Sauce Castillo — CS2 Stats

76561198030526152[U:1:70260424]Steam profile ↗

2,107Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.8 Developing

Premier CS Rating23,210Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4757 of 19233 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48

Positioning41

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8

Aggression4.1

Utility5.6

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.6

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8

Positioning4.1

Utility5.6

Mechanics3.7

Opening Duels0.6

Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time603ms+25ms

first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms

Headshot accuracy14.4%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.05Best rating — nuke 13–6

13–1Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 20dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	26	13–13	50%	-0.01
inferno	A	25	14–11	56%	-0.01
nuke	S	20	15–5	75%	-0.01
dust2	D	14	4–10	29%	-0.02
cache	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.04
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.03
mirage	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

731Matches

50%Win rate

0.77Avg K/D

66.5ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	45	51%	0.92	13.0
Nuke	44	73%	0.96	14.0
Ancient	39	49%	0.79	12.6
Mirage	28	54%	0.80	11.4
Anubis	28	61%	0.74	11.9
Dust2	23	30%	0.80	13.2
Overpass	18	67%	0.87	14.4
Cache	6	50%	0.77	11.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy

33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

66.4%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

600msReaction time

33.5%T opening success

31.0%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

13.5%Flash assists

5.48HE damage / grenade

9.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.7422% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.5358% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–5	-0.03	6%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	25%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.00	6%	24 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	11%	24 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	30%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.02	12%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.04	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.04	10%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	26%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	13%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.06	26%	18 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	14%	18 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	18%	17 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.00	11%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	16%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	12%	16 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	20%	13 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.09	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	10%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	11%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	17%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.10	5%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.02	9%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.12	8%	11 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.04	15%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	10%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	16%	11 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	2%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	16%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	18%	10 Aug →
cache	3–3	-0.11	0%	10 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	23%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	6%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	5%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	18%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.01	19%	4 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	21%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.00	26%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.00	19%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	23%	1 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.08	20%	1 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	26%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	9%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–1	-0.03	21%	1 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.07	21%	29 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.02	14%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	24%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	4%	28 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	16%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.00	15%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	14%	26 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	31%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.05	30%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	24%	24 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	15%	24 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	11%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	14%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.00	8%	20 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	14%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	18%	20 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	18%	15 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.11	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.02	20%	15 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	12%	14 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	17%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.03	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	10%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	17%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	23%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	7%	12 Jul →
inferno	0–3	-0.01	0%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	22%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	14%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	6%	9 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	5%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	14%	8 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	13%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	7%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.04	17%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.00	25%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	16%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	9%	7 Jul →
inferno	7–7	-0.04	17%	7 Jul →
nuke	1–8	-0.09	0%	6 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	11%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	16%	6 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	16%	6 Jul →
ancient	12–12	-0.00	24%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	19%	6 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	15%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	17%	5 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	23%	5 Jul →