lilKylling™

lilKylling™ — CS2 Stats

NO76561198043726950[U:1:83461222]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,051Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,598Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,598 +4,820 29 May – 4 Nov · 24 days played
13,77818,764peak 18,76429 May4 Nov
19,129Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-05-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 166 below peak (18,764)
  • +483 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,077 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,402 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlilKylling™FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER18,598 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning50
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateWLLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.0
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time590ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 10–13 · mirage, 23 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 13 Jun →
453msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 24 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC218–1338%0.00
mirageB1910–953%0.04
dust2D175–1229%-0.01
anubisA127–558%0.01
cacheA95–456%0.01
nukeA95–456%0.01
ancientD81–713%0.01
overpass—31–233%-0.03
vertigo—21–150%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

328Matches
47%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
89.6ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno633%0.9214.2
Mirage3100%1.2513.7
Vertigo250%0.9414.5
Dust2250%1.4718.5
Ancient10%0.507.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
593msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
31.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
8.65HE damage / grenade
14.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.5275% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.009%4 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.080%4 Nov →
cache9–13-0.018%3 Nov →
vertigo11–130.0211%3 Nov →
inferno8–13-0.0614%3 Nov →
dust210–130.0613%2 Nov →
anubis13–80.0116%2 Nov →
nuke13–100.0523%31 Oct →
cache13–100.0611%31 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0732%30 Oct →
mirage15–150.0911%30 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0314%25 Oct →
anubis7–50.0321%25 Oct →
dust26–130.0016%25 Oct →
cache13–90.0714%25 Oct →
mirage8–130.0623%24 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0024%24 Oct →
mirage13–90.0311%24 Oct →
mirage3–130.0116%24 Oct →
mirage7–130.0117%24 Oct →
ancient9–130.0117%23 Oct →
nuke9–130.0016%23 Oct →
anubis8–130.0316%23 Oct →
mirage10–130.1414%23 Oct →
cache13–110.0215%23 Oct →
nuke13–60.0123%23 Oct →
ancient9–130.0216%23 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0320%23 Oct →
anubis13–60.0821%21 Oct →
cache0–13-0.100%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0110%9 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0418%9 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0116%9 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0111%7 Oct →
inferno13–40.0025%7 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0810%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0228%26 Sept →
inferno13–70.0324%23 Sept →
inferno14–160.0427%22 Sept →
cache13–90.0224%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0219%4 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0514%28 Aug →
mirage16–120.0214%22 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0613%22 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0421%22 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.029%22 Aug →
anubis13–110.0516%15 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0015%15 Aug →
ancient13–90.0910%15 Aug →
dust216–130.0117%14 Aug →
inferno13–1-0.050%14 Aug →
ancient15–150.0115%14 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0516%14 Aug →
mirage13–30.0126%14 Aug →
anubis1–100.0220%14 Aug →
dust211–130.0225%14 Aug →
nuke9–130.0230%14 Aug →
mirage13–100.0619%12 Aug →
nuke13–20.0424%12 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0213%12 Aug →
inferno7–130.0119%31 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0118%31 Jul →
inferno13–110.0011%31 Jul →
mirage13–100.0619%31 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0120%31 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.0923%29 Jul →
dust216–120.0715%29 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0721%22 Jul →
mirage13–80.036%18 Jul →
inferno3–130.0120%18 Jul →
mirage3–130.1112%17 Jul →
inferno13–90.1316%15 Jul →
nuke0–13-0.050%15 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0313%15 Jul →
inferno9–130.0111%13 Jul →
cache11–130.0814%13 Jul →
nuke13–60.0521%13 Jul →
mirage2–130.0431%12 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0818%12 Jul →
dust216–130.0227%12 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0124%12 Jul →
anubis13–90.0414%12 Jul →
vertigo13–60.1315%12 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0213%11 Jul →
mirage13–30.0827%11 Jul →
inferno15–150.1215%24 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0223%20 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0220%20 Jun →
overpass9–130.0415%14 Jun →
inferno13–50.0525%14 Jun →
mirage16–140.0524%13 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0621%13 Jun →
inferno13–70.0719%13 Jun →
dust24–130.0233%13 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0215%11 Jun →
dust25–13-0.066%11 Jun →
anubis13–50.0715%11 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.085%30 May →
inferno9–13-0.095%29 May →
dust24–13-0.1012%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.