Aquilon C-137

Aquilon C-137 — CS2 Stats

YE76561198044634004[U:1:84368276]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

759Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,875Purple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7890 of 17173 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAquilon C-137FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,875 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning53
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateLLLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2
Aggression6.8
Utility6.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.3
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time577ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — nuke 9–1
131Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 22infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2216673%0.04
cacheC2291341%0.02
ancientB21101148%0.01
anubisC1981142%-0.00
infernoD113827%-0.03
dust22020%0.00
overpass1010%-0.19
debris1010%-0.10
mirage1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
56%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1656%1.2718.4
Vertigo1080%1.1716.4
Ancient560%1.1414.6
Anubis367%0.9615.3
Dust220%1.0816.5
Overpass10%0.8511.0
Inferno10%1.3619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
561msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
10.31HE damage / grenade
9.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3078% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass2–9-0.1917%28 Aug
inferno8–130.018%28 Aug
ancient8–130.0317%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0124%26 Aug
nuke14–160.0521%26 Aug
anubis5–130.0423%25 Aug
cache5–130.007%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0120%25 Aug
cache3–13-0.0715%24 Aug
cache13–80.0617%24 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0113%24 Aug
cache13–160.0128%23 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0013%23 Aug
anubis7–13-0.045%23 Aug
cache13–40.1221%23 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0111%23 Aug
cache7–130.0128%23 Aug
ancient15–150.0413%23 Aug
nuke13–110.0113%22 Aug
nuke13–60.0414%22 Aug
nuke13–80.019%22 Aug
ancient13–40.0223%22 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0618%22 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0317%22 Aug
nuke9–10.2220%22 Aug
debris4–9-0.1023%22 Aug
anubis6–130.0811%20 Aug
cache13–50.0919%19 Aug
ancient13–70.0420%19 Aug
nuke7–90.0927%18 Aug
inferno7–9-0.158%18 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0619%18 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0330%18 Aug
cache9–13-0.045%18 Aug
ancient8–130.0224%17 Aug
ancient13–60.0017%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.0217%17 Aug
cache13–60.0719%16 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0716%16 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0019%16 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0413%16 Aug
cache13–10.109%16 Aug
inferno5–130.0022%16 Aug
anubis11–130.0515%15 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0311%13 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0619%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0124%12 Aug
cache8–13-0.0130%12 Aug
anubis13–100.0417%11 Aug
cache10–130.0518%11 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0210%11 Aug
cache4–13-0.039%5 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0117%4 Aug
nuke13–90.0617%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0213%4 Aug
ancient13–60.0124%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0626%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0214%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0114%3 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0836%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0213%2 Aug
ancient13–10.067%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0218%2 Aug
cache4–13-0.0111%2 Aug
cache13–10-0.039%2 Aug
anubis10–13-0.049%31 Jul
anubis13–90.0212%31 Jul
cache12–160.0217%31 Jul
ancient13–110.1210%31 Jul
nuke13–70.0525%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0312%30 Jul
ancient7–130.0120%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0412%30 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0218%27 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0328%27 Jul
ancient13–70.0423%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0118%26 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0223%26 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0122%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0221%25 Jul
cache13–100.1230%25 Jul
anubis13–50.0111%25 Jul
cache9–130.0118%25 Jul
anubis8–130.0211%23 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0027%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.1015%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0917%22 Jul
nuke13–20.1022%21 Jul
cache13–50.0115%21 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0016%21 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0221%21 Jul
nuke13–40.069%21 Jul
cache13–80.0823%20 Jul
anubis8–130.0129%20 Jul
nuke13–110.0522%20 Jul
dust214–160.0019%20 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0316%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0219%19 Jul
dust210–130.0015%19 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0317%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →