Nosferatu

Nosferatu — CS2 Stats

CK76561198045025154[U:1:84759426]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

993Tracked matches56%Win rate2022Tracked since
5,767Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,562Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54314 of 219747 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 993 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 20 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,562 +1,563 5 Feb9 Sept · 16 days played
19,18222,940peak 22,9405 Feb9 Sept
22,940Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,003Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-01-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,003
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 497 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,378 below peak (22,940)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,438 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=35,202), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate56.8%47.0%49.2%above
Shot accuracy14.3%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.081.120.11 short
Match win rate33.1%46.7%48.5%15.4% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNosferatuPREMIER21,562 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,003csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning52
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52435Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLWTWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.2
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time590ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 26 Jan
52%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 22 Jun
383msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 22 Jun
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 14 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 10ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C39172244%0.01
infernoA30171357%0.03
mirageA106460%-0.00
nukeA95456%0.02
ancientC52340%0.02
anubis43175%0.02
overpass32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

275,231Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
7,968Matches
33.1%Match win rate
56.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Pink band
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
14,970MVPs
4,263Hours (in match)
5,893Bombs planted
1,455Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47113,984
AWP25,066
Tec-94,374
P2503,377
FAMAS2,630

Lifetime map wins

26,144dust2
13,101inferno
2,333nuke
1,159train
1,158cbble
492office
356vertigo
198dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,094Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
85.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2352%1.0214.6
Dust21741%1.0814.7
Inferno1567%1.0818.3
Nuke1362%0.9316.5
Overpass1164%1.3018.8
Vertigo862%0.8112.3
Anubis580%1.2112.0
Train10%0.8416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
588msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
50.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
12.02HE damage / grenade
13.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0517%28 Jun
dust213–11-0.0613%28 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0115%27 Jun
dust28–13-0.0430%27 Jun
dust28–130.0618%25 Jun
inferno13–30.0923%25 Jun
dust212–12-0.0223%25 Jun
inferno13–100.0917%24 Jun
dust212–120.0039%24 Jun
dust21–13-0.0824%23 Jun
dust24–13-0.1126%22 Jun
dust27–13-0.0452%22 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0325%22 Jun
dust26–13-0.0326%22 Jun
inferno13–80.0421%22 Jun
inferno9–130.0623%17 Jun
dust213–40.0411%17 Jun
inferno13–110.0415%17 Jun
dust213–90.0327%17 Jun
mirage13–60.0126%27 Mar
inferno13–100.0311%27 Mar
dust213–80.0516%27 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0420%24 Mar
dust213–60.0022%24 Mar
ancient13–90.0720%24 Mar
dust215–150.0216%24 Mar
dust29–130.0227%24 Mar
dust25–130.0028%24 Mar
inferno13–110.0622%24 Mar
anubis13–80.0217%24 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0315%24 Mar
inferno15–150.0915%24 Mar
dust213–5-0.0222%24 Mar
nuke13–60.0912%23 Mar
nuke11–13-0.053%23 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0026%23 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0116%23 Mar
inferno13–50.0431%20 Mar
mirage2–13-0.098%20 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0132%19 Mar
dust213–80.0214%19 Mar
dust211–130.0022%18 Mar
inferno13–50.0416%18 Mar
dust213–110.0418%17 Mar
dust213–50.0624%17 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0313%17 Mar
dust213–90.0725%17 Mar
inferno16–130.0517%17 Mar
dust213–60.0316%17 Mar
dust213–90.0118%16 Mar
mirage13–90.0115%16 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0116%16 Mar
mirage12–160.0219%16 Mar
dust213–100.0824%15 Mar
dust25–13-0.0927%15 Mar
dust210–130.0231%14 Mar
inferno13–30.0521%14 Mar
dust25–13-0.0225%14 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0320%14 Mar
nuke13–90.0531%14 Mar
ancient13–40.0523%14 Mar
inferno13–10.0727%14 Mar
dust25–13-0.0214%26 Feb
anubis13–50.0313%26 Feb
dust26–13-0.0318%25 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0122%25 Feb
inferno9–130.0220%25 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0521%25 Feb
inferno8–130.0030%25 Feb
inferno9–130.0219%25 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0227%25 Feb
dust213–80.0725%15 Feb
mirage11–30.0422%14 Feb
nuke11–130.0116%14 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0219%14 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0412%5 Feb
overpass13–2-0.027%5 Feb
inferno13–100.0919%5 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0019%5 Feb
nuke13–50.0625%4 Feb
nuke13–80.0721%4 Feb
anubis13–80.0521%4 Feb
inferno13–90.1026%26 Jan
mirage8–130.0017%26 Jan
overpass13–30.0517%26 Jan
mirage13–40.0725%26 Jan
nuke13–5-0.0229%26 Jan
dust28–130.0522%26 Jan
dust213–60.0626%26 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0018%26 Jan
ancient0–70.0114%26 Jan
inferno13–110.0317%21 Jan
inferno0–13-0.048%21 Jan
dust212–120.0120%21 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0415%21 Jan
dust213–90.0712%21 Jan
dust211–13-0.0123%21 Jan
dust213–110.0335%20 Jan
dust27–130.0319%20 Jan
inferno13–90.0517%20 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →