parsa

parsa — CS2 Stats

76561198041389459[U:1:81123731]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,556Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,688Top 25% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24232 of 239065 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−311Premier CS Rating · 24,999 → 24,688
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 12 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,688 -1,118 12 Jul23 Sept · 23 days played
24,43426,996peak 26,99612 Jul23 Sept
27,218Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-07-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,308 below peak (26,996)
  • -312 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 312 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGparsaFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,688 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning58
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 439ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 422ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 415ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch0.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.8
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time419ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 468ms → last ⅓ avg 419ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · train, 27 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 17–19 · inferno, 13 Aug
297msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 26 Aug
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA29181162%-0.00
nukeA169756%-0.03
ancientS1611569%-0.00
cacheA148657%0.00
infernoC83538%-0.02
dust2D61517%-0.04
vertigoB63350%-0.02
mirage31233%0.00
overpass110100%-0.01
train110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
58%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
69.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4149%1.0415.4
Nuke3367%0.8412.0
Ancient3256%0.9912.6
Vertigo2143%0.9614.0
Dust22171%0.9715.2
Inferno1958%0.8814.4
Cache1741%0.9813.6
Mirage1362%0.8213.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
55.3%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
419msReaction time
47.2%T opening success
52.5%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
8.04HE damage / grenade
5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4229 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.066%23 Sept
anubis13–10.0417%22 Sept
cache13–11-0.0036%16 Sept
anubis13–70.0350%16 Sept
nuke8–130.0122%15 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0418%15 Sept
overpass13–7-0.018%14 Sept
nuke10–13-0.1129%14 Sept
inferno4–13-0.080%13 Sept
anubis13–90.0113%12 Sept
ancient8–13-0.040%10 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.050%10 Sept
inferno13–160.0027%9 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0150%9 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0245%9 Sept
anubis5–13-0.017%8 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0125%7 Sept
anubis13–160.0450%4 Sept
cache13–11-0.096%3 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0114%3 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0333%2 Sept
inferno10–130.0315%1 Sept
vertigo13–10.0320%28 Aug
train13–30.1157%27 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0610%26 Aug
cache11–13-0.007%26 Aug
nuke13–40.0160%26 Aug
inferno13–60.0333%25 Aug
dust211–13-0.0218%24 Aug
cache16–14-0.0313%24 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0210%23 Aug
cache12–16-0.0310%23 Aug
cache13–8-0.0517%21 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0420%21 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0325%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0114%20 Aug
anubis13–50.0423%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0867%19 Aug
cache13–110.0450%19 Aug
cache8–130.0431%19 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0227%19 Aug
anubis13–60.0911%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.010%19 Aug
vertigo13–16-0.020%17 Aug
anubis13–5-0.036%17 Aug
cache1–13-0.030%14 Aug
inferno17–19-0.01100%13 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0675%13 Aug
ancient13–100.0133%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0460%12 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0167%12 Aug
ancient13–40.0625%12 Aug
ancient9–130.0130%11 Aug
inferno9–13-0.100%10 Aug
anubis13–110.0218%9 Aug
anubis13–60.0342%9 Aug
cache13–30.010%9 Aug
anubis13–70.0220%9 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0410%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.04100%7 Aug
nuke13–00.030%7 Aug
mirage1–13-0.028%7 Aug
cache13–70.0725%7 Aug
ancient13–1-0.0433%6 Aug
anubis8–130.0242%5 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0625%2 Aug
inferno13–7-0.050%2 Aug
cache13–20.1017%1 Aug
anubis16–13-0.050%1 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0450%1 Aug
ancient13–50.1140%31 Jul
anubis13–60.0538%31 Jul
cache10–13-0.020%31 Jul
anubis13–40.0740%31 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0057%31 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0350%30 Jul
cache8–130.0126%26 Jul
ancient13–60.1020%25 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0222%25 Jul
anubis13–60.0211%25 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0314%25 Jul
nuke19–15-0.0618%25 Jul
anubis11–130.0129%22 Jul
ancient3–13-0.040%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.070%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0013%20 Jul
nuke1–60.0425%20 Jul
anubis5–13-0.089%16 Jul
dust26–13-0.0223%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.1013%16 Jul
anubis13–10.0220%16 Jul
mirage15–150.0340%15 Jul
nuke8–2-0.060%15 Jul
dust211–13-0.060%15 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0514%15 Jul
ancient13–110.0150%15 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0327%15 Jul
dust213–30.0333%14 Jul
anubis2–13-0.108%12 Jul
nuke13–11-0.040%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →