Pat — CS2 Stats

76561198020997489[U:1:60731761]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,685Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,552Blue band · top ~30.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14134 of 21630 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50

Positioning54

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–44–7Last 10049%Win rateLWTWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0

Aggression7.5

Utility5.8

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0

Positioning5.4

Utility5.8

Mechanics2.6

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time522ms−52ms

first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms

Headshot accuracy14.8%+1.4%

first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–6

13–1Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	27	13–14	48%	0.01
inferno	B	22	11–11	50%	0.01
ancient	A	15	9–6	60%	0.01
cache	S	14	10–4	71%	0.03
dust2	D	11	2–9	18%	0.00
anubis	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

96Matches

55%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

85.7ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	29	45%	0.95	15.2
Anubis	18	56%	1.07	17.0
Inferno	16	62%	1.07	17.1
Cache	14	50%	1.11	16.9
Nuke	11	82%	1.43	18.2
Overpass	4	75%	1.33	15.5
Mirage	3	33%	0.72	8.7
Ancient	1	0%	1.25	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.7%Spray accuracy

61.7%Counter-strafing

11.6°Preaim

519msReaction time

33.4%T opening success

48.1%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

1.7%Flash assists

8.01HE damage / grenade

16.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.9097% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4319 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.4477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	8–13	-0.02	10%	28 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	15%	28 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.03	18%	28 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	11%	28 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.00	14%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	13%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.00	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.05	19%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.03	19%	25 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.00	7%	24 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	13%	24 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	12%	23 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.01	11%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	15%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	22%	22 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	24%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	15%	22 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.04	24%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	12%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	22%	21 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	10%	21 Aug →
cache	12–1	-0.00	22%	21 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.02	5%	20 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	10%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	12%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	11%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	20%	20 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	16%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.13	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.04	14%	19 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.16	18%	19 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.02	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	15%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.02	27%	18 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.03	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	11%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.05	14%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	6%	17 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	13%	17 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.00	12%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	9%	17 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.00	10%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	6%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	9%	16 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.09	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	12%	16 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	14%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	13%	15 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	14%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.01	15%	15 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	13%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	19%	14 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.05	14%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.03	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	13%	14 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.01	7%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	18%	14 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	16%	13 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	13%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.11	23%	13 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.05	13%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	12%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.02	14%	12 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.03	14%	12 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	7%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	20%	11 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	22%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.04	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	16%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	15%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	9%	7 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.06	6%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	12%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.01	3%	7 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	22%	7 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.05	15%	7 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	2%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.07	13%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	24%	7 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	15%	7 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	18%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.05	21%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.08	10%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	17%	6 Aug →
nuke	12–16	0.02	15%	6 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.05	9%	6 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	9%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	9%	5 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	14%	5 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.05	22%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.03	13%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	15%	5 Aug →
nuke	7–3	0.02	11%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.01	9%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	11%	5 Aug →