Timothée Chalamet Sucks

Timothée Chalamet Sucks — CS2 Stats

76561198044982795[U:1:84717067]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

922Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,877Top 25% of 205,709 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32654 of 253479 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,877 +177 12 Aug – 16 Oct · 29 days played
22,28925,536peak 25,53612 Aug16 Oct
26,281Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-08-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,659 below peak (25,536)
  • +1,407 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,123 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTimothée Chalamet SucksFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,877 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning55
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateTWWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time555ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 529ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 30 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 15 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · dust2, 25 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 20 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB189–950%-0.01
dust2B179–853%-0.00
nukeS1711–665%0.01
anubisB168–850%0.00
cacheB137–654%-0.00
infernoC125–742%-0.01
mirageC73–443%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
55%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
80.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21861%1.1416.6
Ancient1856%0.8815.1
Nuke1436%0.9116.1
Anubis1258%1.0015.8
Mirage1070%1.1919.3
Cache862%1.2417.0
Inferno838%0.9312.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
554msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
10.53HE damage / grenade
6.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1053% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis15–150.0217%16 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0329%11 Oct →
mirage16–130.0222%10 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.056%27 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0625%27 Sept →
nuke13–100.0115%25 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0633%25 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0110%25 Sept →
nuke13–70.0620%24 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0712%24 Sept →
inferno16–130.0727%24 Sept →
cache13–110.0218%23 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0236%15 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0129%13 Sept →
nuke3–8-0.0112%13 Sept →
ancient13–50.0023%12 Sept →
mirage11–130.0210%11 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0226%11 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0111%10 Sept →
dust213–90.0117%10 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0712%9 Sept →
dust213–50.089%8 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0414%7 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0421%7 Sept →
nuke11–130.018%6 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.070%5 Sept →
anubis0–5-0.060%5 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0112%5 Sept →
anubis13–160.0221%5 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0122%5 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.018%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0517%3 Sept →
ancient13–90.0111%1 Sept →
nuke22–20-0.0712%31 Aug →
ancient11–130.0232%31 Aug →
inferno1–5-0.029%31 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0111%30 Aug →
nuke13–40.1019%30 Aug →
anubis13–90.028%30 Aug →
cache13–80.0619%29 Aug →
inferno4–130.0129%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.0624%27 Aug →
dust23–130.0219%26 Aug →
cache13–90.0117%26 Aug →
mirage5–0-0.0133%26 Aug →
nuke9–130.0710%26 Aug →
anubis9–130.0617%25 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0719%24 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0813%24 Aug →
anubis13–100.0118%24 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0221%23 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0524%22 Aug →
cache1–20.0420%22 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0821%22 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0429%22 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0018%21 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0211%21 Aug →
inferno13–160.0116%21 Aug →
dust25–130.0119%21 Aug →
nuke13–80.0116%21 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.067%21 Aug →
anubis13–20.0123%20 Aug →
cache15–150.0018%20 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0322%19 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0620%18 Aug →
dust213–30.0523%18 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0015%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.036%17 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0118%17 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0119%16 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0232%16 Aug →
cache13–80.0326%16 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0721%16 Aug →
cache13–20.0215%16 Aug →
nuke13–30.0121%16 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0221%16 Aug →
mirage16–120.0518%16 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0613%15 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0117%15 Aug →
nuke9–130.0011%15 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.049%15 Aug →
nuke13–110.0231%15 Aug →
anubis16–120.0118%15 Aug →
ancient14–160.0213%14 Aug →
dust213–100.0915%14 Aug →
anubis13–100.0521%14 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0112%14 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0820%13 Aug →
anubis11–130.0125%13 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0115%13 Aug →
ancient13–70.0714%13 Aug →
anubis9–130.0516%13 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0211%13 Aug →
dust27–130.0124%13 Aug →
nuke13–40.0322%13 Aug →
anubis13–50.0118%13 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0127%13 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0830%12 Aug →
dust213–60.0227%12 Aug →
nuke13–20.0718%12 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.