verrox

verrox — CS2 Stats

GB76561198041135204[U:1:80869476]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

468Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,447Top 50% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#93370 of 259189 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 468 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,447 +4,559 8 Sept – 26 Oct · 34 days played
14,88820,922peak 20,9228 Sept26 Oct
20,965Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,475 below peak (20,922)
  • +3,588 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 553 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-26
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGverroxFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,447 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning56
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD59–37–4Last 10059%Win rateWLLLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 452ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility7.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.5

Strong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.6
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time537ms−77ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−5.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 9 Sept →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 1–3 · anubis, 5 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 14 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
1–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3018–1260%0.02
dust2A2011–955%0.00
infernoA127–558%0.00
cacheS128–467%0.03
anubisB115–645%-0.01
ancientS97–278%0.01
nukeB63–350%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

748Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
—ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo250%0.306.0
Ancient1100%0.7720.0
Nuke10%0.539.0
Mirage10%0.285.0
Anubis10%0.7720.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
550msReaction time
52.2%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
11.89HE damage / grenade
15.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.3695% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–13-0.0321%21 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.084%21 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0514%20 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0129%18 Oct →
mirage0–2-0.020%18 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0222%18 Oct →
dust213–90.0233%17 Oct →
mirage11–130.0218%15 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0226%15 Oct →
cache9–130.0215%15 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0914%15 Oct →
inferno13–60.0712%14 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0122%14 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0517%13 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0117%13 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0427%12 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0439%12 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0612%12 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0122%12 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0429%12 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.008%11 Oct →
anubis13–70.0223%11 Oct →
mirage4–130.0222%10 Oct →
mirage9–130.0024%6 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.039%6 Oct →
mirage13–100.0923%6 Oct →
anubis13–90.0022%5 Oct →
ancient13–60.1126%5 Oct →
anubis1–30.0760%5 Oct →
dust216–120.0119%4 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0219%4 Oct →
ancient11–60.1230%4 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0126%4 Oct →
inferno16–120.0323%4 Oct →
mirage12–160.019%4 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0425%2 Oct →
ancient13–50.0216%2 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0519%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0123%1 Oct →
nuke0–12-0.0515%30 Sept →
inferno13–20.0224%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0324%29 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0115%29 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0532%29 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0718%29 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0116%28 Sept →
nuke13–40.1324%28 Sept →
mirage13–40.0714%28 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0516%27 Sept →
dust215–150.0123%27 Sept →
dust213–90.1224%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.0426%27 Sept →
cache13–80.0612%27 Sept →
cache13–10.0419%27 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0118%27 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0743%25 Sept →
cache13–50.1027%25 Sept →
inferno13–70.0319%25 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0033%24 Sept →
mirage13–30.0412%24 Sept →
cache0–9-0.0612%24 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0120%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.1019%23 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0231%23 Sept →
mirage7–130.0234%22 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0424%21 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0414%21 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0322%21 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0428%20 Sept →
dust213–100.0320%20 Sept →
anubis11–130.0223%20 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0020%20 Sept →
mirage13–90.0221%19 Sept →
dust213–30.0941%19 Sept →
cache13–70.0531%19 Sept →
mirage13–100.0232%18 Sept →
inferno13–100.0829%18 Sept →
inferno1–10-0.0446%18 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0415%18 Sept →
mirage13–30.0210%18 Sept →
inferno14–160.0317%18 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0042%14 Sept →
mirage13–10.1039%14 Sept →
cache13–30.0444%14 Sept →
mirage13–80.0433%14 Sept →
ancient13–20.0120%14 Sept →
cache13–60.1331%13 Sept →
anubis12–50.0344%13 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0126%13 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0424%13 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0515%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.0628%11 Sept →
dust213–70.0616%10 Sept →
mirage13–60.1527%9 Sept →
dust213–10.059%8 Sept →
mirage13–10.0237%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.1110%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0018%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.0235%8 Sept →
cache13–70.0525%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.