11 Jul →
anubis13–60.1730%11 Jul →
cache13–60.0428%10 Jul →
ancient13–40.1439%10 Jul →
mirage9–130.0236%10 Jul →
anubis8–130.1126%10 Jul →
cache3–130.0828%10 Jul →
ancient16–130.1030%7 Jul →
ancient9–130.1124%5 Jul →
dust24–130.0739%5 Jul →
anubis13–160.0029%5 Jul →
anubis13–100.0232%5 Jul →
ancient13–90.0624%5 Jul →
mirage15–150.0332%4 Jul →
ancient15–150.0329%4 Jul →
mirage13–80.0324%4 Jul →
dust213–110.0429%4 Jul →
anubis11–130.0538%4 Jul →
cache6–130.0738%4 Jul →
ancient13–80.1130%4 Jul →
nuke13–70.0730%4 Jul →
anubis10–130.0231%3 Jul →
nuke4–130.1035%3 Jul →
overpass13–50.1531%3 Jul →
inferno13–20.2329%3 Jul →
ancient12–120.0826%3 Jul →
nuke13–40.1026%3 Jul →
ancient9–130.1124%3 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.