lilja

lilja — CS2 Stats

SE76561198047873337[U:1:87607609]Steam profile ↗

1,346Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,190Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1238 of 34087 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

26,864Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,190
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,810 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGliljaFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,190 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning49
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43516Last 10043%Win rateWWWLTLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.2
Aggression4.4
Utility5.6
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning4.9
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time550ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–4
131Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 54% over 13ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB21101148%0.04
dust2B21101148%0.03
mirageC1971237%0.01
infernoB137654%0.05
nukeB105550%0.01
ancientD92722%-0.01
anubis41325%0.03
overpass21150%-0.03
office1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,014Matches
50%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
91.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis520%1.3320.0
Inferno520%1.3524.0
Mirage540%1.2418.8
Ancient425%0.9516.3
Dust2475%1.3421.8
Nuke3100%1.5120.0
Train1100%1.8129.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.1%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
536msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
9.65HE damage / grenade
10.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.6189% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0228%29 Aug
cache13–100.0719%29 Aug
cache13–100.0015%29 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0234%29 Aug
mirage15–150.0731%29 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0520%25 Aug
dust213–70.0622%25 Aug
cache12–160.0024%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0229%23 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0728%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.029%23 Aug
mirage13–70.0320%23 Aug
cache8–130.0537%23 Aug
dust27–130.0148%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0818%19 Aug
cache10–130.0223%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0623%19 Aug
dust213–90.1039%18 Aug
mirage13–100.0129%15 Aug
dust29–130.0038%15 Aug
ancient2–130.0227%15 Aug
nuke16–130.0535%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0523%15 Aug
mirage11–130.0427%15 Aug
inferno9–10.1735%15 Aug
mirage11–130.0723%14 Aug
cache3–130.0348%14 Aug
dust213–90.0933%14 Aug
inferno13–70.0033%6 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0134%6 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0632%6 Aug
cache13–70.1432%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0629%6 Aug
cache13–80.0427%5 Aug
inferno13–20.0924%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0220%5 Aug
dust213–110.0434%4 Aug
cache12–120.0617%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0124%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0320%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0231%4 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0316%3 Aug
cache13–40.1720%3 Aug
cache13–70.1136%2 Aug
dust210–130.0426%2 Aug
inferno11–130.0120%2 Aug
cache13–50.0422%30 Jul
mirage12–120.0042%30 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0117%30 Jul
dust26–130.0325%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0531%30 Jul
dust212–120.0526%29 Jul
mirage6–130.0138%29 Jul
cache7–130.0226%15 Jul
anubis13–10.0822%10 Jul
cache13–100.0532%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0317%10 Jul
dust213–40.0833%10 Jul
mirage11–130.1045%8 Jul
cache13–10.0531%8 Jul
inferno9–130.0522%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.0332%6 Jul
dust29–13-0.0235%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0021%5 Jul
dust23–130.0215%5 Jul
cache12–120.0127%5 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0131%27 Jun
dust25–13-0.0137%27 Jun
anubis9–130.0516%26 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0231%26 Jun
office5–13-0.0532%26 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0015%22 Jun
dust213–100.0323%22 Jun
inferno10–130.0922%20 Jun
inferno4–60.0543%13 Jun
cache12–120.0233%13 Jun
cache9–130.0833%13 Jun
mirage2–9-0.1118%7 Jun
ancient0–2-0.110%7 Jun
dust22–13-0.0433%7 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0330%7 Jun
cache1–13-0.0920%7 Jun
dust213–100.0622%7 Jun
ancient13–90.1031%6 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0019%6 Jun
inferno13–30.1448%6 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0319%5 Jun
mirage13–10.0424%5 Jun
dust213–70.0625%5 Jun
anubis11–130.0127%5 Jun
nuke13–70.1118%5 Jun
dust213–70.0132%5 Jun
dust211–13-0.0015%4 Jun
ancient5–130.0136%4 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0126%4 Jun
nuke13–90.0822%3 Jun
dust213–40.1232%3 Jun
overpass13–6-0.0222%3 Jun
nuke13–70.0520%3 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0432%3 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →