MATTE — CS2 Stats

76561198043777739[U:1:83512011]

1,992Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,765Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1200 of 20733 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,705 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMATTEFACEITLevel 8 · 1,705 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,765 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning60
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59365Last 10059%Win rateLWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression6.4
Utility6.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — ancient 13–2
132Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25141156%0.01
dust2A22121055%0.01
ancientA159660%0.02
infernoS129375%0.01
cacheS107370%0.01
anubisB63350%0.03
nukeB63350%0.02
office21150%0.03
poseidon110100%0.06
overpass1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

677Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
82.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14449%1.0415.7
Dust28354%1.1416.0
Inferno5654%1.0416.0
Ancient5246%1.1117.4
Anubis4953%1.1115.6
Nuke4448%1.0215.9
Vertigo2646%1.0117.2
Overpass2357%1.0917.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
550msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
47.5%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
10.25HE damage / grenade
13.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2206% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–130.0315%13 Aug
anubis13–60.1110%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0632%6 Aug
dust213–50.0319%5 Aug
mirage13–40.0414%3 Aug
dust21–13-0.0826%3 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0118%3 Aug
dust213–30.0530%3 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0118%2 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0813%1 Aug
ancient7–130.0016%1 Aug
mirage13–70.1017%1 Aug
mirage4–130.0624%1 Aug
ancient13–40.0510%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0316%31 Jul
cache13–10-0.0324%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0119%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0520%30 Jul
dust213–90.0722%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0120%29 Jul
mirage13–40.0221%29 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0618%28 Jul
ancient12–120.0420%27 Jul
mirage12–120.0616%27 Jul
dust213–16-0.0116%27 Jul
nuke4–130.0117%27 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0017%27 Jul
mirage13–100.0219%27 Jul
dust210–13-0.0223%27 Jul
dust28–13-0.0612%26 Jul
nuke13–40.0715%26 Jul
dust213–11-0.0212%26 Jul
anubis5–13-0.049%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.037%25 Jul
anubis8–130.0015%24 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0113%24 Jul
ancient7–130.0310%23 Jul
dust213–70.0721%23 Jul
dust213–110.0613%23 Jul
dust212–120.0017%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0721%22 Jul
ancient13–40.0417%22 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0115%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0315%20 Jul
nuke13–60.0321%19 Jul
ancient13–100.0318%19 Jul
dust213–80.0519%19 Jul
cache13–40.0722%17 Jul
inferno22–180.0514%17 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0115%16 Jul
nuke6–130.008%16 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0825%15 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0211%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0417%14 Jul
ancient10–130.069%13 Jul
cache13–110.0325%13 Jul
cache13–11-0.0123%12 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0321%12 Jul
office13–100.0618%11 Jul
office11–130.0129%11 Jul
poseidon9–70.0611%11 Jul
mirage13–100.0313%11 Jul
cache6–130.1121%11 Jul
ancient13–20.1224%5 Jul
ancient9–6-0.0517%5 Jul
nuke16–140.0527%5 Jul
inferno7–13-0.037%5 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0419%5 Jul
dust25–130.0512%5 Jul
dust213–70.017%5 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0118%5 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0119%5 Jul
mirage13–11-0.017%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0419%4 Jul
inferno13–30.0417%4 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0012%4 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0419%4 Jul
dust213–7-0.0120%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.049%3 Jul
inferno6–13-0.057%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0310%3 Jul
mirage13–100.076%3 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0019%2 Jul
cache10–13-0.0423%30 Jun
dust213–50.0114%30 Jun
cache13–7-0.0319%29 Jun
inferno13–90.0014%28 Jun
dust213–30.1022%28 Jun
ancient15–150.018%28 Jun
mirage13–70.0318%28 Jun
anubis13–60.1012%28 Jun
dust213–30.0910%28 Jun
inferno13–70.0517%28 Jun
ancient13–110.0218%26 Jun
cache13–110.0517%25 Jun
overpass9–130.0227%25 Jun
cache13–7-0.0625%25 Jun
inferno13–90.0322%22 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0011%22 Jun
inferno13–110.0115%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →