nahooj

nahooj — CS2 Stats

76561198040694052[U:1:80428324]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,512Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,701 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,701 → 2,701
+45Tracked matches · now 2,512
+6.9ppWin rate · 55.2% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 26 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,105 +590 30 Apr16 May · 5 days played
25,51526,223peak 26,22330 Apr16 May
Faceit ELO: 2,701 +0 30 Aug2 Sept · 2 observations
2,7012,701peak 2,70130 Aug2 Sept
26,256Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,701Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-04-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,701
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 299 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnahoojFACEITLevel 10 · 2,701 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,701csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning68
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49447Last 10049%Win rateWLWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.3
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time548ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 28.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–11 · mirage, 29 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · mirage, 5 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · office, 2 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 15 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%0.02
cacheB24131154%0.03
dust2S107370%0.03
ancientB105550%0.02
anubisD92722%0.02
overpassA85363%0.04
nukeD51420%0.02
inferno2020%0.05
office110100%0.12
boulder1010%0.06
shelter1010%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,179Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
84.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage41055%1.1918.0
Ancient20950%1.1016.7
Dust212452%1.1617.4
Overpass11161%1.2717.6
Anubis10052%1.1718.0
Inferno8751%1.2618.1
Train7251%1.2518.5
Nuke4641%1.0517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
546msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
64.6%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
5.55HE damage / grenade
6.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3099% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–30.0229%16 Sept
anubis10–130.0228%16 Sept
mirage13–100.1228%16 Sept
anubis5–130.0322%15 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0540%11 Sept
cache13–70.0416%9 Sept
mirage13–70.0818%9 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0430%4 Sept
cache13–4-0.0322%4 Sept
dust213–5-0.0626%3 Sept
office13–80.1228%2 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0126%2 Sept
ancient13–110.0627%29 Aug
mirage13–90.0325%29 Aug
mirage13–100.1029%22 Aug
nuke12–120.1232%20 Aug
cache5–13-0.0418%20 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0125%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0511%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0128%19 Aug
cache10–13-0.0222%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0334%16 Aug
cache13–00.0729%15 Aug
cache13–20.1115%14 Aug
dust213–30.0617%9 Aug
inferno14–160.0624%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0421%6 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0033%6 Aug
dust213–9-0.0119%6 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0219%6 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0026%6 Aug
dust213–60.1029%6 Aug
mirage3–130.0116%6 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0429%6 Aug
cache8–13-0.0223%6 Aug
mirage13–160.0650%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0131%4 Aug
dust213–80.0728%4 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0228%3 Aug
cache13–70.1129%3 Aug
ancient11–130.0326%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0435%30 Jul
ancient13–60.0535%30 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0214%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0217%30 Jul
ancient8–130.0135%29 Jul
mirage13–110.1836%29 Jul
cache7–13-0.0131%29 Jul
dust210–130.0219%26 Jul
boulder12–120.0632%10 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0230%10 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0022%7 Jul
anubis4–130.0227%7 Jul
cache11–130.0123%7 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0218%10 Jun
ancient16–130.0126%5 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0219%5 Jun
vertigo13–110.0440%3 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0332%28 May
overpass12–120.0923%28 May
dust213–8-0.0423%28 May
anubis13–20.0740%28 May
anubis9–10.0146%28 May
cache8–130.0135%28 May
mirage7–130.0233%26 May
overpass14–160.0519%25 May
ancient6–13-0.0528%25 May
mirage10–13-0.0146%21 May
mirage6–13-0.0228%21 May
anubis10–130.0428%18 May
nuke11–130.0444%18 May
overpass12–12-0.0233%18 May
cache13–90.0018%18 May
dust27–130.0729%18 May
dust213–90.0140%17 May
cache13–70.0330%17 May
overpass13–40.0931%17 May
mirage13–9-0.0229%16 May
ancient11–130.0319%16 May
cache9–13-0.0322%16 May
overpass13–30.1425%14 May
mirage13–10.0637%14 May
cache13–5-0.0814%14 May
ancient7–130.0129%10 May
inferno11–130.0424%10 May
ancient13–110.0322%10 May
mirage7–13-0.0319%10 May
mirage13–60.1426%10 May
cache13–40.0421%7 May
mirage2–13-0.0230%2 May
cache12–120.0922%30 Apr
dust25–130.0533%30 Apr
cache6–130.0427%30 Apr
cache13–20.1736%30 Apr
anubis7–130.0430%30 Apr
cache13–110.0530%29 Apr
cache13–60.0526%29 Apr
cache12–120.0432%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.0322%29 Apr
overpass19–160.0321%26 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →