✔

✔ — CS2 Stats

76561198040279449[U:1:80013721]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,854Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,312Top 10% of 202,706 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10484 of 250010 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,003 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,312 +4,157 23 Jul – 3 Oct · 36 days played
21,81526,739peak 26,73923 Jul3 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,003 +0 30 Aug – 13 Sept · 4 observations
2,0032,003peak 2,00330 Aug13 Sept
26,953Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,003Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,003
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 497 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 427 below peak (26,739)
  • +893 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,688 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✔FACEITLevel 9 · 2,003 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,312 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,003csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning59
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLLWWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −6.3pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility6.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.87 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 54% on T to 28% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.9
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time486ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 486ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 16–14 · ancient, 14 Jul →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 15 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 13 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3316–1748%0.02
mirageA2715–1256%0.02
ancientA159–660%0.01
infernoC146–843%0.02
cacheS65–183%-0.02
anubis—42–250%-0.01
nuke—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

941Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
80.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8849%1.1015.0
Dust25254%1.0916.1
Ancient3949%1.0015.7
Inferno3762%1.3217.7
Anubis2241%1.0015.5
Overpass560%1.3114.6
Train10%0.357.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
42.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
487msReaction time
54.2%T opening success
27.7%CT opening success
0.87Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
12.03HE damage / grenade
8.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2834% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 27.6886% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0211%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.018%2 Oct →
inferno13–110.058%25 Sept →
ancient13–60.076%23 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0312%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0314%23 Sept →
dust210–130.1217%19 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
dust213–100.0519%17 Sept →
mirage9–130.1016%16 Sept →
dust213–50.0814%15 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0317%15 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0453%15 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.035%13 Sept →
dust213–90.1314%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.055%13 Sept →
dust213–20.1319%13 Sept →
dust215–150.0120%11 Sept →
dust24–130.0123%11 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0116%11 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0012%11 Sept →
ancient13–90.036%10 Sept →
dust213–9-0.009%10 Sept →
mirage13–80.0711%9 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.027%9 Sept →
dust212–160.0117%8 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0414%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.0618%8 Sept →
inferno3–130.0416%6 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0114%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0516%6 Sept →
mirage11–130.0210%6 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0124%6 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.037%3 Sept →
dust24–12-0.0313%31 Aug →
cache13–40.048%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0412%30 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0413%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.0420%29 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0318%29 Aug →
mirage13–50.0919%28 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0213%28 Aug →
dust213–80.0929%27 Aug →
cache9–13-0.039%27 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0413%27 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0310%26 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0117%26 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0719%25 Aug →
mirage13–30.0317%25 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.018%25 Aug →
mirage13–40.0115%24 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.019%22 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0313%21 Aug →
dust216–140.0219%21 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0211%20 Aug →
mirage9–130.0113%19 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0219%19 Aug →
ancient9–130.058%17 Aug →
dust213–40.0814%17 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0321%16 Aug →
dust213–60.0320%14 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0312%12 Aug →
mirage13–80.0413%12 Aug →
mirage4–130.0525%12 Aug →
ancient9–130.0313%12 Aug →
inferno9–130.0319%10 Aug →
mirage13–110.0515%7 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0115%7 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0114%5 Aug →
mirage13–30.0221%2 Aug →
ancient13–60.0023%1 Aug →
ancient13–30.0418%1 Aug →
mirage13–70.0418%1 Aug →
dust25–130.0024%30 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0218%30 Jul →
dust213–70.0217%30 Jul →
inferno13–40.069%29 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.068%28 Jul →
dust213–70.0424%26 Jul →
inferno13–50.1017%26 Jul →
dust20–13-0.040%24 Jul →
mirage13–160.0010%24 Jul →
dust210–130.017%24 Jul →
dust213–80.0318%23 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0113%23 Jul →
inferno13–110.0314%22 Jul →
dust210–13-0.085%22 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0110%22 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0417%22 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0113%20 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0213%19 Jul →
mirage13–40.0313%18 Jul →
ancient13–100.0211%18 Jul →
anubis13–60.0321%15 Jul →
dust211–130.0717%14 Jul →
mirage13–40.0321%14 Jul →
ancient16–140.1416%14 Jul →
inferno13–160.0219%13 Jul →
dust213–50.0416%13 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0220%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.