dr gaff

dr gaff — CS2 Stats

76561198018288815[U:1:58023087]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,197Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+5Tracked matches · now 2,197
+3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 50.0%

Rating over time

1,999Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-31

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches4031+9
Win rate45%42%+3pp
K/D1.171.21−0.04
Headshot %43%42%+0pp

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 24 Oct 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 26 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdr gaffFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,999csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning61
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–55Last 10045%Win rateWWWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility7.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch5.6

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.84 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.1
Utility7.9
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time545ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 15 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–3 · inferno, 14 Sept →
281msFastest reaction time · 2–3 · inferno, 14 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 15 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 0% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2012–860%0.04
ancientA1912–763%0.04
anubisC156–940%0.04
infernoC125–742%0.01
cacheD112–918%0.00
mirageD90–90%-0.01
dust2D72–529%0.01
vertigoS76–186%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

472Matches
54%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
87.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6067%1.4820.0
Anubis5650%1.3018.1
Nuke5161%1.5018.2
Inferno4852%1.4018.1
Vertigo3571%1.3517.9
Mirage2129%0.9315.6
Cache2050%1.2516.9
Dust21735%1.1918.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
548msReaction time
60.0%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.84Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
9.83HE damage / grenade
12.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.1274% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0313%25 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0016%25 Oct →
nuke13–50.0913%24 Oct →
ancient13–110.065%24 Oct →
dust213–80.0616%24 Oct →
inferno10–130.0113%23 Oct →
mirage9–130.0421%23 Oct →
anubis13–40.1128%23 Oct →
inferno4–130.0115%22 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0322%22 Oct →
ancient13–70.0020%20 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0111%19 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0117%18 Oct →
nuke13–90.0116%18 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.027%17 Oct →
nuke10–130.0413%17 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0310%16 Oct →
dust211–130.0824%16 Oct →
nuke13–30.0519%16 Oct →
ancient9–130.0216%16 Oct →
ancient13–70.0315%14 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0910%14 Oct →
ancient11–130.0213%12 Oct →
anubis13–90.0316%12 Oct →
inferno16–190.0414%11 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0116%11 Oct →
ancient13–80.0516%11 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0424%3 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.058%3 Oct →
cache16–130.0616%3 Oct →
nuke13–50.0915%3 Oct →
ancient19–170.0419%28 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0319%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0211%26 Sept →
ancient13–50.0519%26 Sept →
nuke13–100.0618%26 Sept →
nuke16–130.0820%25 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0022%25 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0611%23 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0011%23 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0117%23 Sept →
mirage11–130.018%21 Sept →
nuke9–130.0817%21 Sept →
anubis13–160.0215%21 Sept →
cache14–160.0416%14 Sept →
inferno2–3-0.02100%14 Sept →
ancient13–70.0910%13 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0813%13 Sept →
inferno8–130.0219%13 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0731%11 Sept →
anubis13–110.0216%11 Sept →
anubis19–160.1216%8 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0218%8 Sept →
mirage13–160.0114%8 Sept →
ancient13–100.0214%8 Sept →
ancient14–160.0518%7 Sept →
nuke13–80.0321%7 Sept →
ancient13–40.0817%3 Sept →
inferno7–130.0318%3 Sept →
nuke13–70.1121%28 Aug →
inferno13–40.0418%28 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0119%28 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0115%25 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0017%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.0210%21 Aug →
ancient12–160.0113%21 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0021%21 Aug →
nuke8–130.0222%21 Aug →
vertigo13–50.107%19 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0011%19 Aug →
ancient13–60.1012%19 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0310%15 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0113%15 Aug →
anubis13–20.1922%15 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0710%15 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0118%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0211%15 Aug →
nuke13–50.0719%14 Aug →
inferno13–100.0418%14 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0015%14 Aug →
anubis13–40.0312%14 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0320%14 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0317%13 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0320%13 Aug →
nuke10–130.0312%13 Aug →
cache13–110.0614%12 Aug →
vertigo3–130.0333%12 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.035%12 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0314%11 Aug →
anubis9–130.0515%11 Aug →
ancient9–130.0316%10 Aug →
vertigo13–110.0114%10 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0011%5 Aug →
ancient13–80.0916%5 Aug →
nuke13–60.0414%5 Aug →
ancient19–150.1114%4 Aug →
cache5–130.0519%4 Aug →
dust213–110.0120%1 Aug →
anubis10–130.0616%1 Aug →
nuke8–130.0019%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.