Kaspars_mat

Kaspars_mat — CS2 Stats

76561198027694671[U:1:67428943]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,478Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6615 of 55805 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,587 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKaspars_matFACEITLevel 10 · 2,587 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning54
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49465Last 10049%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.3
Aggression5.9
Utility4.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time550ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — inferno 9–2
130Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27151256%0.03
ancientC2071335%0.01
mirageC156940%0.03
nukeD124833%0.01
anubisS118373%0.03
cacheC94544%0.02
inferno330100%0.10
overpass110100%0.12
vertigo1010%0.14
poseidon110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,127Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
80.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust216152%1.2517.0
Mirage15145%1.0816.3
Ancient10448%1.2117.1
Anubis9149%1.1015.2
Inferno7156%1.1515.9
Nuke6653%1.2517.8
Train743%0.9715.0
Overpass667%1.0616.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
41.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.0%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
544msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
5.85HE damage / grenade
15.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4956 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8199% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0035%18 Aug
mirage13–40.0320%18 Aug
ancient13–1-0.0121%16 Aug
nuke8–130.0233%16 Aug
cache13–100.0618%16 Aug
dust213–7-0.055%16 Aug
dust213–60.0112%16 Aug
nuke13–100.0921%16 Aug
dust211–130.0622%15 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0019%15 Aug
dust213–60.0822%12 Aug
dust213–60.0115%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0611%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0320%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0316%3 Aug
cache6–13-0.0120%3 Aug
anubis13–90.0521%3 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0118%30 Jul
dust213–90.1124%22 Jul
dust213–30.1236%21 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0329%19 Jul
dust20–130.0150%19 Jul
nuke2–130.0129%19 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0015%19 Jul
ancient13–60.0932%19 Jul
dust22–13-0.0636%17 Jul
dust216–140.0329%17 Jul
ancient10–20.0321%17 Jul
nuke13–30.1326%8 Jul
mirage6–130.0626%30 Jun
cache8–130.0823%30 Jun
dust210–130.0319%30 Jun
mirage9–130.0318%29 Jun
mirage11–130.0326%27 Jun
nuke1–130.0038%27 Jun
inferno7–20.0216%27 Jun
mirage10–130.0117%27 Jun
ancient10–130.0318%27 Jun
anubis9–13-0.079%27 Jun
cache4–130.0318%25 Jun
dust23–130.0325%25 Jun
anubis13–60.0619%25 Jun
cache13–60.0124%25 Jun
dust213–60.0422%22 Jun
ancient7–130.0319%22 Jun
ancient6–130.0216%11 Jun
mirage13–100.0327%11 Jun
overpass9–40.1214%10 Jun
nuke4–90.0811%10 Jun
vertigo8–80.1424%10 Jun
poseidon9–60.0916%10 Jun
inferno9–20.2920%10 Jun
nuke4–9-0.0517%10 Jun
ancient11–130.0211%4 Jun
dust25–13-0.0011%4 Jun
anubis13–40.0412%28 May
ancient16–130.0412%28 May
nuke13–10-0.0224%19 May
ancient13–00.0318%19 May
nuke8–130.0126%14 May
mirage13–90.0817%14 May
dust213–50.0122%14 May
ancient15–150.0123%14 May
cache7–13-0.0625%12 May
anubis13–80.0515%12 May
dust213–100.0112%12 May
ancient11–13-0.0514%12 May
anubis13–90.0610%12 May
cache16–140.0616%12 May
dust213–8-0.0415%9 May
mirage14–160.0215%9 May
cache10–130.0635%6 May
cache11–3-0.0315%6 May
ancient4–130.0127%6 May
ancient2–13-0.0615%4 May
ancient7–130.0117%27 Apr
mirage13–40.1123%25 Apr
dust210–130.0323%25 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0428%25 Apr
dust210–13-0.0018%14 Apr
anubis13–20.0718%12 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0022%5 Apr
mirage13–100.0933%24 Mar
ancient12–120.0232%24 Mar
dust213–50.0944%22 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0122%19 Mar
dust29–130.0121%19 Mar
dust213–100.0314%18 Mar
dust213–50.1218%18 Mar
dust27–130.0322%18 Mar
ancient10–130.028%16 Mar
mirage16–140.0716%11 Mar
anubis10–130.0721%11 Mar
mirage0–4-0.0533%8 Mar
dust22–13-0.0421%6 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0512%4 Mar
anubis13–8-0.027%4 Mar
dust213–110.0811%4 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0520%2 Mar
ancient10–130.0522%2 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →