Sleepy

Sleepy — CS2 Stats

76561198033736693[U:1:73470965]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,866Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,409Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,437Top 25% of 188,431 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26144 of 234974 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,956 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,866 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 16 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,437 -1,284 24 Jul18 Sept · 9 days played
24,43725,721peak 25,72124 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,956 +0 31 Aug18 Sept · 2 observations
1,9561,956peak 1,95631 Aug18 Sept
25,939Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,956Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-05-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,956
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 45 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,284 below peak (25,721)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 563 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate42.4%48.3%51.0%8.5% short
Shot accuracy13.4%13.2%13.7%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.071.090.17 short
Match win rate45.7%46.9%48.4%2.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSleepyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,956 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,437 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,956csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning62
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +88ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility6.6
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.2
Utility6.6
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time525ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 26 Aug
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 1 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 3 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA25141156%-0.00
ancientC2191243%-0.00
cacheC1881044%-0.02
nukeB147750%-0.00
mirageS118373%-0.01
dust2D93633%-0.00
anubis21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

133,595Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
7,085Matches
45.7%Match win rate
42.4%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
15,746MVPs
3,650Hours (in match)
8,211Bombs planted
1,804Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,083
AWP21,472
SSG 083,298
P2503,153
Tec-92,488

Lifetime map wins

19,342inferno
9,173nuke
7,493dust2
2,088train
1,270cbble
752vertigo
438office
84aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,327Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
78.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno11860%1.0515.3
Nuke10950%1.0515.6
Ancient10250%1.0815.3
Mirage6548%0.9915.2
Dust24935%0.9215.2
Anubis4452%1.0415.2
Train1782%1.1317.8
Cache1735%0.7812.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
71.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
525msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
9.28HE damage / grenade
13.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5823% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0315%18 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0119%18 Sept
ancient13–160.0217%18 Sept
inferno13–80.0331%15 Sept
cache6–13-0.0418%13 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0623%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0415%12 Sept
inferno13–50.0617%12 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0521%10 Sept
inferno13–50.0612%10 Sept
ancient14–160.0623%9 Sept
inferno19–150.0022%9 Sept
cache13–10-0.0329%9 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0717%8 Sept
inferno13–9-0.049%8 Sept
ancient16–140.0422%8 Sept
dust29–130.0234%8 Sept
dust213–80.0720%6 Sept
dust22–13-0.0628%5 Sept
dust213–6-0.0225%4 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0213%4 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0321%3 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0614%3 Sept
inferno11–130.0138%3 Sept
mirage13–30.0226%3 Sept
nuke13–110.1120%3 Sept
inferno13–40.0317%3 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0232%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0423%26 Aug
nuke13–60.1217%26 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0220%26 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0229%23 Aug
dust210–130.0228%23 Aug
inferno13–60.0629%23 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1022%23 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0021%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0722%23 Aug
cache13–60.0319%23 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0315%21 Aug
mirage13–30.0331%21 Aug
nuke13–90.0212%20 Aug
cache6–13-0.0021%19 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0523%19 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0613%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0125%19 Aug
ancient10–130.0314%19 Aug
cache13–30.0418%19 Aug
dust212–16-0.0228%16 Aug
ancient13–50.0213%16 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0219%14 Aug
ancient19–220.0117%14 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0529%14 Aug
inferno13–10.0725%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0226%14 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0317%12 Aug
ancient8–130.0029%12 Aug
cache13–9-0.0224%12 Aug
ancient13–90.0229%11 Aug
inferno11–130.0226%11 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0630%11 Aug
cache1–5-0.090%11 Aug
dust213–8-0.0231%11 Aug
ancient13–90.0120%7 Aug
cache13–10-0.0436%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0028%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0531%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0518%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0126%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0116%6 Aug
cache8–13-0.0516%6 Aug
cache4–13-0.0626%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0224%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0535%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0828%29 Jul
anubis4–130.0214%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0225%29 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0823%26 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0526%26 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0713%26 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0432%24 Jul
mirage15–150.0121%24 Jul
inferno13–60.0026%24 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0814%24 Jul
inferno11–130.0126%21 Jul
ancient13–50.0518%21 Jul
cache13–6-0.0617%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0024%21 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0626%21 Jul
inferno15–150.0228%21 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0523%12 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0222%12 Jul
cache13–110.0636%12 Jul
cache16–12-0.0320%9 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0123%9 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0330%9 Jul
dust28–130.0127%8 Jul
cache5–130.0127%22 Jun
nuke13–100.0347%1 Jun
nuke2–130.0530%16 May
ancient13–100.0930%16 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →