Zombanator

Zombanator — CS2 Stats

IE76561198037434162[U:1:77168434]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,908Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,800Top 25% of 208,731 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#44933 of 255842 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,215 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,800 -1,352 2 Jul – 19 Oct · 30 days played
18,35724,152peak 24,1522 Jul19 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,215 +0 31 Aug – 3 Oct · 6 observations
2,2152,215peak 2,21531 Aug3 Oct
24,152Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,215Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,215
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 285 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,352 below peak (24,152)
  • -156 over 30 days · steady
  • +4,322 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,200 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZombanatorFACEITLevel 10 · 2,215 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,800 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,215csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning71
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–40Last 10060%Win rateWLWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.07), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility4.5
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning7.1
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels7.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time568ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy28.0%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 26 Aug →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 4 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–4 · inferno, 20 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2316–770%0.03
infernoA1811–761%-0.01
dust2S1712–571%0.01
cacheA1610–663%0.02
nukeS118–373%0.01
ancientD71–614%-0.02
anubisD50–50%-0.02
vertigo—22–0100%0.00
eldorado—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,795Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14948%1.0015.2
Dust28342%0.9414.9
Ancient6459%1.1017.8
Inferno5349%0.9115.3
Anubis3554%0.8914.7
Vertigo2335%0.9313.9
Nuke2361%1.2515.0
Train1656%1.0312.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
579msReaction time
64.0%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
7.70HE damage / grenade
7.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4459 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–8-0.0133%19 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0241%19 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0126%19 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0121%19 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0527%9 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0630%9 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0019%8 Oct →
nuke13–20.0414%8 Oct →
dust24–130.0014%8 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0328%7 Oct →
dust216–130.1426%7 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0341%7 Oct →
cache6–130.0826%6 Oct →
dust26–130.1125%6 Oct →
dust213–90.0532%6 Oct →
cache4–130.0619%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.0933%5 Oct →
mirage13–70.0731%5 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0431%4 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0119%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0236%20 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0122%20 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0635%20 Sept →
inferno13–80.0059%19 Sept →
mirage13–160.0429%19 Sept →
mirage13–30.0434%19 Sept →
ancient13–100.0131%18 Sept →
inferno13–50.0829%7 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0324%7 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0418%6 Sept →
inferno5–20.0038%6 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0713%6 Sept →
mirage13–110.0520%2 Sept →
ancient6–130.0011%2 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0025%30 Aug →
vertigo9–7-0.0917%30 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0418%28 Aug →
inferno13–70.0217%28 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0127%28 Aug →
eldorado3–9-0.1213%27 Aug →
mirage13–70.1528%26 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0810%26 Aug →
cache16–130.0620%26 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0124%26 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0534%26 Aug →
mirage13–80.0530%25 Aug →
nuke13–50.0841%25 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0217%25 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0529%25 Aug →
inferno13–40.0135%7 Aug →
cache13–40.0735%7 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0130%5 Aug →
mirage13–80.0829%4 Aug →
ancient8–130.0321%4 Aug →
inferno13–80.0724%4 Aug →
dust213–110.0429%4 Aug →
mirage13–60.1275%4 Aug →
dust213–90.0433%2 Aug →
nuke13–100.0739%2 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.088%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0410%31 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0141%31 Jul →
mirage13–70.0031%29 Jul →
mirage7–130.0033%28 Jul →
dust213–9-0.064%27 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0027%27 Jul →
dust213–20.0124%27 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0413%26 Jul →
inferno13–50.0439%26 Jul →
cache13–100.0026%23 Jul →
inferno13–110.0123%22 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0327%20 Jul →
inferno4–4-0.0550%20 Jul →
cache13–110.0119%19 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0614%19 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0117%19 Jul →
dust213–60.0441%19 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0220%19 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0316%18 Jul →
cache13–110.0533%18 Jul →
mirage7–130.0329%13 Jul →
mirage13–60.0331%13 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0922%13 Jul →
nuke8–20.0135%13 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0322%13 Jul →
inferno13–70.0332%12 Jul →
mirage13–30.0923%12 Jul →
mirage13–60.1035%11 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.0026%11 Jul →
cache13–80.0924%11 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0630%10 Jul →
cache11–130.0526%9 Jul →
anubis8–130.0123%9 Jul →
dust213–90.0023%8 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0315%8 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0116%8 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0715%7 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0427%7 Jul →
vertigo13–40.0916%7 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0512%2 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.