Aiv0pesu — CS2 Stats

76561198046598828[U:1:86333100]✓ No bans

1,201Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,057Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4556 of 17528 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,472 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning39

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression3.1

Utility5.7

Positioning3.9

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning3.9

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels0.5

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time625ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 625ms

Headshot accuracy21.1%−3.1%

first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 13–5

13–1Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12nukeWeakest map · 48% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	25	12–13	48%	-0.03
cache	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.02
mirage	B	18	9–9	50%	-0.02
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.02
anubis	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.03
inferno	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03
dust2	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.03
train	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.02
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.10
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,182Matches

51%Win rate

0.91Avg K/D

68.4ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	117	56%	0.86	13.3
Mirage	116	45%	0.92	14.2
Ancient	101	49%	0.80	12.7
Anubis	66	50%	0.90	14.5
Overpass	54	50%	0.86	12.7
Train	49	61%	0.76	13.2
Inferno	32	41%	0.82	13.8
Dust2	29	31%	0.84	13.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy

32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.4%Spray accuracy

82.9%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

621msReaction time

24.8%T opening success

33.7%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

12.0%Flash assists

6.32HE damage / grenade

6.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.8175% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	19–22	-0.05	13%	14 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.06	21%	14 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.08	15%	14 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.02	14%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.08	23%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	11%	14 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	20%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	16%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	20%	8 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	26%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	27%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	11%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	19%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	17%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	18%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	31%	6 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.08	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	32%	6 Aug →
inferno	9–7	0.01	19%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	23%	6 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	27%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	27%	6 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	21%	6 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.10	26%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.03	24%	5 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.03	17%	5 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	22%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	24%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.00	29%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.11	14%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	22%	3 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	30%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.00	24%	1 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.05	37%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	16%	1 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	22%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	23%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–1	-0.06	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	24%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.11	12%	30 Jul →
inferno	9–7	0.04	24%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	18%	29 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	33%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	18%	26 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.01	7%	25 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	24%	20 Jul →
nuke	7–0	-0.00	33%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	10%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	11%	18 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	26%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.03	22%	18 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	28%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.09	19%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	27%	16 Jul →
nuke	16–14	-0.02	25%	15 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	28%	15 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	23%	15 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	20%	15 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	31%	12 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	24%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	8%	10 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	40%	10 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	17%	10 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.09	25%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	27%	10 Jul →
warden	13–5	-0.10	23%	8 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	-0.08	17%	8 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	32%	8 Jul →
train	13–8	0.02	19%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.05	41%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.07	28%	7 Jul →
train	13–4	-0.06	23%	7 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.03	25%	7 Jul →
alpine	13–9	-0.02	20%	7 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.13	28%	7 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.04	16%	7 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.08	17%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.05	20%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.06	26%	6 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.09	18%	6 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	14%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	32%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	29%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	20%	5 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.00	30%	5 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	18%	5 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	33%	4 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	32%	4 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	25%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–8	-0.04	24%	4 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.05	15%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.03	26%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	26%	3 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.04	23%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.03	29%	3 Jul →