paiN

paiN — CS2 Stats

CA76561198030785573[U:1:70519845]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,379Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,538Purple band · top ~14.3% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,538 -3,946 29 Aug – 16 Oct · 25 days played
17,16922,484peak 22,48429 Aug16 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,393 +0 29 Aug – 14 Sept · 2 observations
1,3931,393peak 1,39329 Aug14 Sept
22,484Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,393Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,393
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,946 below peak (22,484)
  • -3,162 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,462 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpaiNPREMIER18,538 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,393csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning58
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLWWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −6.2pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility6.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.8
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time612ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–6 · overpass, 10 Sept →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · dust2, 15 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 5 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1811–761%-0.03
infernoD164–1225%-0.03
cacheC146–843%-0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.02
nukeC114–736%-0.04
mirageB115–645%-0.01
ancientB115–645%-0.03
train—31–233%0.03
office—11–0100%0.03
vertigo—10–10%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,405Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
82.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8845%0.9615.4
Dust27948%0.8914.3
Inferno4050%0.9916.3
Ancient4058%0.9515.0
Nuke3754%0.9016.1
Anubis2948%0.8412.3
Overpass1338%0.9212.8
Vertigo1050%0.9415.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
600msReaction time
53.8%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
11.22HE damage / grenade
5.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–9-0.2310%16 Oct →
office13–90.0318%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.0116%16 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0326%16 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0216%16 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0211%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.037%16 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0216%16 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.043%16 Oct →
cache13–80.0518%16 Oct →
ancient4–130.0215%16 Oct →
mirage13–70.0318%16 Oct →
train12–120.1129%15 Oct →
nuke13–50.0316%15 Oct →
dust23–00.0133%15 Oct →
anubis11–130.0415%14 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0514%13 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0415%13 Oct →
nuke16–120.0117%13 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0230%13 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.028%13 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0113%13 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0010%13 Oct →
cache13–60.0021%12 Oct →
mirage6–130.0521%12 Oct →
nuke10–130.0113%12 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0616%12 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.028%12 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.058%12 Oct →
nuke13–110.0215%12 Oct →
inferno11–130.0124%11 Oct →
cache5–13-0.058%11 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.049%11 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0211%11 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0611%11 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0811%11 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0726%11 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0410%11 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.045%11 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0019%10 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0210%10 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0722%10 Oct →
inferno13–50.0222%10 Oct →
cache13–40.0314%10 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0120%10 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0619%10 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0214%9 Oct →
cache11–130.008%9 Oct →
train13–9-0.0629%8 Oct →
train11–130.0313%7 Oct →
anubis13–80.0110%7 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.086%5 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0818%5 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0213%5 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0520%5 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0317%4 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.046%4 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0123%3 Oct →
dust213–8-0.054%2 Oct →
cache16–120.0111%2 Oct →
dust216–130.0013%2 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0133%28 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0411%27 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0513%27 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.063%27 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0824%27 Sept →
mirage8–130.0823%21 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0315%21 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0313%21 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0213%20 Sept →
inferno8–20.0220%20 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0518%20 Sept →
dust213–90.0122%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0813%19 Sept →
dust24–13-0.109%19 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.037%19 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0724%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0214%18 Sept →
mirage13–00.0119%18 Sept →
inferno10–130.0120%18 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0824%18 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0714%18 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0412%18 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.015%18 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0114%18 Sept →
anubis10–130.0121%17 Sept →
dust213–80.0010%15 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0323%14 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0814%14 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0516%14 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.076%13 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0019%13 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0922%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0413%13 Sept →
mirage13–90.0216%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0117%13 Sept →
cache13–110.0411%11 Sept →
anubis13–100.007%11 Sept →
overpass13–60.1623%10 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0316%10 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.