✪ Combz — CS2 Stats

US76561198025666114[U:1:65400386]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,550Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,811Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7177 of 28858 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,946 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning52

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3

Aggression6.4

Utility5.6

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.2

Utility5.6

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time568ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms

Headshot accuracy18.3%−0.7%

first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–4

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	B	25	12–13	48%	0.01
ancient	A	20	11–9	55%	0.00
inferno	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.02
cache	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.00
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	0.01
dust2	A	5	3–2	60%	0.02
mirage	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

728Matches

49%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

78.7ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	145	54%	1.13	16.6
Inferno	119	41%	1.05	16.0
Anubis	90	50%	1.08	17.0
Nuke	60	53%	1.22	16.5
Dust2	56	45%	0.95	15.1
Overpass	54	57%	1.02	15.3
Mirage	49	41%	0.96	15.2
Train	25	48%	1.14	15.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.3%Spray accuracy

73.8%Counter-strafing

10.9°Preaim

559msReaction time

33.3%T opening success

44.0%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

7.27HE damage / grenade

11.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4955 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.2519% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	0.04	13%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.06	24%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	11%	28 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	16%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	18%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	15%	26 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.00	19%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	17%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.07	17%	19 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.03	21%	18 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	15%	18 Aug →
train	6–13	-0.01	31%	16 Aug →
train	13–11	0.05	17%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.11	13%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.17	27%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.07	31%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	23%	15 Aug →
anubis	15–19	-0.00	16%	15 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	29%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.10	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	8%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	14%	12 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.02	24%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.14	24%	9 Aug →
nuke	4–9	-0.04	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.06	12%	9 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	30%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	9%	7 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.00	17%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	21%	7 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.03	12%	6 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.00	14%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.00	13%	5 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.02	8%	5 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	8%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	18%	5 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	19%	4 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	23%	4 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.01	32%	4 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.01	14%	4 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.01	17%	4 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	23%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.07	10%	4 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	15%	2 Aug →
cache	13–1	-0.01	19%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	8%	2 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	26%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	13%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.03	10%	2 Aug →
poseidon	4–9	-0.11	40%	2 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.02	16%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	24%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	16%	1 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	0.00	12%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.06	10%	1 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.03	12%	1 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.08	14%	31 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	19%	31 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.03	13%	31 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.01	13%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.02	9%	30 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.04	7%	29 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	14%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	16%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	17%	27 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	29%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	33%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.05	18%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	21%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.07	18%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	11%	24 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	22%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.00	25%	23 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	10%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.05	15%	23 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	15%	23 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	15%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	8%	22 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.02	32%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	15%	20 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	29%	20 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.04	22%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	23%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	9%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.00	24%	17 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	19%	16 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.03	24%	16 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	13%	15 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.09	16%	15 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	12%	15 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.09	13%	15 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.00	15%	14 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	25%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	23%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.07	24%	14 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.04	19%	14 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	16%	13 Jul →