Aivopesu

Aivopesu — CS2 Stats

FI76561198046598828[U:1:86333100]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,202Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,057Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39549 of 237644 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,472 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 23,057 → 23,057
0Faceit ELO · 1,472 → 1,472
+1Tracked matches · now 1,202
−3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,057 -101 3 Jul28 Aug · 13 days played
19,59924,284peak 24,2843 Jul28 Aug
24,284Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,472Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,472
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,227 below peak (24,284)
  • +2,942 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,943 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAivopesuFACEITLevel 6 · 1,472 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,057 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,472csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning40
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54451Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · −81ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.4
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time622ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 7 Jul
41%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · cache, 8 Jul
453msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 16 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 5 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 47% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB25121348%-0.03
cacheB1910953%-0.02
mirageB178947%-0.02
ancientB168850%-0.02
anubisA127558%-0.03
inferno220100%0.03
dust22020%-0.00
vertigo220100%-0.03
train220100%-0.02
warden110100%-0.10
alpine110100%-0.02
overpass110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,183Matches
51%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
68.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke11756%0.8613.3
Mirage11645%0.9214.2
Ancient10248%0.8012.8
Anubis6650%0.9014.5
Overpass5450%0.8612.7
Train4961%0.7613.2
Inferno3241%0.8213.8
Dust22931%0.8413.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
615msReaction time
24.3%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
6.12HE damage / grenade
6.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.2714% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0115%4 Sept
mirage19–22-0.0513%14 Aug
cache13–9-0.0621%14 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0815%14 Aug
ancient16–140.0214%14 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0823%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0311%14 Aug
cache8–13-0.0220%8 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0216%8 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0420%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0126%8 Aug
ancient13–60.0127%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0411%7 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0419%7 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0217%7 Aug
mirage13–70.0218%7 Aug
cache13–6-0.0231%6 Aug
cache2–13-0.0815%6 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0132%6 Aug
inferno9–70.0119%6 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0123%6 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0327%6 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0627%6 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0421%6 Aug
cache7–13-0.1026%5 Aug
ancient13–10.0324%5 Aug
cache13–9-0.0317%5 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0422%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0324%5 Aug
anubis13–80.0029%5 Aug
nuke13–8-0.1114%3 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0222%3 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0130%2 Aug
anubis13–20.0024%1 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0537%1 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0216%1 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0222%1 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0523%30 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0619%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0324%30 Jul
anubis13–10-0.1112%30 Jul
inferno9–70.0424%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0218%29 Jul
cache13–90.0133%29 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0533%29 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0311%29 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0318%26 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0417%25 Jul
anubis10–130.017%25 Jul
cache7–13-0.0424%20 Jul
nuke7–0-0.0033%20 Jul
nuke13–100.0124%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0510%19 Jul
dust29–13-0.0111%18 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0126%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0322%18 Jul
cache13–90.0128%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0919%16 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0127%16 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0225%15 Jul
cache8–13-0.0219%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0228%15 Jul
cache4–13-0.0123%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0520%15 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0231%12 Jul
cache6–13-0.0424%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.018%10 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0140%10 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0717%10 Jul
cache13–20.0925%10 Jul
anubis13–100.0127%10 Jul
warden13–5-0.1023%8 Jul
vertigo13–7-0.0817%8 Jul
cache6–13-0.0632%8 Jul
train13–80.0219%8 Jul
cache12–12-0.0541%8 Jul
cache13–10-0.0728%7 Jul
train13–4-0.0623%7 Jul
vertigo13–90.0325%7 Jul
alpine13–9-0.0220%7 Jul
cache13–50.1328%7 Jul
cache13–20.0416%7 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0817%6 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0520%6 Jul
nuke13–60.0626%6 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0918%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0314%6 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0132%5 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0329%5 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0120%5 Jul
dust28–130.0030%5 Jul
ancient5–130.0118%5 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0733%4 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0232%4 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0125%4 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0424%4 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0515%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0326%3 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0126%3 Jul
ancient11–130.0423%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →