Harloh

Harloh — CS2 Stats

US76561198022082256[U:1:61816528]Steam profile ↗

1,336Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHarlohFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning50
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39556Last 10039%Win rateWWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim4.2
Aggression7.1
Utility4.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch8.4

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 679ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning5.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time679ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 705ms → last ⅓ avg 679ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–9
130Biggest win — train
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC34132138%0.00
nukeD1441029%0.00
mirageC114736%-0.01
infernoC83538%0.00
ancientA74357%-0.01
trainD62433%-0.00
anubisD61517%-0.01
overpassA53260%-0.03
shelter21150%0.03
vertigo220100%0.01
boulder1010%-0.04
fachwerk110100%-0.02
dust21010%-0.04
warden110100%-0.01
office1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

117Matches
46%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
74.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

62%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage933%1.0614.8
Inferno667%1.0716.2
Ancient475%1.0212.8
Nuke30%0.8813.7
Overpass367%1.5217.3
Vertigo333%1.0424.0
Cache20%0.539.0
Dust2250%0.8415.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
679msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
9.96HE damage / grenade
6.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4101 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3252% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass13–2-0.040%18 Aug
train13–100.0113%18 Aug
cache3–13-0.0713%18 Aug
mirage13–110.0522%13 Aug
cache4–130.0238%13 Aug
overpass9–13-0.0118%12 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0123%12 Aug
cache5–13-0.075%12 Aug
nuke9–130.0719%12 Aug
train13–00.028%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0714%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0015%3 Aug
cache13–30.0419%3 Aug
cache13–7-0.0611%28 Jul
anubis8–130.0912%28 Jul
cache13–70.0424%21 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0413%21 Jul
shelter13–70.0430%21 Jul
ancient11–130.0021%15 Jul
mirage4–13-0.069%15 Jul
inferno4–130.0216%15 Jul
fachwerk13–10-0.0210%12 Jul
shelter6–130.0116%12 Jul
mirage5–130.0726%3 Jul
cache12–120.0512%3 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0111%3 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0222%27 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0311%27 Jun
mirage13–30.0115%27 Jun
nuke13–100.0325%27 Jun
inferno13–70.1427%27 Jun
dust29–13-0.0420%27 Jun
ancient13–110.0018%26 Jun
anubis13–60.0626%26 Jun
inferno13–80.0012%26 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0525%26 Jun
ancient13–7-0.022%24 Jun
nuke7–130.0138%24 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0511%24 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0421%24 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0316%24 Jun
inferno16–12-0.0410%24 Jun
cache13–70.1314%22 Jun
warden13–5-0.0117%22 Jun
cache10–130.0120%22 Jun
cache12–12-0.0614%19 Jun
inferno7–130.0215%19 Jun
nuke12–120.0313%19 Jun
train10–130.0425%19 Jun
mirage12–12-0.029%18 Jun
nuke13–80.0126%18 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0120%18 Jun
cache8–130.0316%18 Jun
cache10–13-0.0321%13 Jun
cache9–13-0.0323%13 Jun
cache9–130.0315%13 Jun
nuke7–13-0.009%13 Jun
cache13–100.0517%9 Jun
cache13–90.1122%9 Jun
mirage2–3-0.0414%9 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0812%9 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0220%31 May
train4–13-0.0638%31 May
ancient13–70.0222%31 May
mirage11–13-0.0130%31 May
cache6–13-0.0429%30 May
mirage8–13-0.0225%30 May
cache13–90.1510%30 May
train6–130.0235%30 May
train12–12-0.0619%28 May
nuke8–13-0.0312%28 May
cache13–11-0.0413%27 May
cache13–3-0.025%27 May
nuke5–13-0.0114%27 May
cache7–13-0.0320%27 May
overpass7–13-0.0521%25 May
cache8–13-0.0924%25 May
cache7–00.067%25 May
nuke6–130.0210%25 May
vertigo13–8-0.027%18 May
nuke9–130.069%18 May
overpass13–8-0.0314%18 May
cache13–110.0619%18 May
mirage10–13-0.0219%18 May
anubis3–13-0.0812%18 May
cache3–50.0613%18 May
cache4–13-0.0325%16 May
cache3–13-0.107%16 May
cache13–100.0524%16 May
cache2–13-0.0829%14 May
cache13–2-0.0035%14 May
cache4–13-0.0014%14 May
cache7–130.0220%14 May
cache7–130.0026%14 May
cache10–13-0.0426%12 May
inferno7–13-0.0012%11 May
nuke5–13-0.0717%11 May
vertigo13–70.0516%11 May
anubis11–13-0.0616%11 May
office4–13-0.0615%11 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →