Chmur

Chmur — CS2 Stats

PL76561198039490380[U:1:79224652]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

731Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 13 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,738 +3,087 13 Jun8 Jun · 36 days played
12,51117,621peak 17,62113 Jun8 Jun
17,621Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2025-06-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChmurFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning45
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLLWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility3.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch6.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 652ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.5
Utility3.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time652ms+46ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 15 Apr
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 6 Mar
383msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 10 Feb
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
122In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2491538%-0.00
dust2A1610663%0.02
nukeB158753%0.01
infernoA148657%0.00
ancientA116555%0.01
anubisB105550%0.02
overpassS64267%0.01
cache110100%0.02
vertigo1010%-0.04
italy1010%0.01
train1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

313Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
82.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

54%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1741%0.8915.2
Anubis944%1.0715.0
Dust2850%1.4417.0
Nuke450%1.1919.0
Ancient333%1.0216.3
Vertigo250%0.8813.0
Overpass250%0.7715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
652msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.95HE damage / grenade
2.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4404 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2763% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0122%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0418%9 Aug
dust213–30.0432%9 Aug
nuke13–30.0327%9 Aug
ancient13–90.0213%4 Aug
inferno13–10.0718%4 Aug
inferno1–13-0.060%4 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0119%2 Aug
cache16–120.028%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0817%20 Jul
nuke13–50.0510%8 Jun
dust29–13-0.0113%8 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0714%7 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0023%27 Apr
mirage8–130.0113%26 Apr
dust213–110.1714%15 Apr
nuke10–9-0.0112%15 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0212%25 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0119%23 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0418%18 Mar
anubis13–110.1420%17 Mar
mirage13–60.0225%13 Mar
inferno13–20.0430%11 Mar
overpass13–40.067%10 Mar
dust213–11-0.049%9 Mar
nuke13–90.0119%8 Mar
overpass11–130.0318%8 Mar
dust210–130.1413%8 Mar
mirage13–50.0916%7 Mar
dust213–40.1033%6 Mar
overpass13–110.0116%6 Mar
mirage13–20.0215%5 Mar
inferno13–100.0813%5 Mar
inferno6–00.1429%5 Mar
nuke6–130.0411%4 Mar
mirage13–00.0111%4 Mar
dust216–13-0.0318%4 Mar
dust213–110.0111%3 Mar
ancient7–130.0115%3 Mar
mirage13–40.0713%2 Mar
anubis13–60.0418%2 Mar
mirage1–7-0.050%1 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0319%1 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0614%1 Mar
nuke13–80.0116%27 Feb
ancient13–00.0833%27 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0419%26 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0615%26 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0412%25 Feb
mirage10–130.0222%24 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0221%24 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0112%24 Feb
ancient7–10.0320%24 Feb
mirage15–150.0213%23 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0114%23 Feb
nuke11–130.0215%22 Feb
dust29–13-0.0214%22 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0825%19 Feb
ancient13–50.0523%18 Feb
nuke3–13-0.048%10 Feb
dust21–13-0.0922%10 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0020%10 Feb
dust213–110.0518%8 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0420%5 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0818%5 Feb
mirage8–130.0416%4 Feb
mirage13–60.0019%3 Feb
anubis13–40.0819%30 Jan
dust213–160.0317%30 Jan
inferno13–60.0410%30 Jan
nuke13–5-0.0215%30 Jan
ancient5–110.1011%29 Jan
overpass2–13-0.0815%29 Jan
mirage9–130.0214%29 Jan
dust23–130.029%29 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0512%28 Jan
vertigo8–13-0.0428%28 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0231%27 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0423%27 Jan
nuke9–130.0230%27 Jan
overpass9–10.0414%27 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0524%25 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0028%25 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0017%25 Jan
nuke10–130.0112%25 Jan
dust213–8-0.038%25 Jan
dust213–40.0514%11 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0317%11 Jul
anubis10–130.049%22 Jun
ancient13–90.0218%16 Jun
nuke13–40.000%16 Jun
mirage10–13-0.094%16 Jun
italy10–130.0114%13 Jun
train9–130.0310%13 Jun
dust216–13-0.0217%13 Jun
inferno0–13-0.020%13 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0211%13 Jun
nuke13–50.0915%13 Jun
mirage13–60.0723%13 Jun
mirage7–130.0314%13 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →