maertensen

maertensen — CS2 Stats

DE76561198030121605[U:1:69855877]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,916Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,956Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#99462 of 259112 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+95Premier CS Rating · 18,861 → 18,956

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,956 -6,168 25 Nov – 31 Oct · 20 days played
18,73326,389peak 26,38925 Nov31 Oct
26,629Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2025-11-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,433 below peak (26,389)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,044 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmaertensenFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,956 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning66
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWLWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.6
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time586ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 16–13 · dust2, 4 Dec →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · overpass, 25 Nov →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 24 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 10 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3318–1555%0.01
infernoS129–375%0.03
ancientC125–742%-0.00
cacheB105–550%0.02
mirageA106–460%0.00
anubisD72–529%0.03
overpassC73–443%0.02
nukeB63–350%-0.00
train—32–167%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,950Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
77.7ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212757%1.1617.2
Mirage12347%0.9313.5
Ancient10448%1.0515.5
Anubis9048%1.1415.9
Inferno8059%1.1315.7
Vertigo3653%0.9813.2
Overpass2143%1.1813.4
Nuke1741%1.0416.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
590msReaction time
69.7%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
14.1%Flash assists
8.45HE damage / grenade
9.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.8986% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0418%31 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0324%31 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0123%31 Oct →
inferno13–160.0732%30 Oct →
dust213–60.0028%30 Oct →
cache10–130.0123%30 Oct →
inferno10–40.1017%29 Oct →
nuke13–100.0026%29 Oct →
cache15–150.0121%29 Oct →
mirage10–130.0431%28 Oct →
anubis10–130.0528%28 Oct →
dust216–120.0231%28 Oct →
anubis11–130.0523%28 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0127%27 Oct →
ancient13–110.0429%27 Oct →
inferno13–70.0223%27 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0128%27 Oct →
inferno13–50.0419%27 Oct →
cache13–100.0525%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0133%26 Oct →
dust211–130.0524%26 Oct →
inferno15–150.0133%25 Oct →
cache15–15-0.019%25 Oct →
dust211–130.0328%24 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0017%24 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.019%24 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0323%24 Oct →
dust216–140.0030%24 Oct →
cache2–130.0128%21 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0418%21 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0233%21 Oct →
dust213–50.0828%21 Oct →
ancient8–130.0525%20 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0220%19 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0413%19 Oct →
dust29–130.0636%19 Oct →
dust213–110.0335%17 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0421%17 Oct →
dust213–40.1137%17 Oct →
anubis16–130.0525%17 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0129%17 Oct →
mirage13–90.0511%17 Oct →
dust26–130.0730%17 Oct →
cache16–130.0417%17 Oct →
anubis13–40.0524%17 Oct →
inferno13–80.0919%17 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0220%17 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0316%16 Oct →
cache11–130.0022%10 May →
cache13–00.1025%10 May →
ancient13–11-0.0115%9 Feb →
anubis15–150.0018%9 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0627%9 Feb →
dust213–90.0124%12 Jan →
nuke11–130.0321%12 Jan →
dust211–13-0.1039%11 Jan →
inferno13–100.1028%22 Dec →
mirage13–90.0328%22 Dec →
ancient13–16-0.0524%20 Dec →
dust213–10-0.0912%20 Dec →
dust213–80.0020%20 Dec →
mirage15–15-0.0226%20 Dec →
dust213–70.0224%20 Dec →
train13–9-0.068%20 Dec →
mirage13–20.0623%20 Dec →
nuke13–50.0531%20 Dec →
mirage13–50.0020%11 Dec →
dust213–90.0322%11 Dec →
ancient7–13-0.0721%9 Dec →
overpass13–50.0326%9 Dec →
nuke13–110.0324%9 Dec →
nuke1–13-0.1215%9 Dec →
train11–130.0421%9 Dec →
inferno11–130.0224%9 Dec →
ancient10–130.0014%7 Dec →
dust214–160.0219%7 Dec →
ancient11–130.0411%7 Dec →
dust216–130.1335%4 Dec →
dust213–100.079%4 Dec →
overpass13–160.0322%4 Dec →
train13–90.0128%1 Dec →
overpass14–16-0.0119%30 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0728%30 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0621%29 Nov →
dust214–160.0227%29 Nov →
overpass10–130.0725%29 Nov →
overpass11–13-0.0319%28 Nov →
overpass13–11-0.0122%28 Nov →
dust215–150.0128%28 Nov →
inferno13–90.0018%28 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0126%28 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0818%28 Nov →
inferno13–7-0.0217%28 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0014%28 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0521%26 Nov →
dust213–30.0728%26 Nov →
ancient16–130.0422%26 Nov →
mirage13–60.0119%25 Nov →
dust213–60.0222%25 Nov →
overpass13–110.0440%25 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.