{GHA} OhItsBIGEN — CS2 Stats

GT76561198042917801[U:1:82652073]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

700Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 Developing

Premier CS Rating15,441Purple band · top ~26.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#31545 of 53815 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning41

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWWLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression2.3

Utility6.1

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.1

Utility6.1

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time574ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms

Headshot accuracy12.7%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–9

13–2Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

W2Current streak

6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 66% over 29dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	29	19–10	66%	0.00
ancient	S	17	11–6	65%	0.02
inferno	D	14	4–10	29%	-0.03
dust2	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.03
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	0.00
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
nuke	A	7	4–3	57%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

45Matches

56%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

92.2ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win

57%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	15	67%	1.10	15.1
Mirage	12	58%	1.23	16.8
Inferno	6	50%	1.18	20.7
Cache	5	60%	1.22	18.6
Anubis	4	50%	1.10	18.3
Dust2	2	0%	0.39	5.5
Nuke	1	0%	0.64	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy

34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.8%Spray accuracy

76.9%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

574msReaction time

18.9%T opening success

37.0%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

8.5%Flash assists

9.86HE damage / grenade

16.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.506% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.9492% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–10	-0.06	18%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	14%	30 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	5%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	10%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	10%	30 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.10	7%	29 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	8%	29 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	16%	29 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	10%	29 Aug →
nuke	6–6	0.02	21%	29 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	11%	29 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.06	13%	29 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	23%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	7%	29 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	19%	29 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	14%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	12%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	7%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	10%	24 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	-0.05	27%	24 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	16%	23 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	7%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.15	19%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.10	8%	23 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	9%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	18%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	12%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.00	9%	22 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.03	10%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	9%	22 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	9%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	11%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	17%	22 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	11%	17 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	20%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.11	9%	17 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	10%	17 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.04	9%	17 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	13%	17 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	12%	17 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	10%	17 Aug →
inferno	19–15	0.02	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.04	12%	16 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	10%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.05	8%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.03	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	19%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.01	13%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	10%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.11	10%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.07	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	15%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	2%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.08	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	7%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	9%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.08	16%	10 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	22%	10 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	20%	10 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.03	13%	10 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	3%	10 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	17%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.02	8%	9 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.09	13%	9 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	9%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	13%	9 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.05	11%	9 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	12%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.10	10%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.00	19%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	16%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.11	6%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	7%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	14%	8 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	13%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	21%	8 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	10%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	16%	5 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	42%	5 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	21%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.03	0%	5 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	13%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.02	18%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	25%	4 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	12%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	6%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.06	23%	3 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.02	22%	2 Aug →