jeksu2

jeksu2 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198032380149[U:1:72114421]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

70Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjeksu2FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning51
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY23345Last 6237%Win rateWWLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 694ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Newest first, from the last 62 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim3.7
Utility2.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 695ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning5.1
Utility2.2
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time684ms+75ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 684ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+5.7%
first ⅓ avg 10.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 62 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 16–5 · vertigo, 20 Jan
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · vertigo, 30 Oct
484msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · cache, 14 Aug
16–5Biggest win · vertigo, 20 Jan

Across the last 62 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
29Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 9ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoB168850%-0.01
mirageB105550%-0.01
infernoA95456%-0.02
ancientD82625%0.00
nukeD72529%0.01
dust241325%-0.04
anubis2020%0.00
overpass2020%-0.03
boulder1010%-0.07
cache1010%-0.04
palacio1010%-0.08
iris1010%-0.05

Across the last 62 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
695msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
9.16HE damage / grenade
2.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3744 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3909% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0416%11 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0316%11 Sept
anubis7–130.0716%11 Sept
boulder10–13-0.075%22 Aug
cache8–13-0.0411%14 Aug
dust22–13-0.1415%16 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0318%16 Apr
nuke13–110.0213%16 Apr
nuke13–110.0715%5 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0019%5 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0511%1 Nov
vertigo9–130.0433%30 Oct
dust213–6-0.0122%12 Oct
mirage13–10-0.0216%12 Oct
palacio4–13-0.087%9 Oct
ancient5–130.0518%1 Oct
dust28–130.0122%1 Oct
ancient7–130.0518%20 Sept
nuke10–130.0424%20 Sept
mirage13–110.0413%9 Sept
ancient13–110.0211%3 Sept
overpass9–130.0121%20 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0313%20 Aug
mirage9–130.0115%20 Aug
ancient12–120.009%20 Aug
ancient10–130.0512%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0727%15 Jun
nuke14–160.0114%16 May
nuke11–130.0314%3 May
mirage12–120.018%3 May
anubis11–13-0.0719%21 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0521%11 Nov
dust27–13-0.0232%11 Nov
nuke15–15-0.0310%9 Nov
mirage14–160.0218%9 Nov
ancient15–15-0.0616%8 Nov
mirage13–40.0112%8 Nov
vertigo7–16-0.0413%7 Dec
vertigo5–16-0.049%6 Oct
vertigo10–16-0.1014%22 Sept
nuke6–16-0.088%22 Sept
ancient16–90.018%21 Sept
mirage16–11-0.0317%29 Aug
ancient3–16-0.0818%29 Aug
inferno7–16-0.086%19 Aug
inferno16–9-0.0113%7 Jul
vertigo15–15-0.025%17 Apr
iris3–16-0.057%2 Mar
vertigo14–16-0.0411%29 Jan
vertigo16–90.022%21 Jan
vertigo16–14-0.078%21 Jan
vertigo6–16-0.0415%20 Jan
vertigo16–50.088%20 Jan
vertigo16–140.0412%6 Jan
vertigo8–16-0.0212%8 Dec
vertigo16–120.0214%8 Dec
vertigo16–12-0.0311%3 Dec
vertigo16–90.008%30 Nov
vertigo16–14-0.0421%20 Nov
overpass8–16-0.074%16 Oct
inferno16–140.039%15 Oct
inferno16–10-0.0410%15 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →