Cabotere

Cabotere — CS2 Stats

BE76561198032667930[U:1:72402202]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,029Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating9,250Light Blue band · top ~58.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+154Premier CS Rating · 9,096 → 9,250

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,250 +142 17 Aug – 4 Oct · 32 days played
5,55510,522peak 10,52217 Aug4 Oct
10,522Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,272 below peak (10,522)
  • +2,882 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 750 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCabotereFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER9,250 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning36
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateWWWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim3.7
Utility6.7
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning3.6
Utility6.7
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.06−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.06
Reaction time638ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.05Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 9 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 9 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · shelter, 26 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17dust2Weakest map · 30% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D309–2130%-0.05
anubisC188–1044%-0.04
nukeS1712–571%-0.05
infernoD155–1033%-0.03
cacheB147–750%-0.05
ancient—32–167%-0.06
mirage—20–20%-0.05
shelter—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

209Matches
44%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
66.8ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5056%0.8011.4
Dust24949%0.6710.8
Mirage3333%0.7612.7
Vertigo2326%0.6511.6
Ancient1533%0.7212.3
Inferno1567%0.7513.6
Nuke1338%0.6610.3
Train520%0.559.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
27.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.1%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
641msReaction time
43.1%T opening success
30.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
11.84HE damage / grenade
10.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4887 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.2486% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–12-0.087%4 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0019%3 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0110%30 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0326%30 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.095%29 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0413%29 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0016%28 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0419%28 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.1222%25 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0211%21 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0424%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0231%17 Sept →
anubis16–130.0022%17 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.1010%16 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0918%16 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0625%16 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.045%16 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0313%16 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0620%16 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0323%16 Sept →
dust213–10-0.1025%15 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0921%14 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0621%14 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0511%14 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0923%14 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0711%14 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0412%13 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0715%13 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0921%11 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.106%11 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.064%10 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0520%10 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0312%10 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0516%9 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0625%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0422%9 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0532%9 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0417%9 Sept →
nuke13–60.0519%9 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0225%8 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0816%8 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0522%7 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.047%7 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.1017%7 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0413%7 Sept →
dust213–70.0121%7 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0614%6 Sept →
anubis13–50.0313%6 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0313%6 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0814%5 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0717%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0212%5 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0729%5 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0521%5 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1111%5 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0230%4 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0415%4 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1013%4 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0317%4 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0315%3 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0617%3 Sept →
inferno6–130.0119%3 Sept →
dust29–130.0514%2 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0817%2 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0711%2 Sept →
cache0–4-0.060%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0711%1 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0515%1 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0821%1 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0313%1 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.098%1 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0721%1 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0122%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.078%29 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0123%29 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0615%29 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0122%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0516%29 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0617%28 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0415%28 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0618%28 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0215%28 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0621%27 Aug →
dust26–13-0.068%27 Aug →
anubis15–19-0.0926%27 Aug →
shelter1–13-0.0518%26 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0918%24 Aug →
cache13–40.0013%23 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0718%23 Aug →
inferno11–130.0213%23 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0412%22 Aug →
cache13–8-0.1018%21 Aug →
inferno13–70.0318%20 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.039%19 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0216%19 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.018%19 Aug →
cache9–13-0.028%19 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.076%17 Aug →
inferno15–150.0120%17 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0527%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.