TiHappy

TiHappy — CS2 Stats

BE76561198021075507[U:1:60809779]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,750Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#70949 of 259000 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,438 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,896 +1,394 30 Jun – 4 Jan · 9 days played
19,50220,896peak 20,89630 Jun4 Jan
20,896Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,438Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2025-05-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,438
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTiHappyFACEITLevel 10 · 2,438 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,438csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning49
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.6
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.9
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time545ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 3 Nov →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · dust2, 1 Dec →
383msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 19 Dec →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 30 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3314–1942%-0.00
dust2A2112–957%-0.00
anubisD134–931%-0.01
ancientC114–736%0.01
mirageA85–363%-0.01
trainA53–260%0.00
overpassS54–180%0.02
cache—22–0100%-0.01
nuke—22–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,454Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
71.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno23358%1.0615.0
Dust219145%0.9314.0
Anubis17150%0.9214.1
Ancient15152%0.9814.3
Mirage12644%0.9514.6
Nuke4562%0.8713.2
Overpass3855%0.9215.4
Train3557%1.0215.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
546msReaction time
19.8%T opening success
35.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
10.04HE damage / grenade
8.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7865% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.8209% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–130.0026%27 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0413%4 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0212%27 Aug →
dust213–30.0114%5 Aug →
dust213–50.0514%30 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0622%27 Jul →
cache13–110.0320%27 Jul →
dust214–160.0212%26 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0420%13 Jul →
anubis7–130.0914%9 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0318%5 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0511%4 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0319%4 Jun →
inferno13–50.0210%4 Jun →
anubis3–130.0015%31 May →
mirage6–13-0.0313%31 May →
inferno13–4-0.0216%2 May →
ancient11–13-0.017%2 May →
inferno9–13-0.047%30 Apr →
inferno11–130.0613%30 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0322%19 Apr →
dust27–13-0.078%15 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.026%6 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.0518%5 Apr →
nuke13–110.014%30 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0221%16 Feb →
dust213–8-0.0331%15 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0519%13 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0010%1 Feb →
ancient7–130.0612%30 Jan →
inferno13–60.0219%24 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0218%12 Jan →
inferno13–70.0411%12 Jan →
ancient4–13-0.0415%5 Jan →
dust213–110.0225%5 Jan →
inferno13–70.0319%4 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0322%3 Jan →
inferno6–130.0319%3 Jan →
mirage13–80.017%3 Jan →
nuke13–8-0.0513%30 Dec →
dust213–90.0228%21 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.048%19 Dec →
dust213–60.0416%11 Dec →
dust29–130.0322%5 Dec →
mirage13–50.0326%4 Dec →
dust213–70.0226%3 Dec →
inferno4–130.024%3 Dec →
dust213–16-0.0131%1 Dec →
dust27–13-0.0210%29 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0315%29 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.0521%29 Nov →
inferno13–70.0220%29 Nov →
inferno9–130.0225%19 Nov →
train10–13-0.0118%17 Nov →
overpass13–70.0322%17 Nov →
overpass13–90.0323%14 Nov →
dust22–13-0.0415%14 Nov →
inferno13–5-0.0110%13 Nov →
train2–13-0.049%13 Nov →
overpass13–110.0310%12 Nov →
mirage3–130.017%12 Nov →
overpass13–7-0.0214%12 Nov →
dust213–90.0128%11 Nov →
ancient13–100.0510%11 Nov →
inferno13–90.0217%10 Nov →
ancient13–40.1316%3 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0410%5 Oct →
train13–100.0619%5 Oct →
mirage14–160.0021%3 Oct →
inferno9–130.0113%3 Oct →
inferno10–130.0820%30 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0313%22 Sept →
overpass10–130.0314%12 Sept →
inferno16–130.0318%1 Sept →
ancient11–130.0012%20 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0214%19 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0019%6 Aug →
ancient13–60.0228%6 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.065%6 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0317%5 Jul →
inferno13–50.0315%5 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0214%5 Jul →
dust211–130.0116%5 Jul →
anubis13–40.0419%30 Jun →
anubis13–20.0118%30 Jun →
train13–3-0.028%30 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0415%30 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0622%25 Jun →
inferno9–130.0315%25 Jun →
train13–110.0315%25 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0320%24 Jun →
anubis1–13-0.0112%24 Jun →
dust213–70.0016%24 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0516%24 Jun →
ancient9–130.0413%23 Jun →
inferno13–100.0428%23 Jun →
inferno11–130.0020%23 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0418%15 May →
anubis13–90.0315%15 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.