Aquilon C-137

Aquilon C-137 — CS2 Stats

YE76561198044634004[U:1:84368276]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

767Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,001Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#73520 of 226513 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,001 → 20,001
+3Tracked matches · now 767
+3.6ppWin rate · 46.4% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 21 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,001 -2,830 21 Jul14 Sept · 34 days played
19,32223,023peak 23,02321 Jul14 Sept
23,158Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-07-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,022 below peak (23,023)
  • -770 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,999 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAquilon C-137FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,001 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning50
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +74ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.0
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time582ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 22 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · nuke, 14 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 18 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 23infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2317674%0.04
cacheC2391439%0.02
ancientA2112957%0.02
anubisC1871139%-0.00
infernoD123925%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.19
debris1010%-0.10
mirage1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
56%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1656%1.2718.4
Vertigo1080%1.1716.4
Ancient560%1.1414.6
Anubis367%0.9615.3
Dust220%1.0816.5
Overpass10%0.8511.0
Inferno10%1.3619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
571msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
11.03HE damage / grenade
8.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.1571% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0117%14 Sept
nuke13–90.0436%14 Sept
ancient13–110.0624%14 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0415%13 Sept
nuke13–90.0010%7 Sept
ancient13–80.0626%7 Sept
cache13–110.019%1 Sept
cache13–160.0324%30 Aug
overpass2–9-0.1917%28 Aug
inferno8–130.018%28 Aug
ancient8–130.0317%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0124%26 Aug
nuke14–160.0521%26 Aug
anubis5–130.0423%25 Aug
cache5–130.007%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0120%25 Aug
cache3–13-0.0715%24 Aug
cache13–80.0617%24 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0113%24 Aug
cache13–160.0128%23 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0013%23 Aug
anubis7–13-0.045%23 Aug
cache13–40.1221%23 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0111%23 Aug
cache7–130.0128%23 Aug
ancient15–150.0413%23 Aug
nuke13–110.0113%22 Aug
nuke13–60.0414%22 Aug
nuke13–80.019%22 Aug
ancient13–40.0223%22 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0618%22 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0317%22 Aug
nuke9–10.2220%22 Aug
debris4–9-0.1023%22 Aug
anubis6–130.0811%20 Aug
cache13–50.0919%19 Aug
ancient13–70.0420%19 Aug
nuke7–90.0927%18 Aug
inferno7–9-0.158%18 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0619%18 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0330%18 Aug
cache9–13-0.045%18 Aug
ancient8–130.0224%17 Aug
ancient13–60.0017%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.0217%17 Aug
cache13–60.0719%16 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0716%16 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0019%16 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0413%16 Aug
cache13–10.109%16 Aug
inferno5–130.0022%16 Aug
anubis11–130.0515%15 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0311%13 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0619%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0124%12 Aug
cache8–13-0.0130%12 Aug
anubis13–100.0417%11 Aug
cache10–130.0518%11 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0210%11 Aug
cache4–13-0.039%5 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0117%4 Aug
nuke13–90.0617%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0213%4 Aug
ancient13–60.0124%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0626%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0214%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0114%3 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0836%3 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0213%2 Aug
ancient13–10.067%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0218%2 Aug
cache4–13-0.0111%2 Aug
cache13–10-0.039%2 Aug
anubis10–13-0.049%31 Jul
anubis13–90.0212%31 Jul
cache12–160.0217%31 Jul
ancient13–110.1210%31 Jul
nuke13–70.0525%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0312%30 Jul
ancient7–130.0120%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0412%30 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0218%27 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0328%27 Jul
ancient13–70.0423%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0118%26 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0223%26 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0122%26 Jul
nuke13–80.0221%25 Jul
cache13–100.1230%25 Jul
anubis13–50.0111%25 Jul
cache9–130.0118%25 Jul
anubis8–130.0211%23 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0027%22 Jul
cache3–13-0.1015%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0917%22 Jul
nuke13–20.1022%21 Jul
cache13–50.0115%21 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0016%21 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0221%21 Jul
nuke13–40.069%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →