whyzard

whyzard — CS2 Stats

KR76561198030106055[U:1:69840327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,036Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 18 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,887 +729 18 Jan23 Jun · 31 days played
14,15818,303peak 18,30318 Jan23 Jun
18,320Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2026-01-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning44
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWLWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −78ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.7

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time605ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 5 Feb
36%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 5 Apr
430msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 17 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 8% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB27141352%-0.02
mirageB157847%-0.01
anubisA159660%0.01
dust2D121118%-0.03
overpassS129375%0.01
cacheC94544%-0.01
ancientD51420%-0.03
nuke3030%-0.01
sanctum110100%-0.02
vertigo110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.2%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
595msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
7.64HE damage / grenade
6.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.7145% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10.0524%17 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0329%7 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0418%30 Aug
cache7–13-0.044%30 Aug
anubis13–70.0523%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.0516%13 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0415%13 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0411%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0321%12 Aug
anubis13–50.0013%7 Aug
cache12–16-0.0516%2 Aug
inferno11–130.0311%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0214%31 Jul
inferno10–13-0.079%24 Jul
mirage10–13-0.088%21 Jul
cache7–13-0.048%21 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0610%21 Jul
mirage13–60.0624%20 Jul
inferno6–130.0323%19 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0210%19 Jul
cache13–110.0310%19 Jul
cache13–50.0520%11 Jul
dust25–13-0.0333%11 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0313%23 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0112%23 Jun
overpass13–100.0231%18 Jun
inferno8–130.0429%16 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0314%25 May
sanctum9–3-0.0229%22 May
inferno9–6-0.0819%22 May
inferno9–13-0.087%13 May
inferno13–6-0.0234%12 May
cache13–100.0429%8 May
cache13–60.0331%8 May
cache0–3-0.070%29 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0722%27 Apr
dust24–13-0.0913%19 Apr
anubis7–130.0416%19 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0217%13 Apr
anubis12–16-0.0212%10 Apr
inferno13–50.0114%8 Apr
inferno13–70.0221%6 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0136%5 Apr
mirage8–130.0522%5 Apr
overpass13–70.0920%5 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0316%29 Mar
dust26–13-0.0413%12 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0018%5 Mar
overpass13–50.0216%25 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0113%20 Feb
inferno16–14-0.027%20 Feb
anubis13–110.0523%18 Feb
mirage7–13-0.069%8 Feb
dust29–13-0.0423%6 Feb
overpass2–13-0.0316%6 Feb
overpass11–130.0217%5 Feb
overpass13–4-0.0114%5 Feb
mirage13–2-0.0214%5 Feb
anubis13–20.1120%5 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0318%3 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0320%2 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0420%2 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0320%31 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0215%31 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0023%30 Jan
dust24–13-0.0124%30 Jan
anubis1–13-0.1017%29 Jan
inferno13–80.0111%29 Jan
dust211–13-0.0023%29 Jan
mirage13–90.0221%28 Jan
anubis13–70.029%28 Jan
dust26–13-0.0215%28 Jan
anubis16–130.0621%28 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0414%28 Jan
overpass13–70.0321%28 Jan
inferno13–30.0313%27 Jan
dust216–12-0.0016%27 Jan
nuke10–130.0013%27 Jan
overpass13–70.0116%26 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0210%26 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0715%25 Jan
inferno5–13-0.059%25 Jan
dust26–13-0.0924%25 Jan
anubis16–140.015%25 Jan
inferno13–80.0111%25 Jan
nuke7–130.0022%24 Jan
dust212–160.0014%24 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0419%24 Jan
ancient4–13-0.089%24 Jan
overpass13–30.0114%24 Jan
inferno13–110.008%24 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0021%23 Jan
ancient13–40.0310%23 Jan
dust29–130.0115%23 Jan
anubis13–50.0814%23 Jan
inferno13–40.0110%23 Jan
anubis12–16-0.0410%23 Jan
vertigo13–9-0.0512%20 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0414%19 Jan
ancient15–15-0.0415%18 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →