cLip^

cLip^ — CS2 Stats

76561198049933663[U:1:89667935]Steam profile ↗

594Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,255Purple band · top ~11.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8129 of 16613 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcLip^FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,255 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning30
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateWLWWTLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression2.2
Utility4.8
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch6.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning3.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time545ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 25infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35191654%-0.00
cacheA25151060%-0.02
mirageD113827%0.01
anubisA116555%-0.02
ancientA74357%0.01
infernoD71614%-0.03
nuke3030%-0.04
overpass110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,586Matches
51%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
83.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2888%1.1415.5
Anubis425%0.9214.8
Cache2100%1.1819.0
Inferno10%1.5024.0
Mirage1100%1.1425.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
549msReaction time
23.3%T opening success
34.9%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
8.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2502% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.128%28 Aug
ancient1–3-0.0020%26 Aug
overpass13–2-0.0519%24 Aug
mirage13–50.0220%24 Aug
dust215–15-0.0417%24 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0219%24 Aug
cache11–13-0.0816%23 Aug
dust213–16-0.0711%23 Aug
dust213–80.0116%23 Aug
dust26–130.0427%21 Aug
ancient13–50.0020%21 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0522%21 Aug
dust213–9-0.0019%21 Aug
cache13–60.0417%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0724%21 Aug
dust210–130.0213%20 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0323%20 Aug
dust213–11-0.0320%19 Aug
cache13–5-0.0116%18 Aug
dust213–00.0731%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0522%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.0224%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.029%17 Aug
inferno8–80.0130%17 Aug
dust213–30.0641%15 Aug
dust24–130.0830%14 Aug
nuke7–9-0.018%14 Aug
inferno7–9-0.124%14 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0219%14 Aug
inferno8–80.0825%14 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1830%13 Aug
dust24–130.0131%29 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0214%29 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0135%28 Jul
dust213–6-0.0217%28 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0727%28 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0013%28 Jul
dust213–50.0330%28 Jul
cache13–70.0722%28 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0118%27 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0433%27 Jul
dust213–5-0.0330%27 Jul
cache13–90.0121%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0315%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0527%26 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0129%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.0011%26 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0526%26 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0326%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0512%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.0625%26 Jul
cache13–9-0.0124%22 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0222%22 Jul
cache13–10-0.0618%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0214%21 Jul
inferno7–130.0017%21 Jul
dust213–10-0.0015%20 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0610%20 Jul
dust29–13-0.0829%19 Jul
cache13–70.0521%19 Jul
ancient2–00.02100%19 Jul
dust213–60.0718%19 Jul
dust213–110.0924%19 Jul
dust213–30.0230%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0810%18 Jul
cache13–3-0.0415%18 Jul
cache11–13-0.0929%18 Jul
cache13–30.0814%18 Jul
dust215–150.0122%18 Jul
anubis15–150.0122%18 Jul
mirage13–70.1021%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0727%16 Jul
dust213–20.1244%16 Jul
mirage7–130.0224%16 Jul
dust29–13-0.0321%16 Jul
cache1–80.026%16 Jul
cache13–7-0.0715%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.0621%15 Jul
dust21–6-0.0450%15 Jul
cache13–100.0313%15 Jul
ancient13–40.1442%14 Jul
cache6–130.0315%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.0621%13 Jul
mirage13–40.0916%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.0115%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.1013%12 Jul
mirage14–160.0120%12 Jul
dust213–40.0219%12 Jul
cache13–60.0114%12 Jul
anubis13–110.0121%11 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0312%11 Jul
dust213–80.108%11 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0324%11 Jul
dust21–13-0.0327%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.0611%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.047%11 Jul
cache10–13-0.0420%10 Jul
cache13–90.0219%10 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0221%10 Jul
dust21–13-0.0414%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →