Andreas instant

Andreas instant — CS2 Stats

DK76561198039634802[U:1:79369074]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

456Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,026Blue band · top ~33.6% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 14,026 → 14,026
0Faceit ELO · 1,039 → 1,039
+2Tracked matches · now 456
−3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,026 -2,358 1 Feb – 18 Sept · 29 days played
13,73517,643peak 17,6431 Feb18 Sept
17,643Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,039Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-01-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,039
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 12 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,617 below peak (17,643)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 974 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAndreas instantPREMIER14,026 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,039csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning38
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.6
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning3.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time623ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 10–13 · mirage, 25 Feb →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 17 Feb →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · nuke, 16 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 2 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2912–1741%-0.02
infernoA1911–858%-0.00
mirageC176–1135%-0.02
dust2A148–657%-0.02
overpassS96–367%-0.02
ancientC94–544%-0.02
anubis—20–20%-0.01
cache—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

428Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2843%0.8712.6
Inferno1553%1.0216.3
Nuke1471%0.9013.0
Dust21450%1.0416.4
Overpass1471%0.9814.6
Ancient450%0.8712.5
Anubis450%0.8312.5
Cache333%0.9111.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
621msReaction time
27.6%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.84HE damage / grenade
9.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.568% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0233%16 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0530%16 Oct →
overpass16–13-0.0416%1 May →
inferno13–90.0423%30 Apr →
cache7–13-0.0415%30 Apr →
nuke13–60.0124%30 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0320%14 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.076%6 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0327%5 Apr →
nuke16–14-0.0326%2 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0114%2 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0519%2 Apr →
nuke13–100.0026%2 Apr →
nuke6–130.0218%26 Mar →
dust214–16-0.0129%23 Mar →
inferno13–100.0223%23 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0335%23 Mar →
overpass13–8-0.0517%23 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0215%23 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0726%18 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0330%18 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.089%18 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0533%16 Mar →
inferno13–90.0516%16 Mar →
overpass13–11-0.0213%16 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.0110%16 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0613%16 Mar →
nuke13–5-0.0420%16 Mar →
anubis7–130.0115%16 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.0337%13 Mar →
mirage13–100.0415%12 Mar →
dust22–13-0.0329%12 Mar →
inferno16–14-0.0113%11 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0523%9 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0826%9 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0211%9 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0325%8 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0724%8 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0117%8 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0519%4 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0528%4 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0518%4 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0214%4 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0717%4 Mar →
dust216–140.0527%3 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0712%3 Mar →
nuke13–100.0110%3 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.0523%3 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0123%2 Mar →
dust213–1-0.0323%2 Mar →
overpass15–150.0624%1 Mar →
inferno13–50.0029%28 Feb →
inferno13–90.0012%28 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0523%28 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.029%28 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0516%27 Feb →
nuke12–16-0.0020%26 Feb →
mirage15–150.0113%26 Feb →
nuke8–130.0119%26 Feb →
mirage10–130.1322%25 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0328%25 Feb →
inferno10–130.0025%24 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.1216%24 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0426%24 Feb →
dust213–2-0.0523%24 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0425%24 Feb →
ancient10–130.0224%24 Feb →
nuke13–60.0124%23 Feb →
dust216–12-0.0714%23 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0133%23 Feb →
mirage13–1-0.0510%23 Feb →
nuke11–130.0438%23 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0214%23 Feb →
inferno13–80.0023%23 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0625%17 Feb →
overpass8–13-0.0515%17 Feb →
dust27–130.0924%17 Feb →
nuke13–80.0218%17 Feb →
nuke13–70.0543%17 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0321%16 Feb →
dust24–130.0218%13 Feb →
ancient8–13-0.0429%12 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0222%7 Feb →
ancient13–30.0521%7 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0935%2 Feb →
nuke13–90.0423%2 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0134%2 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0311%2 Feb →
nuke10–1-0.0128%2 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0233%1 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0329%1 Feb →
mirage13–2-0.0322%1 Feb →
inferno13–100.0134%1 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0312%1 Feb →
inferno4–130.0224%1 Feb →
overpass13–90.0225%31 Jan →
mirage5–130.0430%31 Jan →
inferno13–110.0430%31 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0330%31 Jan →
dust219–17-0.0228%31 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.