Battlecat — CS2 Stats

SC76561198048438727[U:1:88172999]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,115Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,675Purple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19214 of 41276 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,083 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning66

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–51–6Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression10.0

Utility5.0

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels5.6

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 74% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 74% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning6.6

Utility5.0

Mechanics4.4

Opening Duels5.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time536ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms

Headshot accuracy25.1%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–0

13–1Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 21nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	22	10–12	45%	0.03
mirage	A	21	12–9	57%	0.04
ancient	B	17	8–9	47%	0.02
cache	C	17	6–11	35%	0.02
nuke	D	11	3–8	27%	0.03
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	0.03
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	0.04
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,077Matches

51%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

76.7ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	104	62%	1.32	17.1
Mirage	97	46%	1.02	15.2
Nuke	69	52%	1.22	16.3
Dust2	64	36%	1.13	17.0
Ancient	54	48%	1.06	15.0
Overpass	25	68%	1.25	16.6
Vertigo	14	50%	1.31	17.4
Anubis	13	31%	0.96	13.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy

38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.2%Spray accuracy

69.7%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

527msReaction time

30.9%T opening success

73.7%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

4.5%Flash assists

5.54HE damage / grenade

14.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4541 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.9043% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–6	0.09	25%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	35%	27 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.01	30%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.14	23%	27 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	16%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	38%	25 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	18%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.03	28%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	39%	24 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	10%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.04	38%	24 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	28%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	26%	20 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	21%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	16%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	23%	18 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	44%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	43%	16 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.00	21%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	15%	15 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.13	18%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	22%	14 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.07	42%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–9	-0.01	27%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	13%	13 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	30%	12 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.07	17%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	12%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.00	24%	10 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	18%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.11	26%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	18%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	14%	3 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	9%	3 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.00	8%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.04	22%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	22%	2 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.05	17%	31 Jul →
ancient	12–16	0.02	19%	31 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	16%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.00	18%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	13%	29 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.06	24%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	14%	29 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.10	5%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.06	23%	27 Jul →
inferno	9–0	0.22	44%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.03	18%	26 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	16%	26 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	16%	25 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	27%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.06	26%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	29%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.00	17%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	21%	24 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	18%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.07	27%	23 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.04	24%	23 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	26%	23 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	23%	23 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.02	46%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	28%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.01	29%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.07	31%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.02	37%	23 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.09	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.01	26%	22 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.11	22%	22 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.03	29%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.11	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	26%	21 Jul →
inferno	9–4	-0.06	78%	21 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	28%	20 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.09	24%	20 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.04	21%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.22	26%	20 Jul →
inferno	2–9	-0.10	15%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	26%	5 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.08	26%	5 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.05	20%	5 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.07	25%	5 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	26%	30 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.06	31%	29 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.08	16%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.06	18%	29 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.05	26%	29 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.16	28%	28 Jun →
overpass	13–16	0.07	18%	28 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.01	34%	24 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.03	19%	18 Jun →
inferno	1–13	-0.03	38%	12 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.07	21%	11 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	23%	11 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.00	17%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.01	47%	5 Jun →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price