Jame

Jame — CS2 Stats

PRO剣聖PARIVISIONRussiaIGLSettings & gear profile →

RU76561198036125584[U:1:75859856]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,085Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,085 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 22 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

44Days played since 2026-02-22

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJameFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim99
Positioning67
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4456Last 10044%Win rateLLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +13.1pp headshot accuracy · −92ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 46%
  • Avg reaction 341ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 37%
  • Avg reaction 364ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 410ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.9
Utility7.3
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 68% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 68% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.9
Positioning6.7
Utility7.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time405ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 457ms → last ⅓ avg 405ms
Headshot accuracy27.8%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 14 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 9 Sept
273msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 4 Jul
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 10 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1313In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30161453%0.04
mirageC2291341%0.01
ancientA1811761%0.01
infernoD1841422%0.01
anubisB63350%0.02
cache3030%0.00
overpass31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,708Matches
65%Win rate
1.59Avg K/D
81.0ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
59Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23263%1.5718.5
Ancient14261%1.5917.0
Dust213068%1.7718.1
Anubis9861%1.7317.7
Inferno4068%1.7217.4
Overpass3382%1.7518.1
Vertigo2646%1.4218.4
Train1650%1.3318.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$12,898Inventory value85ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
AWP | Dragon Lore (Minimal Wear)$1,755★ Karambit | Crimson Web (Minimal Wear)$1,632★ Specialist Gloves | Crimson Kimono (Well-Worn)$1,241★ Karambit | Black Laminate (Minimal Wear)$1,229★ Butterfly Knife | Crimson Web (Field-Tested)$1,024★ Butterfly Knife | Night (Field-Tested)$795

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.8%Headshot accuracy
46.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.7%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
6.4°Preaim
405msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
68.1%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
7.69HE damage / grenade
19.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4758% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–130.0339%10 Sept
inferno14–160.0130%10 Sept
inferno11–130.02100%9 Sept
inferno13–110.0928%8 Sept
ancient13–40.0331%8 Sept
dust24–13-0.0014%16 Aug
inferno10–130.0243%16 Aug
dust213–50.1038%14 Aug
anubis13–50.1426%14 Aug
cache11–130.0223%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0026%12 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0412%12 Jul
dust24–13-0.0545%12 Jul
cache9–130.0031%11 Jul
ancient19–170.0726%11 Jul
dust219–170.050%11 Jul
ancient13–90.0135%10 Jul
mirage13–50.0430%10 Jul
cache15–19-0.0229%10 Jul
anubis13–160.017%4 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0029%4 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0217%4 Jul
dust213–30.0820%3 Jul
mirage5–13-0.014%2 Jul
ancient13–40.0017%1 Jul
inferno12–14-0.0036%13 Jun
inferno0–2-0.0517%13 Jun
dust20–2-0.0450%13 Jun
dust213–140.0525%13 Jun
ancient9–130.0025%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0119%12 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0311%12 Jun
overpass1–13-0.0938%11 Jun
dust213–80.0429%11 Jun
inferno9–130.0235%11 Jun
mirage11–130.0833%22 May
dust24–130.0740%22 May
ancient13–90.049%21 May
dust213–100.0554%21 May
ancient4–130.0321%20 May
mirage6–13-0.0610%20 May
dust213–90.0913%20 May
ancient12–160.0031%12 May
dust213–110.0132%12 May
mirage5–13-0.0513%12 May
dust214–16-0.0037%11 May
anubis7–13-0.0338%11 May
ancient13–20.0646%10 May
mirage13–50.0840%10 May
ancient8–13-0.0233%9 May
inferno6–130.0123%9 May
overpass19–160.0430%23 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0730%23 Apr
dust213–110.0935%23 Apr
mirage13–110.0233%22 Apr
ancient7–130.0126%22 Apr
anubis13–100.0529%22 Apr
mirage8–130.0225%9 Apr
dust213–60.0133%9 Apr
ancient9–130.0117%9 Apr
mirage28–260.0315%8 Apr
dust213–110.0718%8 Apr
inferno9–130.0112%7 Apr
dust29–13-0.0212%7 Apr
dust211–130.0720%6 Apr
mirage6–130.0823%6 Apr
inferno16–140.027%5 Apr
dust213–9-0.0027%5 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0717%4 Apr
dust213–40.1330%4 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0130%4 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0032%28 Mar
inferno13–80.0630%28 Mar
dust211–130.0320%28 Mar
mirage13–110.0722%27 Mar
ancient13–10-0.058%27 Mar
inferno12–160.0135%23 Mar
mirage9–130.0332%23 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0036%21 Mar
anubis13–30.0413%21 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0329%19 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0013%19 Mar
dust213–80.0375%19 Mar
dust29–130.0421%17 Mar
mirage10–130.0023%16 Mar
ancient13–90.0010%16 Mar
dust26–130.0836%5 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0531%5 Mar
mirage10–130.010%4 Mar
dust219–150.0633%4 Mar
inferno7–13-0.019%4 Mar
inferno11–130.0819%3 Mar
dust210–13-0.0250%3 Mar
dust216–190.0226%2 Mar
dust213–110.0230%2 Mar
mirage19–150.0421%2 Mar
mirage13–50.0421%1 Mar
dust213–110.090%1 Mar
dust24–130.025%22 Feb
overpass10–130.0113%22 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →