NoBody

NoBody — CS2 Stats

FJ76561198046705748[U:1:86440020]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,467Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20920 of 230162 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,467 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 16 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +1,009 16 May19 Sept · 11 days played
23,71424,999peak 24,99916 May19 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-05-16

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,999
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNoBodyPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning46
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51445Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time579ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 25 Jun
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 5 Jul
398msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 10 Jul
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 100% over 7dust2Weakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB189950%-0.01
dust2C1771041%0.00
mirageC1771041%0.01
ancientA1610663%0.02
cacheB126650%0.02
anubisB84450%0.00
infernoS770100%0.04
overpass31233%0.04
vertigo2020%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

859Matches
54%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
78.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10159%1.1015.6
Ancient6146%1.0816.2
Nuke4753%1.1516.6
Dust23863%1.1615.7
Inferno1782%1.0714.8
Anubis1547%1.1114.4
Cache967%1.1618.2
Overpass540%1.4620.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
582msReaction time
29.9%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
7.35HE damage / grenade
7.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.9286% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–4-0.0420%27 Aug
dust213–50.0537%27 Aug
cache7–130.0414%24 Aug
cache13–11-0.0111%23 Aug
cache1–13-0.0328%12 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0023%12 Aug
dust26–13-0.0525%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0115%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0116%8 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0110%2 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0316%24 Jul
nuke12–160.0129%24 Jul
dust210–13-0.0133%23 Jul
anubis13–40.0720%23 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0015%23 Jul
dust25–13-0.029%20 Jul
dust213–10.0427%20 Jul
mirage8–130.0226%20 Jul
mirage4–130.0121%15 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0122%15 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0311%15 Jul
cache16–14-0.0314%15 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0126%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0317%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0318%15 Jul
anubis13–90.0127%15 Jul
mirage7–13-0.029%15 Jul
mirage13–40.1114%14 Jul
dust212–12-0.0525%14 Jul
inferno9–20.0523%14 Jul
cache8–13-0.0517%14 Jul
nuke13–60.0129%14 Jul
cache12–12-0.0117%14 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0841%14 Jul
inferno13–80.0313%14 Jul
mirage12–120.0519%14 Jul
cache13–40.1311%14 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0533%14 Jul
vertigo12–120.0824%14 Jul
anubis13–60.087%13 Jul
ancient13–80.0718%12 Jul
ancient10–130.0818%12 Jul
cache11–130.0725%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.027%12 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0417%12 Jul
ancient2–130.0116%10 Jul
dust213–70.0428%10 Jul
nuke13–40.0941%10 Jul
nuke0–9-0.280%10 Jul
inferno9–60.1416%10 Jul
inferno13–90.0117%10 Jul
dust212–16-0.0315%9 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0112%9 Jul
dust213–70.0333%9 Jul
mirage13–80.0230%9 Jul
ancient13–7-0.049%9 Jul
anubis13–100.0213%7 Jul
inferno13–80.018%6 Jul
mirage10–130.0021%6 Jul
cache13–50.106%6 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0520%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0720%5 Jul
nuke13–30.0855%5 Jul
ancient13–20.1120%5 Jul
ancient13–20.0716%5 Jul
dust22–13-0.0310%5 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0422%4 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0821%4 Jul
anubis7–13-0.027%3 Jul
overpass13–30.0823%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0129%3 Jul
ancient13–110.0416%3 Jul
nuke11–130.0518%3 Jul
nuke10–130.0115%2 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0420%2 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0014%28 Jun
inferno13–80.0219%28 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0025%28 Jun
cache13–90.0734%28 Jun
overpass9–130.0416%28 Jun
nuke1–13-0.1017%27 Jun
ancient13–60.0317%25 Jun
ancient19–170.0518%25 Jun
overpass12–16-0.0125%25 Jun
dust210–130.0332%25 Jun
nuke9–50.1748%25 Jun
mirage10–130.0016%24 Jun
dust25–13-0.0211%14 Jun
dust213–100.0017%14 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0629%3 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0719%24 May
dust213–8-0.0520%22 May
dust213–90.0924%22 May
cache13–110.0022%19 May
dust28–130.0823%19 May
ancient16–140.0317%16 May
cache4–130.0216%16 May
dust22–13-0.0217%16 May
ancient16–19-0.0316%16 May
mirage11–130.0015%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →