nutterbutternate — CS2 Stats

76561198032656397[U:1:72390669]

1,257Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,029Purple band · top ~20.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19460 of 35852 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 847 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnutterbutternateFACEITLevel 3 · 847 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER17,029 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning57
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53416Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLTWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression6.4
Utility5.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time584ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 9–1
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B32151747%-0.01
nukeB168850%-0.01
mirageS128467%-0.02
infernoA116555%-0.02
cacheS96367%-0.01
anubisC73443%0.01
ancientC73443%-0.01
vertigoA53260%0.02
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
17%Win rate
0.40Avg K/D
55.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno30%0.487.7
Mirage10%0.202.0
Vertigo1100%0.386.0
Ancient10%0.388.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
578msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
4.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2879% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0414%30 Aug
mirage13–30.0719%30 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0523%28 Aug
dust26–130.0116%28 Aug
dust24–13-0.0322%28 Aug
dust212–120.0230%27 Aug
inferno9–5-0.099%27 Aug
inferno8–8-0.1216%27 Aug
dust213–10-0.0311%26 Aug
cache13–70.0324%26 Aug
cache13–110.0416%26 Aug
inferno11–13-0.104%25 Aug
mirage13–50.0117%24 Aug
anubis8–130.0117%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0218%12 Aug
dust23–13-0.045%12 Aug
nuke13–60.0014%11 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0114%11 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0315%11 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0324%11 Aug
dust213–10-0.035%11 Aug
cache13–8-0.0219%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0117%9 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0421%6 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0313%6 Aug
dust213–10-0.0113%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0219%5 Aug
nuke13–20.0618%5 Aug
ancient11–130.0412%5 Aug
dust213–8-0.0516%5 Aug
nuke11–130.004%5 Aug
dust213–90.0225%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0812%4 Aug
ancient13–110.026%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0124%3 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0320%3 Aug
vertigo13–30.0718%3 Aug
anubis11–130.0323%3 Aug
mirage6–0-0.040%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0212%3 Aug
vertigo7–130.049%3 Aug
dust210–13-0.0310%3 Aug
dust214–160.0423%2 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0412%2 Aug
dust215–15-0.0418%2 Aug
dust213–40.0322%2 Aug
inferno5–9-0.118%28 Jul
inferno9–10.1813%26 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0124%23 Jul
nuke9–130.0112%23 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0911%23 Jul
dust215–15-0.0116%23 Jul
dust29–130.0619%23 Jul
nuke13–80.0316%23 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0215%22 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0121%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0515%22 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0613%22 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0015%22 Jul
nuke13–60.0127%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.049%21 Jul
cache13–100.0311%21 Jul
inferno13–6-0.008%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0423%20 Jul
anubis6–130.0214%20 Jul
dust213–50.0425%20 Jul
dust213–110.0122%19 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0216%19 Jul
cache13–9-0.0613%19 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0313%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0414%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0124%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.036%17 Jul
dust213–100.0819%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.0433%17 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0011%16 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0611%16 Jul
dust213–10-0.0221%15 Jul
dust23–13-0.0316%15 Jul
nuke13–5-0.059%15 Jul
inferno13–60.0322%15 Jul
dust213–9-0.045%15 Jul
anubis13–40.0624%14 Jul
vertigo13–40.0414%14 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0111%13 Jul
dust213–30.0717%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.047%13 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.0228%13 Jul
overpass13–6-0.028%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.0513%13 Jul
dust24–13-0.0311%13 Jul
cache6–13-0.0420%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0413%12 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0210%12 Jul
anubis13–110.0211%12 Jul
dust23–130.028%12 Jul
cache8–130.0332%12 Jul
nuke13–60.0022%12 Jul
inferno13–40.0118%9 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0513%9 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →