Dajje

Dajje — CS2 Stats

SE76561198022367200[U:1:62101472]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,716Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating17,723Purple band · top ~17.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,541 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (35 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 17,723 → 17,723
0Faceit ELO · 1,541 → 1,541
+104Tracked matches · now 3,716
−16.7ppWin rate · 70.0% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,723 +0 5 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations
17,72317,723peak 17,7235 Sept10 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,541 +0 5 Sept – 10 Sept · 2 observations
1,5411,541peak 1,5415 Sept10 Sept
17,723Peak Premier on CSDB
1,541Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-04-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,541
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 210 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,723
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,277 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDajjeFACEITLevel 8 · 1,541 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,723 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,541csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning61
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–44Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +58ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility7.4
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.1
Utility7.4
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time575ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 7–13 · ancient, 18 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · inferno, 16 Apr →
422msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · anubis, 3 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
16–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 88% over 8cacheWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC198–1142%0.00
dust2A169–756%0.01
ancientS1410–471%0.03
cacheD103–730%0.01
mirageS107–370%0.01
nukeA85–363%-0.00
anubisS87–188%0.03
vertigoB84–450%0.04
cache_bC52–340%0.01
overpass—10–10%0.01
train—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,875Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno28254%1.0315.4
Ancient27249%1.0115.6
Dust226147%1.0016.0
Nuke19751%1.0616.2
Anubis15950%1.0115.4
Mirage15842%1.0015.8
Cache6245%1.0616.1
Vertigo5054%1.1214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
583msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
12.35HE damage / grenade
20.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9756% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–16-0.0118%13 Oct →
nuke13–110.0319%12 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0332%7 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0423%7 Oct →
ancient13–80.0919%6 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0830%5 Oct →
anubis8–130.0115%24 Sept →
cache16–140.0415%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0116%17 Sept →
ancient16–19-0.0018%15 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0121%14 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0218%11 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0320%6 Sept →
cache13–80.0417%5 Sept →
ancient13–110.017%5 Sept →
nuke8–130.0127%4 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0124%3 Sept →
anubis16–130.1113%3 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0515%2 Sept →
mirage10–130.0115%31 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0519%29 Aug →
ancient13–110.0219%29 Aug →
anubis13–110.1030%28 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.039%27 Aug →
vertigo7–130.0131%26 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0215%26 Aug →
nuke13–90.0511%25 Aug →
vertigo13–11-0.0011%22 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0117%22 Aug →
vertigo19–150.0510%19 Aug →
ancient13–40.0725%19 Aug →
ancient7–130.1313%18 Aug →
anubis13–20.0712%18 Aug →
dust213–70.0018%17 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0415%17 Aug →
ancient13–30.0922%1 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.028%1 Aug →
inferno13–90.0114%1 Aug →
dust222–20-0.009%18 Jul →
dust213–80.0611%14 Jul →
overpass9–130.0111%9 Jul →
vertigo13–80.058%9 Jul →
inferno13–100.1317%9 Jul →
ancient13–30.0118%9 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.005%9 Jul →
mirage9–10.1016%9 Jul →
dust213–100.0226%3 Jul →
cache13–110.0027%2 Jul →
ancient4–130.0222%23 Jun →
nuke13–110.0524%22 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0315%22 Jun →
mirage19–150.0015%18 Jun →
ancient13–110.0513%17 Jun →
cache8–130.0120%17 Jun →
vertigo13–30.032%17 Jun →
vertigo10–130.039%17 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0114%17 Jun →
inferno9–60.0318%17 Jun →
inferno8–130.0511%29 May →
cache9–13-0.0512%28 May →
dust28–13-0.0131%25 May →
inferno11–130.0016%22 May →
cache7–130.0719%22 May →
mirage13–9-0.0226%21 May →
nuke2–13-0.0414%21 May →
mirage11–13-0.0215%20 May →
dust216–140.0318%18 May →
dust27–13-0.0116%12 May →
mirage10–130.0221%6 May →
mirage13–8-0.0415%5 May →
dust213–60.0420%5 May →
cache5–13-0.0018%4 May →
anubis19–150.019%30 Apr →
cache7–130.0717%30 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.094%29 Apr →
mirage13–60.0614%28 Apr →
nuke13–40.0227%27 Apr →
dust213–50.0418%24 Apr →
dust28–130.0313%23 Apr →
ancient13–110.0923%23 Apr →
inferno16–140.0623%22 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0823%22 Apr →
cache_b12–160.0313%21 Apr →
inferno13–160.0119%21 Apr →
vertigo7–130.0625%21 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0528%17 Apr →
cache_b13–70.0326%17 Apr →
mirage16–14-0.0312%17 Apr →
cache_b13–40.0316%17 Apr →
inferno13–5-0.0418%17 Apr →
dust29–130.0511%17 Apr →
inferno19–220.0113%17 Apr →
inferno9–130.0115%17 Apr →
inferno11–130.0438%16 Apr →
vertigo11–130.0924%16 Apr →
train13–3-0.0520%16 Apr →
cache_b5–13-0.0510%16 Apr →
dust213–100.0210%16 Apr →
cache_b15–190.0117%16 Apr →
mirage19–15-0.0013%16 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.