RaKiiS

RaKiiS — CS2 Stats

76561198051117955[U:1:90852227]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,231Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,972Purple band · top ~24.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,444 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,972 +354 7 Aug – 17 Oct · 28 days played
14,22916,532peak 16,5327 Aug17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,444 +0 28 Aug – 22 Sept · 2 observations
1,4441,444peak 1,44428 Aug22 Sept
16,582Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,444Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,444
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 87 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 560 below peak (16,532)
  • +637 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,028 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRaKiiSFACEITLevel 6 · 1,444 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,972 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,444csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning48
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · +70ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 686ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time591ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 4 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 9 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · nuke, 18 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2112–957%0.02
infernoC207–1335%0.00
ancientB168–850%0.00
mirageD124–833%-0.00
nukeB115–645%0.02
cacheA116–555%0.01
anubisA85–363%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,127Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
75.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12046%0.9113.5
Dust210949%1.0514.5
Ancient6948%1.1216.9
Anubis6545%1.0315.4
Inferno6359%0.9814.7
Nuke5850%1.0315.7
Overpass2568%0.9914.7
Train1145%1.1217.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
583msReaction time
59.1%T opening success
29.4%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
10.78HE damage / grenade
7.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.404% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.063%17 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0117%14 Oct →
mirage13–110.0015%11 Oct →
dust213–40.0021%11 Oct →
nuke13–70.0715%11 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0413%10 Oct →
dust213–10-0.009%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0417%9 Oct →
inferno7–130.0116%8 Oct →
cache7–130.0025%19 Sept →
inferno9–130.0324%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0414%18 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0117%18 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0019%18 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0320%18 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0513%18 Sept →
dust213–30.0613%16 Sept →
anubis16–120.0421%15 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0715%15 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0632%15 Sept →
ancient13–50.0629%15 Sept →
cache13–100.0219%13 Sept →
nuke11–130.0510%12 Sept →
dust213–60.0835%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0420%10 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0650%9 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0312%9 Sept →
cache13–100.0428%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0914%8 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0332%7 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0116%7 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0813%6 Sept →
cache15–150.0123%6 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0121%6 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0215%4 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0126%4 Sept →
ancient13–90.0719%4 Sept →
dust29–130.0315%4 Sept →
dust213–40.1434%4 Sept →
cache13–30.1326%4 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0425%31 Aug →
mirage11–130.0027%31 Aug →
inferno13–30.0126%31 Aug →
ancient13–50.0418%31 Aug →
dust213–50.0526%31 Aug →
inferno13–60.0323%30 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0613%30 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0413%21 Aug →
inferno7–130.0122%21 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0715%21 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0411%21 Aug →
dust26–130.0222%21 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0317%20 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0220%20 Aug →
inferno13–30.0613%19 Aug →
ancient13–60.0817%19 Aug →
inferno13–70.0515%19 Aug →
dust213–80.0210%18 Aug →
nuke13–10.0616%18 Aug →
mirage13–60.0713%18 Aug →
inferno16–130.0420%17 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0318%17 Aug →
nuke10–130.0511%17 Aug →
inferno13–70.0520%17 Aug →
dust213–60.0413%17 Aug →
dust213–90.0529%16 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0710%16 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0321%16 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0717%16 Aug →
anubis13–60.0824%16 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0328%16 Aug →
inferno4–130.0519%16 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0220%15 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0227%15 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0217%15 Aug →
nuke12–160.0323%15 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0328%15 Aug →
ancient13–10.0817%15 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0428%15 Aug →
mirage13–10.0423%15 Aug →
dust29–130.0425%15 Aug →
ancient13–60.0134%15 Aug →
nuke10–130.0313%13 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0926%13 Aug →
ancient16–130.0425%13 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.0627%13 Aug →
mirage10–130.0216%13 Aug →
dust213–100.0518%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.0226%12 Aug →
nuke13–110.0419%12 Aug →
anubis12–160.0116%8 Aug →
inferno9–130.0827%8 Aug →
anubis6–130.0419%8 Aug →
dust29–130.0729%8 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.043%7 Aug →
dust213–7-0.019%7 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0519%6 Aug →
cache16–140.0314%6 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0418%6 Aug →
cache13–50.0113%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.